BURIAL

gravious · Post by **gravious** » Sat Mar 25, 2006 2:31 am

doomstep wrote:... I've gone back to making tracks wif soundrecorder in Win3.1 ...

No joke man, I used to use sound recorder to cut up breaks and samples. Pure basic!

And yeah, vibes and feeling over production anyday.

Since when was music "product" anyway? When did it stop being art? I must have missed that meeting.

hmmm... maybe I missed it cos I was stroking my chin

Doh!
hehe

doomstep · Post by **doomstep** » Sat Mar 25, 2006 3:39 am

gravious wrote:
doomstep wrote:... I've gone back to making tracks wif soundrecorder in Win3.1 ...
No joke man, I used to use sound recorder to cut up breaks and samples. Pure basic!

Yeah !!! I was serious as well, I went from pause tapes to sound recorder, having like 50 of em open and pasteing to the end of one file . . . those were the days, then I discovered trackers, I'm still recovering

soundrecorder massive stand up

numaestro · Post by **numaestro** » Sat Mar 25, 2006 11:41 am

Cool read - I'm so relieved that we've got back to the G word!!! Was getting worried that things were gonna get overun by the techno hordes. Seems likes there are peeps who ain't gonna chuck out the baby with the bathwater - looking forward to this LP.

nonseq · Post by **nonseq** » Sat Mar 25, 2006 5:01 pm

Great read! I had a period making music with just cooledit. It works ok, but yeah it amazes me he didnt switch to a sequencer.

dept of hell science · Post by **dept of hell science** » Sat Mar 25, 2006 10:26 pm

numaestro wrote:Cool read - I'm so relieved that we've got back to the G word!!! Was getting worried that things were gonna get overun by the techno hordes.

...what's the G word ???

autonomic · Post by **autonomic** » Sat Mar 25, 2006 11:38 pm

garridge

conspira · Post by **conspira** » Sun Mar 26, 2006 2:20 am

Dept of Hell Science wrote:
numaestro wrote:Cool read - I'm so relieved that we've got back to the G word!!! Was getting worried that things were gonna get overun by the techno hordes.
...what's the G word ???

Groove

kuma · Post by **kuma** » Sun Mar 26, 2006 2:29 am

Dept of Hell Science wrote:
numaestro wrote:Cool read - I'm so relieved that we've got back to the G word!!! Was getting worried that things were gonna get overun by the techno hordes.
...what's the G word ???

Goats.

j_j · Post by **j_j** » Sun Mar 26, 2006 4:15 am

South London Boroughs E.P is the bollocks !!! big up Burial ...if only i could hear this off a fuzzy rinse stream at 4 am ...id prob start bombing again..!!! BIG!!

autonomic · Post by **autonomic** » Sun Mar 26, 2006 2:44 pm

Kuma wrote:Goats.

whoops. my bad

drewdrops · Post by **drewdrops** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:02 am

tasty interview, big ups blackdown and burial!

boomnoise · Post by **boomnoise** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:35 am

album release date now May 15th

logos · Post by **logos** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:37 pm

boomnoise wrote:album release date now May 15th

Month and a half away!

I was listening to the hyperdub ep in my headphones last night...depth and texture bizniz.

autonomic · Post by **autonomic** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:53 pm

Logos wrote:depth and texture bizniz.

i always thought there was a density to those tracks that was a different from other stuff out there. the elements aren't really isolated in their own acoustic spaces (take a loefah or plasticman track as a pronounced example of that sort of spectral/spatial work). i guess that's largely a result of those engineering methods. on a multitrack it's easy to EQ everything into their own space, but copy/paste on a 2-track makes that type of arrangement very difficult without a huge amount of pre-planning, especially when you've got a lot of midrange stuff going on.

logos · Post by **logos** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:59 pm

autonomic wrote:
Logos wrote:depth and texture bizniz.
i always thought there was a density to those tracks that was a different from other stuff out there. the elements aren't really isolated in their own acoustic spaces (take a loefah or plasticman track as a pronounced example of that sort of spectral/spatial work). i guess that's largely a result of those engineering methods. on a multitrack it's easy to EQ everything into their own space, but shift+x/shift+p on a 2-track makes that type of arrangement very difficult without a huge amount of pre-planning, especially when you've got a lot of midrange stuff going on.

Yeah I think thats a really good analysis - its much more dense and interweaved like Eno's 'On Land' rather than the audio cubism of Loefah, D1 etc.

You really should give it a listen on decent headphones if you can...there's this whole other off-key chord sequence going on deep in the background of South London Boroughs that you can miss if you listen at moderate volume on speakers.

So looking forward to this LP.

ghettobot · Post by **ghettobot** » Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:02 pm

is there a tracklist for the album?

twenty3 · Post by **twenty3** » Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:53 pm

ghettobot wrote:is there a tracklist for the album?

nearly:
http://www.hyperdub.net/burial.html

ghettobot · Post by **ghettobot** » Mon Apr 10, 2006 4:59 am

more love for burial

orson · Post by **orson** » Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm

the album is fucking deeeeeep!!!!

zefa · Post by **zefa** » Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:05 pm

The breezeblock is practically all ive been listening to for days now, i cant wait for this album - its gonna HUGE!!!

BURIAL

Who is online