wub wrote:Warfare Dubstep wrote:I saw a lot of anti-Skrillex threads being locked.
figure of speech broidontreallygiveashit wrote:Yeah with their ears broWarfare Dubstep wrote:
Even a blind man could see what happened to Hip hop, to Drum and Bass!
Just remember.. The Beatles were popThe Tornado wrote:If you don't think there is good mainstream pop music, something is wrong with you.
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
Negative, go listen to LMFAOThe Tornado wrote:If you don't think there is good mainstream pop music, something is wrong with you.
Off the top of my head....Warfare Dubstep wrote:Please, name me a few.pulkpull wrote:Yes.Warfare Dubstep wrote: Is any music from mainstream good?
Edit: quite a lot, infact.
So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)Warfare Dubstep wrote:wub wrote:Warfare Dubstep wrote:I saw a lot of anti-Skrillex threads being locked.
Which ones?
http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=169207 (couldn't agree more with this guy)
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=167606
http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.p ... &p=2431522
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?f ... start=2020
and MORE
Yes, and threads as far back as the forum was started are still active, hence leaving your comment as being baseless.wub wrote:So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)Warfare Dubstep wrote:wub wrote:Warfare Dubstep wrote:I saw a lot of anti-Skrillex threads being locked.
Which ones?
http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=169207 (couldn't agree more with this guy)
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=167606
http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.p ... &p=2431522
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?f ... start=2020
and MORE
What did I say that was baselesss?Warfare Dubstep wrote:hence leaving your comment as being baseless.
Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but aren't your criticising Skrillex by requesting that threads that are against him are left open?Warfare Dubstep wrote:Point here is criticizers are free to speak their minds. The truth always has controversy following it
I find it funny how you've managed to become an outcast on a forum where the vast majority of registered users agree with your opinion...Warfare Dubstep wrote:Yes, and threads as far back as the forum was started are still active, hence leaving your comment as being baseless.wub wrote:So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)Warfare Dubstep wrote:wub wrote:Warfare Dubstep wrote:I saw a lot of anti-Skrillex threads being locked.
Which ones?
http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=169207 (couldn't agree more with this guy)
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=167606
http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.p ... &p=2431522
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?f ... start=2020
and MORE
Point here is criticizers are free to speak their minds. The truth always has controversy following it
Again, the truth on my part being anti-Skrillex threads are being locked. They deserve to be left open.wub wrote:What did I say that was baselesss?Warfare Dubstep wrote:hence leaving your comment as being baseless.
Pointing out I brought up a couple of threads from 2011, making it seem as a laughing matter. Read my previous response to it again.
Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but aren't your criticising Skrillex by requesting that threads that are against him are left open?Warfare Dubstep wrote:Point here is criticizers are free to speak their minds. The truth always has controversy following it
Or are you confusing opinion with 'truth'?
cmgoodman1226 wrote:I find it funny how you've managed to become an outcast on a forum where the vast majority of registered users agree with your opinion...Warfare Dubstep wrote: Yes, and threads as far back as the forum was started are still active, hence leaving your comment as being baseless.
Point here is criticizers are free to speak their minds. The truth always has controversy following it
true thatWhat did I say that was baseless?Warfare Dubstep wrote:Again, the truth on my part being anti-Skrillex threads are being locked. They deserve to be left open.wub wrote:What did I say that was baselesss?Warfare Dubstep wrote:hence leaving your comment as being baseless.
Pointing out I brought up a couple of threads from 2011, making it seem as a laughing matter. Read my previous response to it again.
Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but aren't your criticising Skrillex by requesting that threads that are against him are left open?Warfare Dubstep wrote:Point here is criticizers are free to speak their minds. The truth always has controversy following it
Or are you confusing opinion with 'truth'?
Opinion is Skrillex is wank stain.
AxeD wrote:post your awful taste in music you assholes
wobbles wrote::3
+1dubfordessert wrote:even MENTIONING "censorship" or "free speech" just because a forum moderator locked your thread makes you a tnuc imo
this isn't china, no one has turned twitter off, stop whining and go vlog about it or something
wub wrote:(Deux means two in European)
You kid right wub ?Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
