What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
User avatar
SCope13
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:57 pm
Location: Nebraska

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Post by SCope13 » Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:01 pm

Might have to read Siddharta so I can have an opinion on it.


Also, Atlas Shrugged is probably the worst book ever.
ultraspatial wrote:doing any sort of drug other than smoking crack is 5 panel.
incnic wrote:true headz tread a fine line between bitterness and euphoria - much like the best rave tunes

User avatar
ehbes
Posts: 19109
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 2:34 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Post by ehbes » Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:03 pm

SCope13 wrote:Might have to read Siddharta so I can have an opinion on it.


Also, Atlas Shrugged is probably the worst book ever.
its terrible
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.

cloquet
Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:59 pm

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Post by cloquet » Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:05 pm

Steppenwolf by Hesse is great

User avatar
Naan_Bread
Posts: 879
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:24 pm

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Post by Naan_Bread » Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:23 pm

I read an earlier Hesse I hadn't heard of called Gertrude last month and thought it was wonderful.

@ehbrums It gets his main ideas across without the mysticism or weirdness of Siddartha or The Glass Bead Game if that put you of those or your opinion I'd based on them.

My favorite three are Kafka, Hesse and Camus. I love Ulysses but haven't really given much time to the rest of Joyce. Never understood why Ulysses has such a stigma: it's much more straightforward than Naked Lunch which a lot of people seem to be posting (I remain convinced that book is a massive in-joke, I tried and failed to read it in sequence but enjoy flicking it open and reading random pages.)

Biggest offender posted so far is On The Road, that shit is the hipster equivalent of The Alchemist.

User avatar
Naan_Bread
Posts: 879
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:24 pm

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Post by Naan_Bread » Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:27 pm

For more character driven, enjoyable reads that I would still consider classics I would reccomend

Earthly Powers - Anthony Burgess
Point Counter Point - Aldous Huxley

User avatar
yoowan
Posts: 768
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:35 pm

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Post by yoowan » Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:39 pm

Image
you're not wrong, you're just an asshole

cloquet
Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:59 pm

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Post by cloquet » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:06 pm

Naan Bread wrote:it's much more straightforward than Naked Lunch which a lot of people seem to be posting (I remain convinced that book is a massive in-joke, I tried and failed to read it in sequence but enjoy flicking it open and reading random pages.)
dipping into burroughs (no pun intended) is probably the best way to read him. obviously the stuff with a linear narrative, like junky & queer, is designed to be read in sequence but naked lunch and the nova trilogy can be read in any order. it's one of his ways of breaking down systems of control.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests