EQ
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
Gorō Masamune
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 3:55 pm
- Location: Unknown
EQ
This is a question for a professional.
About where should the following portions of a track sit in the EQ range for everything to have a decent balance/space for each other:
1. Hi Hats
2. Percussion
3. Kicks
4. Snares
5. Lead Synths
6. Sub Bass
7. Heavy Basslines
8. FX
And any other sounds I'm leaving out that you'd like to mention. I feel this is a question that will help many producers.
PLEASE only reply with comments that progress the topic & if you feel aggravated by the question just ignore it & move on. Thanks.
About where should the following portions of a track sit in the EQ range for everything to have a decent balance/space for each other:
1. Hi Hats
2. Percussion
3. Kicks
4. Snares
5. Lead Synths
6. Sub Bass
7. Heavy Basslines
8. FX
And any other sounds I'm leaving out that you'd like to mention. I feel this is a question that will help many producers.
PLEASE only reply with comments that progress the topic & if you feel aggravated by the question just ignore it & move on. Thanks.
Soundcloud
Pai Mei said:
It's the wood that should fear your hand, not the other way around. Therefore it is the DAW that should fear your mind.
Re: EQ
Are you asking for what order they should appear, or the freq range that each element should appear in?
-
Gorō Masamune
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 3:55 pm
- Location: Unknown
Re: EQ
Frequency range. My bad I actually meant to say that.wub wrote:Are you asking for what order they should appear, or the freq range that each element should appear in?
Soundcloud
Pai Mei said:
It's the wood that should fear your hand, not the other way around. Therefore it is the DAW that should fear your mind.
Re: EQ
Does this graph help - http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_GD7kgG_0bkc/S ... Sounds.jpg ?
-
Gorō Masamune
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 3:55 pm
- Location: Unknown
Re: EQ
You couldn't have given a better fucking reply. Cheerswub wrote:Does this graph help - http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_GD7kgG_0bkc/S ... Sounds.jpg ?
Soundcloud
Pai Mei said:
It's the wood that should fear your hand, not the other way around. Therefore it is the DAW that should fear your mind.
Re: EQ
No worries 
- OfficialDAPT
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 2:51 am
Re: EQ
Do you know of a more dubstep based one of those? One that factors in all some of the crazy sounds used in the recent dubstep scene.wub wrote:No worries
7 year old BROstep/Trapstep/Chillstep producer from India. Young. Talented. 7 Years Old. Super skilled for age. Signed to NOW22. Biography written in 3rd person on soundcloud OBVI. The next Skrillex. Wait I don't even like him anymore LOL. Super talented. Only 6 years old.
- Triphosphate
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:40 am
Re: EQ
Your ears. After you get some experience in the EQ field, you can lose the charts and work with a spectrum analyzer only.OfficialDAPT wrote:Do you know of a more dubstep based one of those? One that factors in all some of the crazy sounds used in the recent dubstep scene.wub wrote:No worries
DSF's foreign exchange student
Forthcoming Bassweight Recordings:
Soundcloud
Facebook
Forthcoming Bassweight Recordings:
Soundcloud
phaeleh wrote:Yeah I wanna hear it toobassbum wrote:The pheleleh tune I have never heard before and I did like it but its very simple and I could quickly recreate it.
- OfficialDAPT
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 2:51 am
Re: EQ
haha i'm not that retardedSonika wrote:you should have your sub bass sitting somewhere around 500 hz
7 year old BROstep/Trapstep/Chillstep producer from India. Young. Talented. 7 Years Old. Super skilled for age. Signed to NOW22. Biography written in 3rd person on soundcloud OBVI. The next Skrillex. Wait I don't even like him anymore LOL. Super talented. Only 6 years old.
Re: EQ
Forget the charts. You can get exact dubstep answers. Put a track in the style you like into your daw, view the waveform as a spectrogram if your daw has that ability or put a spectrograph on it, and listen to and watch the track. Jot down notes and fill in your questions. They playing a sub, where does it sit? 55hz, check. They play an edgy mid bass, where does it sit, 770hz, check. Wam. Do it for a few songs, as each is going to be different, but it'll give you a rough idea of where and how things can sit together.Gorō Masamune wrote:This is a question for a professional.
About where should the following portions of a track sit in the EQ range for everything to have a decent balance/space for each other:
1. Hi Hats
2. Percussion
3. Kicks
4. Snares
5. Lead Synths
6. Sub Bass
7. Heavy Basslines
8. FX
And any other sounds I'm leaving out that you'd like to mention. I feel this is a question that will help many producers.
PLEASE only reply with comments that progress the topic & if you feel aggravated by the question just ignore it & move on. Thanks.
I've been seeing a lot of analytical questions around here lately, and no one seems to be willing to use their daws as an analytical/study/educational tool. You can learn a lot looking at and working with audio in your daw, entirely not making music.
Why don't you do what I suggested and post up the results. Would be really dope and would help your fellow producers.
-
Gorō Masamune
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 3:55 pm
- Location: Unknown
Re: EQ
Yes I have seen spectrographs used before when guys want to see where their tracks are hitting brick wall, etc. If one can open in FL Studio 10, which I don't see any reason why it shouldn't, that actually sounds like a wise idea.Put a track in the style you like into your daw, view the waveform as a spectrogram if your daw has that ability or put a spectrograph on it, and listen to and watch the track. Jot down notes and fill in your questions. They playing a sub, where does it sit? 55hz, check. They play an edgy mid bass, where does it sit, 770hz, check. Wam. Do it for a few songs, as each is going to be different, but it'll give you a rough idea of where and how things can sit together.
Any suggestions where to find a good one?
Soundcloud
Pai Mei said:
It's the wood that should fear your hand, not the other way around. Therefore it is the DAW that should fear your mind.
-
Gorō Masamune
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 3:55 pm
- Location: Unknown
Re: EQ
Cool thanks. I'll experiment with it somenowaysj wrote:Drop the pro track into edison and hit S. You'll see a spectrogram rather than a waveform. Very very informative.
Soundcloud
Pai Mei said:
It's the wood that should fear your hand, not the other way around. Therefore it is the DAW that should fear your mind.
Re: EQ
1. Hi Hats: between 1k and 2k up to the top
2. Percussion: like 500 to 5k
3. Kicks: cut everything below about 60 to 70 and boost around 90-100, bit of top end around 5k
4. Snares: cut below 200 and really boost that, after that pretty much everything except the really highend
5. Lead Synths: dont really use leadsynths atm, but I'd try mid around 500 to high
6. Sub Bass: 0 to ~ 60-70
7. Heavy Basslines: i always cut them below 100 and fill out the rest except the highend again
8. FX: i always have them all over the place except the sub region, just listen to how they sound and fit
Well that generally works for me, listen to the sound of the tune in my sig and see if you like that EQing yourself, because that's all that matters!
2. Percussion: like 500 to 5k
3. Kicks: cut everything below about 60 to 70 and boost around 90-100, bit of top end around 5k
4. Snares: cut below 200 and really boost that, after that pretty much everything except the really highend
5. Lead Synths: dont really use leadsynths atm, but I'd try mid around 500 to high
6. Sub Bass: 0 to ~ 60-70
7. Heavy Basslines: i always cut them below 100 and fill out the rest except the highend again
8. FX: i always have them all over the place except the sub region, just listen to how they sound and fit
Well that generally works for me, listen to the sound of the tune in my sig and see if you like that EQing yourself, because that's all that matters!
Re: EQ
You can also drop a Fruity Parametric EQ 2 on the master and watch the frequencies. I do this from time to time. You can also take out or boost certain frequencies when you doing this.Gorō Masamune wrote:Cool thanks. I'll experiment with it somenowaysj wrote:Drop the pro track into edison and hit S. You'll see a spectrogram rather than a waveform. Very very informative.
aka blinkesko
Soundcloud
Jesus Loves Electro - Burning Love (Augment remix)
Spotify: http://spoti.fi/1m5GUjL
iTunes: http://bit.ly/1iHWose
Soundcloud
Jesus Loves Electro - Burning Love (Augment remix)
Spotify: http://spoti.fi/1m5GUjL
iTunes: http://bit.ly/1iHWose
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
