Mono vs. Stereo

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
User avatar
musicandme
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:16 pm

Mono vs. Stereo

Post by musicandme » Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:42 am

I've been doing a good amount of research on mixing techniques recently and one thing that I have realized is that I've never given much consideration towards making sounds mono rather than stereo. The most recent book I've been reading (Rick Snoman's "Dance Music Manual") has mentioned that mono sounds are allowed to take a very specific spot in the mix in contrast with hard to locate stereo sounds. This is difficult for me to comprehend, because I enjoy making huge stereo sounds with reverbs and width, and it feels like so many of my favorite records contain similar sounds.

How do you handle different sounds in regards to stereo vs. mono? Are big bass sounds/wobbles always done in mono? How about kick drums? Vocals? Leads? Pads? Any thoughts on the subject matter would be :4:
Uploaded 3/3:
Soundcloud
Any sort of constructive feedback will be greatly appreciated! And I'm a soundcloud addict so I'll return the favor.
Image
Hircine wrote:holy fuck you guys overthink stuff a lot

User avatar
Hircine
Posts: 2813
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:42 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil.

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by Hircine » Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:48 am

musicandme wrote:I've been doing a good amount of research on mixing techniques recently and one thing that I have realized is that I've never given much consideration towards making sounds mono rather than stereo. The most recent book I've been reading (Rick Snoman's "Dance Music Manual") has mentioned that mono sounds are allowed to take a very specific spot in the mix in contrast with hard to locate stereo sounds. This is difficult for me to comprehend, because I enjoy making huge stereo sounds with reverbs and width, and it feels like so many of my favorite records contain similar sounds.

How do you handle different sounds in regards to stereo vs. mono? Are big bass sounds/wobbles always done in mono? How about kick drums? Vocals? Leads? Pads? Any thoughts on the subject matter would be :4:
Anything below 100hz should stay mono. Kick drums and snare drums usually sit in the middle of the mix (imagine listening to a drummer playing in front of you and you will get a idea of where the drums should sit) And many club systems are mono. TBH I don't use pan at all while doing electronic music, just stereo spreads / chorus. Also stereo sound files take more cpu, heard it somewhere. Your reverbs and width should be okay in mono systems.
DSF's foreign exchange student
Forthcoming Bassweight Recordings:
Soundcloud
Facebook
phaeleh wrote:
bassbum wrote:The pheleleh tune I have never heard before and I did like it but its very simple and I could quickly recreate it.
Yeah I wanna hear it too :P

User avatar
Basic A
Posts: 6037
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:53 am
Location: Pittsburgh - You might know me as Teknicyde
Contact:

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by Basic A » Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:10 am

Hircine wrote:
musicandme wrote:I've been doing a good amount of research on mixing techniques recently and one thing that I have realized is that I've never given much consideration towards making sounds mono rather than stereo. The most recent book I've been reading (Rick Snoman's "Dance Music Manual") has mentioned that mono sounds are allowed to take a very specific spot in the mix in contrast with hard to locate stereo sounds. This is difficult for me to comprehend, because I enjoy making huge stereo sounds with reverbs and width, and it feels like so many of my favorite records contain similar sounds.

How do you handle different sounds in regards to stereo vs. mono? Are big bass sounds/wobbles always done in mono? How about kick drums? Vocals? Leads? Pads? Any thoughts on the subject matter would be :4:
Anything below 100hz should stay mono. Kick drums and snare drums usually sit in the middle of the mix (imagine listening to a drummer playing in front of you and you will get a idea of where the drums should sit) And many club systems are mono. TBH I don't use pan at all while doing electronic music, just stereo spreads / chorus. Also stereo sound files take more cpu, heard it somewhere. Your reverbs and width should be okay in mono systems.
Consider building your stereo width using true panning, its much more correlation-friendly, and will actually afford you alot more room in the mix prior to zero.

Nah, these days, most club systems are stereo, but the fact is, the best systems in the most reputable clubs are installations from the hayday of hifi, and mono was jsut plain simpler and more cost efficient then. Hell some of the most spectacular sounding club systems youll find are pre-1990 installs. Basically, the highest of the highend and the lowest in the bargian bin are both mono. Mix with mono in mind. Your tunes will end up on a mono system someday.

Dont fear bass panning, keep things correlating, on home hifi, bass panning can be used to spectacular effect, and if you pan a mono-correlating bass sound using true panning, your not going to damage the phase. Dont STEREO ENHANCE anything under 100hz. Panning isnt going to hurt, it wont benefit you live (bass cant be located that easily in space psycho-acoustically), but your home listeners will love you for it when their 5.1 goes off. KEEP PHASE IN MIND.

No stereo doesnt take more CPU thats silly, it will consume twice as much in audio applications that dont process realtime using a buffer, and will effect buffer size in those that do. But like, on bare playing back the media on your favorite player or timecode software, no, playback software are doubling the track and playing two copies to serve as l+r anyway, or else your stereo output cable would only have a signal coming through half of it, and youd need to mono your mixer/amp/headunit...
Last edited by Basic A on Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

Image
:::::: Basic A. ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/teknicyde]Teknicyde[/url] ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/drjinx]Dr. J!nx[/url] :::::
Phantom Hertz - Fentplates - Reboot Records - Cosmology - Applied Mathematics

User avatar
Hircine
Posts: 2813
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:42 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil.

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by Hircine » Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:12 am

Basic A wrote:
Hircine wrote:
musicandme wrote:I've been doing a good amount of research on mixing techniques recently and one thing that I have realized is that I've never given much consideration towards making sounds mono rather than stereo. The most recent book I've been reading (Rick Snoman's "Dance Music Manual") has mentioned that mono sounds are allowed to take a very specific spot in the mix in contrast with hard to locate stereo sounds. This is difficult for me to comprehend, because I enjoy making huge stereo sounds with reverbs and width, and it feels like so many of my favorite records contain similar sounds.

How do you handle different sounds in regards to stereo vs. mono? Are big bass sounds/wobbles always done in mono? How about kick drums? Vocals? Leads? Pads? Any thoughts on the subject matter would be :4:
Anything below 100hz should stay mono. Kick drums and snare drums usually sit in the middle of the mix (imagine listening to a drummer playing in front of you and you will get a idea of where the drums should sit) And many club systems are mono. TBH I don't use pan at all while doing electronic music, just stereo spreads / chorus. Also stereo sound files take more cpu, heard it somewhere. Your reverbs and width should be okay in mono systems.
Consider building your stereo width using true panning, its much more correlation-friendly, and will actually afford you alot more room in the mix prior to zero.
Could you please explain? Don't know if it's my english but I may not know what is true panning. :corntard:
DSF's foreign exchange student
Forthcoming Bassweight Recordings:
Soundcloud
Facebook
phaeleh wrote:
bassbum wrote:The pheleleh tune I have never heard before and I did like it but its very simple and I could quickly recreate it.
Yeah I wanna hear it too :P

User avatar
musicandme
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:16 pm

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by musicandme » Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:21 am

I am also confused about this "true panning" term..is this different than using the pan pot on a channel?

One big thing I'm worried about is how my tracks will convert from stereo in my headphones to the mono signal used in most PA's. I enjoy auto-panning and offsetting different sounds to give a feel for space and at times cause disorientation..this will obviously be completely lost when converted to mono. Am I wasting my time by taking time to add sounds from different directions/places?
Uploaded 3/3:
Soundcloud
Any sort of constructive feedback will be greatly appreciated! And I'm a soundcloud addict so I'll return the favor.
Image
Hircine wrote:holy fuck you guys overthink stuff a lot

User avatar
Basic A
Posts: 6037
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:53 am
Location: Pittsburgh - You might know me as Teknicyde
Contact:

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by Basic A » Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:23 am

Hircine wrote:
Basic A wrote:
Hircine wrote:
musicandme wrote:I've been doing a good amount of research on mixing techniques recently and one thing that I have realized is that I've never given much consideration towards making sounds mono rather than stereo. The most recent book I've been reading (Rick Snoman's "Dance Music Manual") has mentioned that mono sounds are allowed to take a very specific spot in the mix in contrast with hard to locate stereo sounds. This is difficult for me to comprehend, because I enjoy making huge stereo sounds with reverbs and width, and it feels like so many of my favorite records contain similar sounds.

How do you handle different sounds in regards to stereo vs. mono? Are big bass sounds/wobbles always done in mono? How about kick drums? Vocals? Leads? Pads? Any thoughts on the subject matter would be :4:
Anything below 100hz should stay mono. Kick drums and snare drums usually sit in the middle of the mix (imagine listening to a drummer playing in front of you and you will get a idea of where the drums should sit) And many club systems are mono. TBH I don't use pan at all while doing electronic music, just stereo spreads / chorus. Also stereo sound files take more cpu, heard it somewhere. Your reverbs and width should be okay in mono systems.
Consider building your stereo width using true panning, its much more correlation-friendly, and will actually afford you alot more room in the mix prior to zero.
Could you please explain? Don't know if it's my english but I may not know what is true panning. :corntard:
Stereo enhancers introduce slight delay on each side, panning turns one half of the volume down and the other half up.

Using the pan knob, and using stereo enhancement, are two totally different things. Using pan is like using a volume fader. Using stereo enhancements are like using a delay pedal.

No, the pan pot is what Im talking about, stereo enhancing effects can wreck phase correlation, and having a panned signal is usually just as psychoacoustically pleasing as having a stereo enhanced one, if not more pleasing.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

Image
:::::: Basic A. ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/teknicyde]Teknicyde[/url] ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/drjinx]Dr. J!nx[/url] :::::
Phantom Hertz - Fentplates - Reboot Records - Cosmology - Applied Mathematics

User avatar
Hircine
Posts: 2813
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:42 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil.

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by Hircine » Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:25 am

Basic A wrote:
Hircine wrote:
Basic A wrote:
Hircine wrote:
musicandme wrote:I've been doing a good amount of research on mixing techniques recently and one thing that I have realized is that I've never given much consideration towards making sounds mono rather than stereo. The most recent book I've been reading (Rick Snoman's "Dance Music Manual") has mentioned that mono sounds are allowed to take a very specific spot in the mix in contrast with hard to locate stereo sounds. This is difficult for me to comprehend, because I enjoy making huge stereo sounds with reverbs and width, and it feels like so many of my favorite records contain similar sounds.

How do you handle different sounds in regards to stereo vs. mono? Are big bass sounds/wobbles always done in mono? How about kick drums? Vocals? Leads? Pads? Any thoughts on the subject matter would be :4:
Anything below 100hz should stay mono. Kick drums and snare drums usually sit in the middle of the mix (imagine listening to a drummer playing in front of you and you will get a idea of where the drums should sit) And many club systems are mono. TBH I don't use pan at all while doing electronic music, just stereo spreads / chorus. Also stereo sound files take more cpu, heard it somewhere. Your reverbs and width should be okay in mono systems.
Consider building your stereo width using true panning, its much more correlation-friendly, and will actually afford you alot more room in the mix prior to zero.
Could you please explain? Don't know if it's my english but I may not know what is true panning. :corntard:
Stereo enhancers introduce slight delay on each side, panning turns one half of the volume down and the other half up.

Using the pan knob, and using stereo enhancement, are two totally different things. Using pan is like using a volume fader. Using stereo enhancements are like using a delay pedal.

No, the pan pot is what Im talking about, stereo enhancing effects can wreck phase correlation, and having a panned signal is usually just as psychoacoustically pleasing as having a stereo enhanced one, if not more pleasing.
Oh, that. Didn't know the word for it, thanks Basic A.
DSF's foreign exchange student
Forthcoming Bassweight Recordings:
Soundcloud
Facebook
phaeleh wrote:
bassbum wrote:The pheleleh tune I have never heard before and I did like it but its very simple and I could quickly recreate it.
Yeah I wanna hear it too :P

User avatar
musicandme
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:16 pm

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by musicandme » Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:52 am

Cool, thanks Basic A. I'll keep using the pan pot and not stereo enhancements.



Another very basic concept I'm struggling with is the difference in mono and stereo in concern to sounds generated from a software synth. From what I can tell a stereo sound sends a separate signal to the left and right channels/speakers, if it's a live instrument this is done w/ two individual microphones. Mono signals use a single microphone and send this recording through both channels/speakers evenly. Please correct me if I am wrong..

In regards to software synths, say I have one instance playing a lead or pad. I leave it dead center...this should be a mono signal correct? Will adding reverb, chorus, or delay change this? A phaser will clearly make it stereo correct?

Now if I take the same lead or pad, duplicate it, and pan them asymmetrically this makes it stereo? What if I just leave one instance and pan L or R, it remains mono that has been placed in the stereo field? What will the outcome be when converted to mono?

Again, any help or thoughts would be loved..

TL/DR: Is a soft synth automatically mono unless panned or run through a stereo effect?
Uploaded 3/3:
Soundcloud
Any sort of constructive feedback will be greatly appreciated! And I'm a soundcloud addict so I'll return the favor.
Image
Hircine wrote:holy fuck you guys overthink stuff a lot

User avatar
Today
Posts: 2653
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 9:14 pm
Location: New York

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by Today » Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:00 am

no, afaik most plugins say whether the instance is mono or stereo as you're instantiating it
and most default to stereo... i know Massive and Kontakt can open in mono but not the other NI products

also i find if i keep certain things mono, panning them sounds better than if it were stereo. panning Stereo channels just lowers the volume on either one side or the other so you're just losing some of the L or R
panning a mono channel actually moves the entire signal across the stereo field
dubstep Soundcloud

rock
Soundcloud

User avatar
musicandme
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:16 pm

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by musicandme » Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:11 am

Got it, thanks Today. Still confused about one last thing, say I open Massive in mono mode, then add a reverb or other stereo effect. Will this change it to a stereo signal?

Also, are mid-range bass tones and wobbles primarily done in stereo or mono?
Uploaded 3/3:
Soundcloud
Any sort of constructive feedback will be greatly appreciated! And I'm a soundcloud addict so I'll return the favor.
Image
Hircine wrote:holy fuck you guys overthink stuff a lot

tavravlavish
Posts: 1312
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:47 am
Location: seatroll

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by tavravlavish » Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:30 am

musicandme wrote:Got it, thanks Today. Still confused about one last thing, say I open Massive in mono mode, then add a reverb or other stereo effect. Will this change it to a stereo signal?

Also, are mid-range bass tones and wobbles primarily done in stereo or mono?
I think if it is a mono channel it stays mono but has a stereo effect that just moves around in mono... if that makes sense? :corntard: :6:

mid range bass is done in both, probably nowadays with more stereo effects n stuff more simple mid range wobble is probably usually mono? Just an assumption I don't know what I'm talking about really, I have never gotten my facts straight with audio stuff or anything for that matter.

User avatar
Today
Posts: 2653
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 9:14 pm
Location: New York

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by Today » Thu Jan 26, 2012 11:05 pm

The Mono instance of massive will stay mono. its built in effects will just process the signal on one channel (mono). i have no idea, though, how something like the dimension expander would sound. And i also don't know whether or not it will make a difference using Chorus vs. Mono Chorus. But, the instrument channel will remain mono unless you insert a mono-to-stereo plugin after it.
I believe most mid-range spectrum sounds are recorded in stereo. the ones i prefer in mono are generally percussion, because of the whole pan-pot thing. I like to be able to locate little clicks., hi-hats, rimshots etc across the stereo field with very sharply defined locations. to me, this can't be done in stereo as it just sounds like i'm turning down the right or left channel.
BUT everyone's ears are different. .. so, go figure.. just try it all
dubstep Soundcloud

rock
Soundcloud

daeMTHAFKNkim
Posts: 855
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 12:42 am
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by daeMTHAFKNkim » Thu Jan 26, 2012 11:53 pm

How would you go about mixing in Mono? I've heard it is best to mix in mono. I use FL Studio btw.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud
FREE DOWNLOADS ON MY SOUNDCLOUD.
http://www.facebook.com/daemthafknkim
http://www.soundcloud.com/daemthafknkim
Follow Twitter http://www.twitter.com/daemthafknkim Let me know who you are and I'll follow back!

User avatar
jrisreal
Posts: 4312
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:48 am
Location: the TARDIS

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by jrisreal » Thu Jan 26, 2012 11:58 pm

daeMTHAFKNkim wrote:How would you go about mixing in Mono? I've heard it is best to mix in mono. I use FL Studio btw.
I'd mix in stereo and do a separate mixdown in mono if the track gets big or something so that people can play it in clubs without problem...not saying this is the best advice, because I've never been put in that situation.
...in my opinion
Image
ImageImageImage

daeMTHAFKNkim
Posts: 855
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 12:42 am
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by daeMTHAFKNkim » Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:07 am

jrisreal wrote:
daeMTHAFKNkim wrote:How would you go about mixing in Mono? I've heard it is best to mix in mono. I use FL Studio btw.
I'd mix in stereo and do a separate mixdown in mono if the track gets big or something so that people can play it in clubs without problem...not saying this is the best advice, because I've never been put in that situation.
I meant like hearing it in Mono through your headphones while mixing but it's still stereo/you just gotta disable the Mono setting however you do that. If ya know what I mean :F .
Soundcloud
Soundcloud
FREE DOWNLOADS ON MY SOUNDCLOUD.
http://www.facebook.com/daemthafknkim
http://www.soundcloud.com/daemthafknkim
Follow Twitter http://www.twitter.com/daemthafknkim Let me know who you are and I'll follow back!

User avatar
jrisreal
Posts: 4312
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:48 am
Location: the TARDIS

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by jrisreal » Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:09 am

daeMTHAFKNkim wrote:
jrisreal wrote:
daeMTHAFKNkim wrote:How would you go about mixing in Mono? I've heard it is best to mix in mono. I use FL Studio btw.
I'd mix in stereo and do a separate mixdown in mono if the track gets big or something so that people can play it in clubs without problem...not saying this is the best advice, because I've never been put in that situation.
I meant like hearing it in Mono through your headphones while mixing but it's still stereo/you just gotta disable the Mono setting however you do that. If ya know what I mean :F .
That's how I meant it, too. ;-)
If the final output of the mix is going to be in stereo, mix in stereo. If the final output of the mix is going to be mono, mix in mono.
...in my opinion
Image
ImageImageImage

daeMTHAFKNkim
Posts: 855
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 12:42 am
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by daeMTHAFKNkim » Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:13 am

jrisreal wrote:
daeMTHAFKNkim wrote:
jrisreal wrote:
daeMTHAFKNkim wrote:How would you go about mixing in Mono? I've heard it is best to mix in mono. I use FL Studio btw.
I'd mix in stereo and do a separate mixdown in mono if the track gets big or something so that people can play it in clubs without problem...not saying this is the best advice, because I've never been put in that situation.
I meant like hearing it in Mono through your headphones while mixing but it's still stereo/you just gotta disable the Mono setting however you do that. If ya know what I mean :F .
That's how I meant it, too. ;-)
If the final output of the mix is going to be in stereo, mix in stereo. If the final output of the mix is going to be mono, mix in mono.
Lol oh. Well I guess but I just wanted to try it. Some artist named Laidback Luke had a video and he says he mixes/masters with his headphones and he puts it in Mono because it's more accurate than it being stereo with headphones on because the perceptions are off or something like that. Then he does the finishing touches in Stereo mixing. o_o
Soundcloud
Soundcloud
FREE DOWNLOADS ON MY SOUNDCLOUD.
http://www.facebook.com/daemthafknkim
http://www.soundcloud.com/daemthafknkim
Follow Twitter http://www.twitter.com/daemthafknkim Let me know who you are and I'll follow back!

skimpi
Posts: 4241
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:25 am

Re: Mono vs. Stereo

Post by skimpi » Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:25 am

daeMTHAFKNkim wrote:
jrisreal wrote:
daeMTHAFKNkim wrote:
jrisreal wrote:
daeMTHAFKNkim wrote:How would you go about mixing in Mono? I've heard it is best to mix in mono. I use FL Studio btw.
I'd mix in stereo and do a separate mixdown in mono if the track gets big or something so that people can play it in clubs without problem...not saying this is the best advice, because I've never been put in that situation.
I meant like hearing it in Mono through your headphones while mixing but it's still stereo/you just gotta disable the Mono setting however you do that. If ya know what I mean :F .
That's how I meant it, too. ;-)
If the final output of the mix is going to be in stereo, mix in stereo. If the final output of the mix is going to be mono, mix in mono.
Lol oh. Well I guess but I just wanted to try it. Some artist named Laidback Luke had a video and he says he mixes/masters with his headphones and he puts it in Mono because it's more accurate than it being stereo with headphones on because the perceptions are off or something like that. Then he does the finishing touches in Stereo mixing. o_o
That might be because when using headphones the stereo field is exaggerated do you essentially having a speaker in each ear, rather than having them spaced infront of you. So he may do his main composition and mixing in mono when using headphones at home or whatever. Then do the last few things such as panning and stereo processing, in stereo with some monitors.
TopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming
OiOiii #BELTER

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests