The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
hasezwei
Posts: 2615
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by hasezwei » Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:47 pm

all i've heard so far is 160 so i'd stick to that. and wasnt dubstep 138?

Isley
Posts: 174
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Albany, New York

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by Isley » Mon Feb 20, 2012 1:37 am

Warp some footwork tracks on ableton and look at where they place their hits.

User avatar
sigbowls
Posts: 11188
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 7:31 am
Location: sigland

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by sigbowls » Mon Feb 20, 2012 1:52 am

some people think its cigarette bpm if its 4x4
blazen the raisin

User avatar
Mushroom Buttons
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:17 am

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by Mushroom Buttons » Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:35 am

140 Juke sounds good. I'm sure you've listened to Addison Groove's stuff. 140 or 150 or 160 are just general guideline though. one has to feel the tempo and adjust accordingly :6:

Also, sometimes a track produced in slower tempo can 'feel' faster if you shuffle the rhythm.
Mushroom Buttons - No Comply (Redux)
Soundcloud

User avatar
Mushroom Buttons
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:17 am

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by Mushroom Buttons » Mon Feb 20, 2012 5:31 am

Oh btw, if Phil Collins does juke

Mushroom Buttons - No Comply (Redux)
Soundcloud

User avatar
Mushroom Buttons
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:17 am

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by Mushroom Buttons » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:46 am

Teacher / juke producer breaks it down

http://jazner.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/ ... -footwork/
Mushroom Buttons - No Comply (Redux)
Soundcloud

wolf89
Posts: 10287
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:18 pm

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by wolf89 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 6:40 pm

Mushroom Buttons wrote:Teacher / juke producer breaks it down

http://jazner.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/ ... -footwork/
Literally just came here to post this as it's the most clear explanation of footwork and juke (seems a lot of people are still clueless to the difference between the two).

Footwork is really what a lot of people here are more into. Although a lot of stuff mentioned in this thread isn't really either (Addison groove isn't footwork/juke at 140 it's just bass music influenced by those styles)

glottis5
Posts: 932
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:33 am
Contact:

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by glottis5 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:49 pm

"how to produce x" threads bother me because it's like you're reducing making a genre down to a formula and a set of guidelines. can't be good for creativity or innovation.

glottis5
Posts: 932
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:33 am
Contact:

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by glottis5 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:55 pm

that said, heavy 808 bass, cool, interesting percussion, a tripleted feel, a bit of swagger and you're on your way

User avatar
Sonika
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:00 pm
Contact:

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by Sonika » Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:35 pm

hasezwei wrote:all i've heard so far is 160 so i'd stick to that. and wasnt dubstep 138?


Yeah in very early stages
Image

"The idea is to remain in a state of constant departure while always arriving."
-Waking Life

follow me
friend me

User avatar
societyloser1
Posts: 276
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by societyloser1 » Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:22 pm

The coolest thing about the whole Juke/Footwork thing is, you don't have to follow lots of rules 'to fit in'... So It's a genre with lots of potential and grow possibilities!

This is my take on the genre... And I just loved making it!
It's more like 3 songs in one and I made it really fast (2 hours)

Soundcloud

So yeah, I would say don't listen to the shit and don't read to much about it... Just open your daw, get the groove going and try new things out! Be creative... The mixdown doesn't matter!
707.Juno6.MS20 one take jam
Soundcloud

hasezwei
Posts: 2615
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by hasezwei » Fri Apr 20, 2012 10:44 am

societyloser1 wrote:The coolest thing about the whole Juke/Footwork thing is, you don't have to follow lots of rules 'to fit in'... So It's a genre with lots of potential and grow possibilities!

This is my take on the genre... And I just loved making it!
It's more like 3 songs in one and I made it really fast (2 hours)

Soundcloud

So yeah, I would say don't listen to the shit and don't read to much about it... Just open your daw, get the groove going and try new things out! Be creative... The mixdown doesn't matter!
nice one! digging your style, you should keep doing this stuff :4:

have a 3-tunes-in-1 demo too, all unfinished (actually working on them at the moment)
Soundcloud

if anyone's got questions go ahead, i have no secrets.

hasezwei
Posts: 2615
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by hasezwei » Sat Apr 21, 2012 1:16 am

time for an update. this time its bout what i'd call 'straight juke' or non-footworking tracks. ghetto house, whatever.





just to show you guys juke isnt all about dotted 808's and pitchshifted samples repeated ad nauseum :4:

User avatar
narcissus
Posts: 1654
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 5:28 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, CA

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by narcissus » Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:01 am

man. all this fuss over tempo. i dunno even know what there is to say about footwork production. if you listen to some real raw chicago footwork style, it's incredibly simple. painfully simple. heavy 808s. maybe a 909 hat. use any sample that could be used in hip-hop. lots of syncopated rhythms.
it's basically just techno that never left the area and has been stewing in the pot for 20 odd years. the story is that it became faster because DJs in strip clubs wanted to make the dancers move quicker.

i think it's a very fun style, and you're in the right territory as long as the bass in your track is supplied by 808 or similar and you have some really groovy and energetic rhythm that underpins it.. it's cool that it's coming up a lil bit, i personally had to go exploring every dance style that exists just to find out about it. it's amazing in that it takes such simple, common elements, and blends them in a unique and distinctive way, which means it is easy to put a little of its flavor in your tracks if you can feel it.

basically i would say the most important part of a juke mix or track, is the rhythm change. when the clap goes from 2 n 4 to just 3. very important and heavy.
my sig tracks has some footwerk influence, although it may be overshadowed by other styles. it's definitely going to be something in the collective musical consciousness in the years to come.

GalacticZack
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:07 am

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by GalacticZack » Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:06 am

A lot of it depends on whether you're trying to make Chicago-style tracks or newer more UK bass influenced stuff. If you're going for the UK sound, just do whatever you would normally do, speed it up to 160, and make the beat a juke pattern. A lot of that stuff is alright, but it's definitely not my area, so I don't have too much to add about it.

For more Chicago-esque tracks, the samples that you use (especially drum samples) are as important as what you do with them. Someone above said that the production can be "painfully simple" -- but if that's the route you take, things are going to sound just like that: painful and simple.

Anyway, here's one of my tracks, to give you an idea of where I'm coming from.

Soundcloud

User avatar
hysteriaa
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:14 am
Location: detroit
Contact:

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by hysteriaa » Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:28 am

never even heard of this, pretty sick though might give it a try.

hutyluty
Posts: 5240
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: LEEDS

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by hutyluty » Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:30 am

In the club at 11 oclock, tryna kick but im kinda early.
[+] Spoiler
Phigure wrote:nothing was ever good

User avatar
narcissus
Posts: 1654
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 5:28 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, CA

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by narcissus » Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:16 pm

no i was saying: it can be painfully simple, but it's good fun all the same

User avatar
NW_DUBAHOLIC
Posts: 878
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:11 pm
Location: Tacoma, Washington, USA

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by NW_DUBAHOLIC » Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:44 pm

This thread inspired me to make something :corndance:
I'll post it when i'm done.
Topamax
Soundcloud
Cornbreadddd wrote:I'm known to rim a lot of producers on here

User avatar
dickman69
Posts: 14517
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:58 am
Location: Pittsburgh

Re: The Juke/Footwork Production Thread

Post by dickman69 » Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:49 pm

all i know is that making actual chicago juke music like the ghettotek shit is fucking HARD TO DO

many fine lines that can't be crossed

and people talk shit on how simple it is

everyone in dis thread knows :w:
every Tuesday 11pm EST on http://cosmicsound.club

buy my tunes pls
Soundcloud

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests