London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
Every kid in Jamaica right now is going to want to be a sprinter, expect them to dominate for a long time

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
What? That has nothing to do with what we are talking about (plus it is controversial for many reasons). Can't help but feel you are clutching at straws there.ehbrums1 wrote:That's not after example, Jamaica is extremely shady in their doping regulations
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
No your trying to give an example for why they were dominant in sprinting and not other events, and all I'm saying is that they've been known to be pretty relaxed on the regulations
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
And I'm saying that's awful rationalisation. And you don't think practically every sprinter in the world at some point takes some form of performance enhancer?ehbrums1 wrote:No your trying to give an example for why they were dominant in sprinting and not other events, and all I'm saying is that they've been known to be pretty relaxed on the regulations
Anyway, like I say, that is poor reasoning. They are dominant because every kid wants to grow up as a sprinter in the same way every kid wants to grow up to be a footballer in the UK.
- Hedley King
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
Yeah but the point people are making is that population and funding are the main factors rather than some inherent athletic superiority or sexual equality in the USA that doesn't exist elsewhere (only just over half the USA medals were from women- and about half of the olympic medals go to women so it isn't anything that surprising what they did).ehbrums1 wrote:US 104 medals....
USA population 311 million: 104 medals....if there was some weird NW Europe combined team of UK, France and Germany it'd have population 210 million and 142 medals.....I'm sure people could go on with those sort of stats all over the place, USA women did very well, but to say that they are leaps and bounds ahead of the rest of the world because of some equality law seems a bit far fetched.
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
pkay is talking about a difference in culture more than anything else. He certainly isn't talking about inherent athletic superiority.Hedley King wrote:Yeah but the point people are making is that population and funding are the main factors rather than some inherent athletic superiority or sexual equality in the USA that doesn't exist elsewhere (only just over half the USA medals were from women- and about half of the olympic medals go to women so it isn't anything that surprising what they did).ehbrums1 wrote:US 104 medals....
USA population 311 million: 104 medals....if there was some weird NW Europe combined team of UK, France and Germany it'd have population 210 million and 142 medals.....I'm sure people could go on with those sort of stats all over the place, USA women did very well, but to say that they are leaps and bounds ahead of the rest of the world because of some equality law seems a bit far fetched.
*edit, misread post
- Hedley King
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
No, I get that- mostly I was taking it that he says some US equality law is the reason USA women do so well, I'm saying that they don't do so especially well and that there are loads of other factors, and most of the western world has similar equality lawshugh wrote:pkay is talking about a difference in culture more than anything else. He certainly isn't talking about inherent athletic superiority. I think you misunderstand him.Hedley King wrote:Yeah but the point people are making is that population and funding are the main factors rather than some inherent athletic superiority or sexual equality in the USA that doesn't exist elsewhere (only just over half the USA medals were from women- and about half of the olympic medals go to women so it isn't anything that surprising what they did).ehbrums1 wrote:US 104 medals....
USA population 311 million: 104 medals....if there was some weird NW Europe combined team of UK, France and Germany it'd have population 210 million and 142 medals.....I'm sure people could go on with those sort of stats all over the place, USA women did very well, but to say that they are leaps and bounds ahead of the rest of the world because of some equality law seems a bit far fetched.
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
I highly doubt Jamaica has the same sort of funding as the US do for their runners. you guys are seriously deluded.hugh wrote:How do you explain Jamaica winning so many track and field events? Answer > They invest a lot in track in field compared to other sports because sprinting is their national sport.
- Sexual_Chocolate
- Posts: 17019
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:57 pm
- Location: Label A City
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
there is a serious amount of money put into running in Jamaica... but its ONLY for the people at the very top eg Bolt.Molzie wrote:I highly doubt Jamaica has the same sort of funding as the US do for their runners. you guys are seriously deluded.hugh wrote:How do you explain Jamaica winning so many track and field events? Answer > They invest a lot in track in field compared to other sports because sprinting is their national sport.
SoundcloudLaszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
https://labelarecs.bandcamp.com
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
I am saying it is a combination of culture and funding. If a sport is highly popular and highly funded in any given country in relativity to any other country then they will certainly achieve more in that sport than the other country. There's no delusion here, gtfo with that bull.Molzie wrote:I highly doubt Jamaica has the same sort of funding as the US do for their runners. you guys are seriously deluded.hugh wrote:How do you explain Jamaica winning so many track and field events? Answer > They invest a lot in track in field compared to other sports because sprinting is their national sport.
And let's not forget a lot of funding comes from sponsorships. I don't think you realise just how much funding Bolt, Blake and co get.
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
true that.hugh wrote:And let's not forget a lot of funding comes from sponsorships. I don't think you realise just how much funding Bolt, Blake and co get.
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
Furthermore, it's not like cos Jamaica is such a poor nation that literally everything they do is from the bottom of the barrel. I can't help but feel there's a tad of ignorance/racism wrapped up in those negative assumptions but its too awkward to unravel.
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
And potentially steroids
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
- Hedley King
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
What about IOC independently testing all olympic medal winners?ehbrums1 wrote:And potentially steroids
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
wut?hugh wrote:I can't help but feel there's a tad of ignorance/racism wrapped up in those negative assumptions but its too awkward to unravel.
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
They would have to do that through each country's system
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
- Hedley King
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
ehbrums1 wrote:They would have to do that through each country's system
that isnt how it works
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
Then explain how athletes are losing their medals only after the Olympics, instead of not being allowed in at all
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
Cos of the size of your country and nature of the education system you lot have.... no other reasons.ehbrums1 wrote:US 104 medals....
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests