Random Production Tips Thread™
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: Random Production Tips Thread™
limiting the output is often a good idea when experimenting with sounds as some people on here blew their speaker cones while resampling and shit (basic A i remember posted something horrible about this)
a tip thats remotely related to production itself... if u read digital books or pdfs... print the stuff u read and put annotations to paper... the best way to learn shit properly is to see the LINKS between the concepts... if u dont want to print, just use a pdf reader that allows u to use colors and shit o highlight.. otherwise ur often just reading words.. unless ur like reallllly motivated and highly focused
a tip thats remotely related to production itself... if u read digital books or pdfs... print the stuff u read and put annotations to paper... the best way to learn shit properly is to see the LINKS between the concepts... if u dont want to print, just use a pdf reader that allows u to use colors and shit o highlight.. otherwise ur often just reading words.. unless ur like reallllly motivated and highly focused
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm
Random processing tip of the day
If you have an analog emulation plugin / actual hardware and a plugin that is boosting the high end in the same chain.
Strongly consider placing the emulation / hardware after the eq to avoid silly amounts of noise in the signal chain.

Strongly consider placing the emulation / hardware after the eq to avoid silly amounts of noise in the signal chain.

Re: Random processing tip of the day
My tip is to always use an EQ first and last in your signal chain because that's just how it goes.
Re: Random processing tip of the day
EQ before compression, just seems the right thing to do.

Soundcloud
Soundcloud: http://soundcloud.com/jaime-lee
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Jamie-Le ... 0701559456
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/JayleeHz
Re: Random processing tip of the day
I predict that this thread will blow up into a huge billion-page thread with people giving random pieces of advice each day
Annnnndddd my random tip of the day is that I've recently found that compression is overrated, and it cam generally be created with better results through EQ.
And EQ is everything.

Annnnndddd my random tip of the day is that I've recently found that compression is overrated, and it cam generally be created with better results through EQ.
And EQ is everything.
Re: Random processing tip of the day
It really is tbh.Sonika wrote:I predict that this thread will blow up into a huge billion-page thread with people giving random pieces of advice each day![]()
Annnnndddd my random tip of the day is that I've recently found that compression is overrated, and it cam generally be created with better results through EQ.
And EQ is everything.
Re: Random processing tip of the day
I imagine this would be quite closely related.Sonika wrote:I predict that this thread will blow up into a huge billion-page thread with people giving random pieces of advice each day![]()
Annnnndddd my random tip of the day is that I've recently found that compression is overrated, and it cam generally be created with better results through EQ.
And EQ is everything.
http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=26214

Soundcloud
Soundcloud: http://soundcloud.com/jaime-lee
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Jamie-Le ... 0701559456
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/JayleeHz
- Volatile Psycle
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:33 am
- Location: Norwich, UK
Re: Random processing tip of the day
not always as compression can actually bring out certain frequencies (generally lower)jaimelee wrote:EQ before compression, just seems the right thing to do.
plus if you change any of the eq later in the mix it can drastically change the behaviour of the compressor
Re: Random processing tip of the day
Always keep a spectrum analyzer on the master buss to help aid in mix decisions on the go.Also sub groups for drums,bass/mid....make mixing at the end hassle free,well for me at least.Also bounce as you go to free up processing power.
Re: Random processing tip of the day
Parallel processing when making bass lines is how i work,use sends then any processes you do you always have a mix of the wet/dry signal,i find this a much better way of layering a sound than long plugin chains on the channel with the dry signal,this way can get messy veryvery quickly.Also less is more when using distortion and other destructive signal processes.
Re: Random processing tip of the day
For me, less is more when it comes to production. I used to go all hardcore on technical stuff when trying to make music, like sidechaining the sub to the kick or w/e and always compressing things, but if I just go at it and THEN worry about all the technical stuff, it's way better. I barely use compression or sidechaining anymore and my music is better than ever.
Re: Random processing tip of the day
Yeah i hear you,if i want my kik to fit my sub i just pick a sample that won't clash anyway then my low end stays mud free.Although creative sidechaining is still a good process to use.Pumping pads and what not is still a very sexy sound.ChadDub wrote:For me, less is more when it comes to production. I used to go all hardcore on technical stuff when trying to make music, like sidechaining the sub to the kick or w/e and always compressing things, but if I just go at it and THEN worry about all the technical stuff, it's way better. I barely use compression or sidechaining anymore and my music is better than ever.
Re: Random processing tip of the day
Ha. Just wait until you do something with any live instruments or vocalists.Sonika wrote: Annnnndddd my random tip of the day is that I've recently found that compression is overrated, and it cam generally be created with better results through EQ.
And EQ is everything.
My tip is... um... compression is awesome, learn to use it properly. It can make drums hits (especially kicks) sound massive, it can help fit things into your box, it can hold your mix together when used on tracks with inconsistent volume, it can make two layered sounds sound like one, etc. etc.
Don't underestimate compression, especially when you're a newb. It's a little conceited to claim that one of the most used studio tools is overrated when you've only been producing for, like, six months and have never mixed or recorded a full band, don't you think?
- Samuel_L_Damnson
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:53 pm
- Location: YORKSHIRE!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Random processing tip of the day
^what he said
.

- JTMMusicuk
- Posts: 3008
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:41 pm
- Location: Newcastle
- Contact:
Re: Random processing tip of the day
iv been producing for like 6 years and yeah compression is over-ratedhudson wrote:Ha. Just wait until you do something with any live instruments or vocalists.Sonika wrote: Annnnndddd my random tip of the day is that I've recently found that compression is overrated, and it cam generally be created with better results through EQ.
And EQ is everything.
My tip is... um... compression is awesome, learn to use it properly. It can make drums hits (especially kicks) sound massive, it can help fit things into your box, it can hold your mix together when used on tracks with inconsistent volume, it can make two layered sounds sound like one, etc. etc.
Don't underestimate compression, especially when you're a newb. It's a little conceited to claim that one of the most used studio tools is overrated when you've only been producing for, like, six months and have never mixed or recorded a full band, don't you think?
Re: Random processing tip of the day
my tip:
EQ and compression as friends:
compression is a major part of my production. it can transform even the most piddly sounding kick drum or snare sample into a monster. and if you are using it correctly most people don't notice.
.... EQ is VERY important for pulling off that effect. if you are heavily compressing a sound and it has some SERIOUSLY resonating frequencies (for example, 200hz in a snare drum), I leave them in there PRE compression and I remove them afterwards, because unless you are using a multiband, they are most likley the frequencies that are setting off the compressor the most and if you remove them pre EQ it may seriously change your compression effect....
EQ and compression as friends:
compression is a major part of my production. it can transform even the most piddly sounding kick drum or snare sample into a monster. and if you are using it correctly most people don't notice.

Re: Random processing tip of the day
Work fast, pay someone to fix your problems.
Re: Random processing tip of the day
Definitely make a DAW preset that you can use every time you start a project. Gives you a great work flow. Speeds everything up.
And how will you inquire into a thing when you are wholly ignorant of what it is? Even if you happen to bump right into it, how will you know it is the thing you didn't know?
Re: Random processing tip of the day
hudson wrote:Ha. Just wait until you do something with any live instruments or vocalists.Sonika wrote: Annnnndddd my random tip of the day is that I've recently found that compression is overrated, and it cam generally be created with better results through EQ.
And EQ is everything.
My tip is... um... compression is awesome, learn to use it properly. It can make drums hits (especially kicks) sound massive, it can help fit things into your box, it can hold your mix together when used on tracks with inconsistent volume, it can make two layered sounds sound like one, etc. etc.
Don't underestimate compression, especially when you're a newb. It's a little conceited to claim that one of the most used studio tools is overrated when you've only been producing for, like, six months and have never mixed or recorded a full band, don't you think?
Jesus. I'm not being conceited, I'm just stating that in my very limited experience, I've found that EQ yields better results than compression.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests