how do you approach new genres?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- Aufnahmewindwuschel
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
- Location: Antarctica
Re: how do you approach new genres?
that sums it up!
Re: how do you approach new genres?
I say just go for it. Unknowingly bastardize and insult the genre as much as you can by adding your own ignorant spin on it. Like when actors refuse to read source material on characters they're playing so they're their own.
Re: how do you approach new genres?
My life story
Soundcloud
♫•*¨*•.¸¸ This is a special Proper HQ Recording by myself !!! ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪*
Re: how do you approach new genres?
Its really depressing how dismissive/clueless most Americans seem to be about dance music, especially considering how they pretty much invented it.AxeD wrote:Thought you meant like deep house and stuff. Guetta is closer to skrillex than to the average deep house track.
There are some american definitions where:
Everything = Techno
Techno with vocals = house
But they are ridiculous. Like wormcode said, Frankie Knuckles n stuff. But there also a lot of modern day equivalents.
I met a guy from detroit last year who seemed to have no idea that techno originated there (however, he had been to a "techno" show recently though "some people were calling it dub stop?")
Re: how do you approach new genres?
Me neither, seems crazy but Youtube comments don't liebkwsk wrote:Knuckles, Negro, Pooley, Tonka, Ben Watt, Shapeshifters, Hott 22, Falke, Axwell...AxeD wrote:Frankie Knuckles n stuff
IDK, I can hardly think of house as being techno with vocals. Impossible for me.

Agent 47 wrote:Next time I can think of something, I will.
- Aufnahmewindwuschel
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
- Location: Antarctica
Re: how do you approach new genres?
like george clooney as batman?Attila wrote:I say just go for it. Unknowingly bastardize and insult the genre as much as you can by adding your own ignorant spin on it. Like when actors refuse to read source material on characters they're playing so they're their own.

yeah sorry for bringing guetta up its like bringing skrillex into a discussion about scorn
Re: how do you approach new genres?
AxeD and hutyluty, have you ever been to America?hutyluty wrote:Its really depressing how dismissive/clueless most Americans seem to be about dance music, especially considering how they pretty much invented it.AxeD wrote:Thought you meant like deep house and stuff. Guetta is closer to skrillex than to the average deep house track.
There are some american definitions where:
Everything = Techno
Techno with vocals = house
But they are ridiculous. Like wormcode said, Frankie Knuckles n stuff. But there also a lot of modern day equivalents.
I met a guy from detroit last year who seemed to have no idea that techno originated there (however, he had been to a "techno" show recently though "some people were calling it dub stop?")
Because those are some broad stereotypes you have going on there. I love how you all love to cut Americans from the same swath of cloth. There are loads of househeads and technoheads here. You will find them mostly in the cities. I'm not going to deny that there are a lot of clueless people that don't know electronic music, but there are loads of those people in Europe and England as well.
Which brings me back to the OP. Make what you want, but if you are going to make some music that you know nothing about and then say you are never going to make it again, then why bother? Just go to the house section of this board to see how mis-appropriated that term is, which is kind of an insult to all of the people who have spent years building that scene.
Re: how do you approach new genres?
It is a broad general statement, but it's not untrue lol. I think it's clear they meant the general mainstream MTV type people. They surely know there's dedicated people in the states, as there are everywhere.mks wrote:AxeD and hutyluty, have you ever been to America?
Because those are some broad stereotypes you have going on there. I love how you all love to cut Americans from the same swath of cloth. There are loads of househeads and technoheads here. You will find them mostly in the cities. I'm not going to deny that there are a lot of clueless people that don't know electronic music, but there are loads of those people in Europe and England as well.
Which brings me back to the OP. Make what you want, but if you are going to make some music that you know nothing about and then say you are never going to make it again, then why bother? Just go to the house section of this board to see how mis-appropriated that term is, which is kind of an insult to all of the people who have spent years building that scene.
Reminds me when I met this girl in LA who had a shirt that said I <3 HOUSE. The convo got around to naming fav tracks and artists, and she called out deadmouse tracks. I got her to check out some Chicago tracks and she called it too boring and slow.

- Aufnahmewindwuschel
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
- Location: Antarctica
Re: how do you approach new genres?
i highly doubt that i can insult anybody in themks wrote:AxeD and hutyluty, have you ever been to America?hutyluty wrote:Its really depressing how dismissive/clueless most Americans seem to be about dance music, especially considering how they pretty much invented it.AxeD wrote:Thought you meant like deep house and stuff. Guetta is closer to skrillex than to the average deep house track.
There are some american definitions where:
Everything = Techno
Techno with vocals = house
But they are ridiculous. Like wormcode said, Frankie Knuckles n stuff. But there also a lot of modern day equivalents.
I met a guy from detroit last year who seemed to have no idea that techno originated there (however, he had been to a "techno" show recently though "some people were calling it dub stop?")
Because those are some broad stereotypes you have going on there. I love how you all love to cut Americans from the same swath of cloth. There are loads of househeads and technoheads here. You will find them mostly in the cities. I'm not going to deny that there are a lot of clueless people that don't know electronic music, but there are loads of those people in Europe and England as well.
Which brings me back to the OG. Make what you want, but if you are going to make some music that you know nothing about and then say you are never going to make it again, then why bother? Just go to the house section of this board to see how mis-appropriated that term is, which is kind of an insult to all of the people who have spent years building that scene.

but if i insulted anybody i am internet sorry
Re: how do you approach new genres?
My point is that I'm not going to make some stupid beat in Fruity Loops and call it Jazz because I have too much respect for the music.
- Aufnahmewindwuschel
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
- Location: Antarctica
Re: how do you approach new genres?
haha i get what you mean man it was just that i felt to start something "houseesc" and wasnt sure how to approach it.
its more that i dont know much about it productionwise so it was more of a general question about how to approach any genre
and i dont hate on house its just that i dont think that i will keep my main interest on it productionwise
its like i like listening to neo classic but i dont have the skills to pull it off but for that comp the vibe of the tune i am starting fits so far
its more that i dont know much about it productionwise so it was more of a general question about how to approach any genre
and i dont hate on house its just that i dont think that i will keep my main interest on it productionwise
its like i like listening to neo classic but i dont have the skills to pull it off but for that comp the vibe of the tune i am starting fits so far
Re: how do you approach new genres?
I feel you, and I know those people are out there but just to be clear, not all Americans are like that.wormcode wrote:It is a broad general statement, but it's not untrue lol. I think it's clear they meant the general mainstream MTV type people. They surely know there's dedicated people in the states, as there are everywhere.mks wrote:AxeD and hutyluty, have you ever been to America?
Because those are some broad stereotypes you have going on there. I love how you all love to cut Americans from the same swath of cloth. There are loads of househeads and technoheads here. You will find them mostly in the cities. I'm not going to deny that there are a lot of clueless people that don't know electronic music, but there are loads of those people in Europe and England as well.
Which brings me back to the OP. Make what you want, but if you are going to make some music that you know nothing about and then say you are never going to make it again, then why bother? Just go to the house section of this board to see how mis-appropriated that term is, which is kind of an insult to all of the people who have spent years building that scene.
Reminds me when I met this girl in LA who had a shirt that said I <3 HOUSE. The convo got around to naming fav tracks and artists, and she called out deadmouse tracks. I got her to check out some Chicago tracks and she called it too boring and slow.Good times
Sometimes I feel that the people making these sort of comments have never even been here, and therefore do not really understand the sheer size of this place and the regional differences that go with that. I mean, my state is bigger than both of those countries and your state is bigger than all of Western Europe. Not that this has anything to do with music, but within that same space in Europe, you will go through several different languages and cultures.
Re: how do you approach new genres?
This I have donemks wrote:My point is that I'm not going to make some stupid beat in Fruity Loops and call it Jazz...

P.S. Like all British people my teeth look like that.
P.S.S. Getting butthurt over music is kool

OP do what the fuck you want, but never do what anyone on DSF tells you to do

2 keyboards 1 computer
Sure_Fire wrote:By the way does anyone have the stems to make it bun dem? Missed the beatport comp and would very much like the ego booster of saying I remixed Skrillex.
- Aufnahmewindwuschel
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
- Location: Antarctica
Re: how do you approach new genres?
shit now it gets paradox if i would follow your advice i would do what you tell me and by doing so i would do what somebody from DSF tells me to do3za wrote:OP do what the fuck you want, but never do what anyone on DSF tells you to do

Re: how do you approach new genres?
SPL was known as only a dnb producer for years and then released an industrial hardcore 12". Pure industrial hardcore. He HARDLY listened to any hardcore, it's just kinda what he heard associating with the Outside Agency and shit. Anyway, that 12" is a stone cold classic in industrial hardcore right now.
Sometimes, approaching a genre from a different angle where you haven't been exposed to the clichés and typical tips and tricks that the style if known for can make for some awesome results. In way, you'll be able to write whatever tune you like and not make the same mistakes other house producers make. Maybe you'll make your own mistakes, which may be nice to hear as well.
Even if you are planning to eventually get nto more house, postpone it after finishing the tune. Might be interesting to hear.
Sometimes, approaching a genre from a different angle where you haven't been exposed to the clichés and typical tips and tricks that the style if known for can make for some awesome results. In way, you'll be able to write whatever tune you like and not make the same mistakes other house producers make. Maybe you'll make your own mistakes, which may be nice to hear as well.
Even if you are planning to eventually get nto more house, postpone it after finishing the tune. Might be interesting to hear.

namsayin
:'0
Re: how do you approach new genres?
Fairly sure you can't accuse me of stereotyping, at least not by what I said heremks wrote:AxeD and hutyluty, have you ever been to America?hutyluty wrote:Its really depressing how dismissive/clueless most Americans seem to be about dance music, especially considering how they pretty much invented it.AxeD wrote:Thought you meant like deep house and stuff. Guetta is closer to skrillex than to the average deep house track.
There are some american definitions where:
Everything = Techno
Techno with vocals = house
But they are ridiculous. Like wormcode said, Frankie Knuckles n stuff. But there also a lot of modern day equivalents.
I met a guy from detroit last year who seemed to have no idea that techno originated there (however, he had been to a "techno" show recently though "some people were calling it dub stop?")
Because those are some broad stereotypes you have going on there. I love how you all love to cut Americans from the same swath of cloth. There are loads of househeads and technoheads here. You will find them mostly in the cities. I'm not going to deny that there are a lot of clueless people that don't know electronic music, but there are loads of those people in Europe and England as well.
Which brings me back to the OP. Make what you want, but if you are going to make some music that you know nothing about and then say you are never going to make it again, then why bother? Just go to the house section of this board to see how mis-appropriated that term is, which is kind of an insult to all of the people who have spent years building that scene.

It's just those weird definition of techno that seem quite populair, but I don't know anyone that uses them.
Around here there are quite a few people who confuse electro and electronic music, but that's kind of understandable to me.
Dub Stop sounds awesome though

Agent 47 wrote:Next time I can think of something, I will.
Re: how do you approach new genres?
You can't make mistakes in music;Genevieve wrote:SPL was known as only a dnb producer for years and then released an industrial hardcore 12". Pure industrial hardcore. He HARDLY listened to any hardcore, it's just kinda what he heard associating with the Outside Agency and shit. Anyway, that 12" is a stone cold classic in industrial hardcore right now.
Sometimes, approaching a genre from a different angle where you haven't been exposed to the clichés and typical tips and tricks that the style if known for can make for some awesome results. In way, you'll be able to write whatever tune you like and not make the same mistakes other house producers make. Maybe you'll make your own mistakes, which may be nice to hear as well.
Even if you are planning to eventually get nto more house, postpone it after finishing the tune. Might be interesting to hear.
"Dude you're totally out of fucking tune."
"Dude stfu I'm trying out a new microtunning."
"Dude You're totally out of fucking time"
"Dude stfu I'm trying out a new time signature."
"Dude you totally suck balls."
"Well that you can't prove."
2 keyboards 1 computer
Sure_Fire wrote:By the way does anyone have the stems to make it bun dem? Missed the beatport comp and would very much like the ego booster of saying I remixed Skrillex.
- Aufnahmewindwuschel
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
- Location: Antarctica
Re: how do you approach new genres?
thats a really nice tip manGenevieve wrote:SPL was known as only a dnb producer for years and then released an industrial hardcore 12". Pure industrial hardcore. He HARDLY listened to any hardcore, it's just kinda what he heard associating with the Outside Agency and shit. Anyway, that 12" is a stone cold classic in industrial hardcore right now.
Sometimes, approaching a genre from a different angle where you haven't been exposed to the clichés and typical tips and tricks that the style if known for can make for some awesome results. In way, you'll be able to write whatever tune you like and not make the same mistakes other house producers make. Maybe you'll make your own mistakes, which may be nice to hear as well.
Even if you are planning to eventually get nto more house, postpone it after finishing the tune. Might be interesting to hear.
yeah i guess i will work on it and see how it turns out if its shit atleast i had fun doing this shit if its worth to go on the comp its


Re: how do you approach new genres?
Personally the way I approach new genres is just to make what you think it should sound like. It's not like I venture too far from what I like, but for a challenge I sometimes take a genre I can't stand like trance and try to make a track I would actually want to listen to. I actually I find it inspiring to do stuff like this and you can only add more to your bag of tricks by venturing out of your comfort zone.
Re: how do you approach new genres?
no. why ? because it's mainstream? those producers know what they are doing. there is nothing wrong with getting a feel for the genre by just listening to what is selling well apparently.ehbrums1 wrote:Your shitting me right ?DIGIPLAST wrote:so my tip is: listen to the latest house tracks on beatport or similar sites to get a feel for the genre.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests