Wen: what's all the commotion about?
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
But do you guys really care about the tempo it sits in? Are you thinking that it would be better +10bpm when you are listening?
Surprised more people arent going crazy for this guy
Surprised more people arent going crazy for this guy
sub.wise:.
slow down
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
Wind It Up is one of the best tunes ive heard this year
Soundcloud
RKM wrote:i am feeling levels of remorse like one of the yutes in charlie and the chocolate factory
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
No see, that's what I mean. Tempos around 130 are mostly associated with house, UK funky and those other sounds while Wen clearly has more in common with dubstep than alot of the stuff that's getting produced these days.fractal wrote:But do you guys really care about the tempo it sits in? Are you thinking that it would be better +10bpm when you are listening?
fractal wrote:Surprised more people arent going crazy for this guy
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
bout time the bwoy is making some waves. sounds like hes got some big things in the pipeline!
allow me to plug the shit out of this while I'm here
nightcrawler is my shit.
allow me to plug the shit out of this while I'm here
nightcrawler is my shit.
jrkhnds wrote:- dubstepforum, 2014.and I've never really rated dubstep..
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
Hadn't heard the sounds of Wen before, amazing!
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
Big tune!epochalypso wrote:bout time the bwoy is making some waves. sounds like hes got some big things in the pipeline!
allow me to plug the shit out of this while I'm here
nightcrawler is my shit.
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
fractal wrote:But do you guys really care about the tempo it sits in? Are you thinking that it would be better +10bpm when you are listening?
Surprised more people arent going crazy for this guy
A little
Tempo makes a huge different in dance music, where everything is beat oriented
And from a DJ's perspective....well yeah
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
people don't knowSonika wrote:fractal wrote:But do you guys really care about the tempo it sits in? Are you thinking that it would be better +10bpm when you are listening?
Surprised more people arent going crazy for this guy
A little
Tempo makes a huge different in dance music, where everything is beat oriented
And from a DJ's perspective....well yeah
and believe me they do not care either
"If your chest ain't rattlin it ain't happenin'" - DJ Pinch
"Move pples bodies and stimulate their minds"
we just ride the wave
Life sucks; Get used² it.
big up your mum
"Move pples bodies and stimulate their minds"
we just ride the wave
Life sucks; Get used² it.
big up your mum
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
One can DEFINITELY tell the difference if its more then 5 or so BPM
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
i don't mean dj's sonika, I mean club goers. Of course we can tell the difference, we have been listening for it for years. when I was a hip hop/funk/soul dj I labeled the bpms of all of my records and in doing so, gained a really good ear for bpms...
but my point was that, in the dance, if a song is good its good. no one cares what bpm it is. in my opinion tempo cults are just as bad as genre cults and just as limiting.
songs bellow 140 give the beat room to breath and move, just look at dj abstracts touch, which sits closer to 130 than 140
dj's want songs to all be the same tempo so they don't have to work, but fuck that. there's a whole spectrum of sounds and speeds out there, figure out how to mix em well!
but my point was that, in the dance, if a song is good its good. no one cares what bpm it is. in my opinion tempo cults are just as bad as genre cults and just as limiting.
songs bellow 140 give the beat room to breath and move, just look at dj abstracts touch, which sits closer to 130 than 140
dj's want songs to all be the same tempo so they don't have to work, but fuck that. there's a whole spectrum of sounds and speeds out there, figure out how to mix em well!
sub.wise:.
slow down
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
- dubfordessert
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:07 pm
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
really liking this, ghosts of so many sounds in there
interview is nice too, like what he's got to say and the way he talks about music

interview is nice too, like what he's got to say and the way he talks about music
AxeD wrote:post your awful taste in music you assholes
wobbles wrote::3
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
dubfordessert wrote:...ghosts of so many sounds in there...
totally!
sub.wise:.
slow down
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
fractal wrote:i don't mean dj's sonika, I mean club goers. Of course we can tell the difference, we have been listening for it for years. when I was a hip hop/funk/soul dj I labeled the bpms of all of my records and in doing so, gained a really good ear for bpms...
but my point was that, in the dance, if a song is good its good. no one cares what bpm it is. in my opinion tempo cults are just as bad as genre cults and just as limiting.
songs bellow 140 give the beat room to breath and move, just look at dj abstracts touch, which sits closer to 130 than 140
dj's want songs to all be the same tempo so they don't have to work, but fuck that. there's a whole spectrum of sounds and speeds out there, figure out how to mix em well!
Fair but even from a casual listeners perspective, it completely influences the tune. In my DAW, when I slow down/speed up one of the tracks I'm working on only by a little bit, the track takes on entirely different dimensions, sometimes desirable and sometimes not.
Maybe I'm missing the point, but it seems to me that BPM is a large part of a track's identity, from anyone's perspective
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
And I think if a DJ used all the same BPM it would be boring as fuck
Good DJs change the tempo artfully throughout their set
Good DJs change the tempo artfully throughout their set
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
right, but you already had an idea of how the tune should sound. if you showed both versions to people who have not heard it before, results would vary i am sure. All i am saying is its ridiculous to hear a good tune at 130 and say "i wish this stuff was at 140" IMHO. good music = good music, get off of 140's dickSonika wrote:fractal wrote:i don't mean dj's sonika, I mean club goers. Of course we can tell the difference, we have been listening for it for years. when I was a hip hop/funk/soul dj I labeled the bpms of all of my records and in doing so, gained a really good ear for bpms...
but my point was that, in the dance, if a song is good its good. no one cares what bpm it is. in my opinion tempo cults are just as bad as genre cults and just as limiting.
songs bellow 140 give the beat room to breath and move, just look at dj abstracts touch, which sits closer to 130 than 140
dj's want songs to all be the same tempo so they don't have to work, but fuck that. there's a whole spectrum of sounds and speeds out there, figure out how to mix em well!
Fair but even from a casual listeners perspective, it completely influences the tune. In my DAW, when I slow down/speed up one of the tracks I'm working on only by a little bit, the track takes on entirely different dimensions, sometimes desirable and sometimes not.
Maybe I'm missing the point, but it seems to me that BPM is a large part of a track's identity, from anyone's perspective
sub.wise:.
slow down
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
Mate I will be riding 140's dick for a looong time 
I think we're arguing roughly the same point, just in different terms
point is, a track's tempo makes a difference to the vibe of the entire track
Imagine if Loefah's Goat Stare or Horror Show was 170?
I think we're arguing roughly the same point, just in different terms
Imagine if Loefah's Goat Stare or Horror Show was 170?
- dubfordessert
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:07 pm
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
what would these tunes sped up to 140 achieve - a little more urgency maybe, but maybe that's just not how he wants them to sound. here you get something a bit fuller and a bit subtler.
here we're talking a few bpm. the difference is noticeable but it's not huge - seems like a bit of a quibble to have a real problem with the tempo. if you're saying you like the sound but you're not quiiite feeling the vibe, fair enough. but you get the sense, somewhat, that people want 140 for the sake of having 140... there is so much going on at that tempo i think this is a bit of a breath of fresh air tbh
pretty extreme as an example. it would be a different track. no one listens to goat stare and says "man this is good, but it would be better if it were 170" - they go and listen to some dnbImagine if Loefah's Goat Stare or Horror Show was 170?
here we're talking a few bpm. the difference is noticeable but it's not huge - seems like a bit of a quibble to have a real problem with the tempo. if you're saying you like the sound but you're not quiiite feeling the vibe, fair enough. but you get the sense, somewhat, that people want 140 for the sake of having 140... there is so much going on at that tempo i think this is a bit of a breath of fresh air tbh
AxeD wrote:post your awful taste in music you assholes
wobbles wrote::3
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
Dfd I think you're missing the object of my post a little
I wasn't saying at all that I have a problem with any one tempo - that would be fucking ridiculous
I was merely trying to say that a tempo defines a tune. I wasn't suggesting that I would wish any tune to be a different tempo, I'm just contesting the idea that tempo doesn't matter
I wasn't saying at all that I have a problem with any one tempo - that would be fucking ridiculous
I was merely trying to say that a tempo defines a tune. I wasn't suggesting that I would wish any tune to be a different tempo, I'm just contesting the idea that tempo doesn't matter
- Cornbreadddd
- Posts: 1376
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:06 pm
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
Fractal I see your point, and originally I didn't really consider, or think about it like that. But I suppose I still side with Sonika a bit more on this. Fractal, you're definitely right, good music is good music, regardless of the tempo. However I think it's a psychological thing, for me at least. I feel like certain tunes would mean a lot more to me, or be much more unique to my ears if they were at 140 opposed to say, 130. It's because, a lot of 130 stuff is really experimental, and unusual, so it's nothing new there. But if that same vibe, sound, and creativity was brought up to 140, psychologically, the tune would grasp my attention much more. Does that make sense? This is just my personal mental connection to 140 so I'm obviously not speaking for anybody else.
- dubfordessert
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:07 pm
Re: Wen: what's all the commotion about?
i'm not really disagreeing with that. my point is basically that music is not made to order. the music is at that tempo for a reason, and really asking for it to be at a different tempo is asking for different music...Sonika wrote:Dfd I think you're missing the object of my post a little
I wasn't saying at all that I have a problem with any one tempo - that would be fucking ridiculous
I was merely trying to say that a tempo defines a tune. I wasn't suggesting that I would wish any tune to be a different tempo, I'm just contesting the idea that tempo doesn't matter
AxeD wrote:post your awful taste in music you assholes
wobbles wrote::3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
