- CPU: Intel Pentium D 2.8GHz
- RAM: 3.00GB
- Windows 7
I know that it's not the best configuration but it used to work just fine.
I think the problem with me is that i have put Izotop Ozone Advanced on everything.. "Kick, Snare, HHClosed x2, HHOpen, Crash.. Atmo.."charles1 wrote:I find that the #1 CPU hog actual isn't too many plug ins - it's too many and too large instrument racks. yes as a lot of people will tell you, having 30 massive patches is not doing you any favors. but I find that a more likely problem is too many instrument racks. Sometimes when testing out different patches, I'll make an instrument rack for the potential patches so that I can easily compare them. If you have more than 4+, you're really pushing it with CPU, but even 2-3 has an effect. I really don't understand why it's such a problem. if you had the patches playing simultaneously on their own separate tracks it would be the exact same thing, but who knows.
if you think this might be the problem, try deleting patches you aren't using (as a rule it's always best to have as little stuff going on in your set as possible) and/or consider separating your instrument rack(s) into multiple tracks side by side. 110% is nothing. I've seen it go passed 700% before! but that's usually when I have other applications like firefox, safari, itunes, word, powerpoint, etc open at the same time which can also cause real CPU problems might I add.
hope this helps.
YeahItsMe wrote:# of samples in you racks(my drum rack used to have 800!!)
Instrument racks are plugins!charles1 wrote:I find that the #1 CPU hog actual isn't too many plug ins - it's too many and too large instrument racks. yes as a lot of people will tell you, having 30 massive patches is not doing you any favors. but I find that a more likely problem is too many instrument racks. Sometimes when testing out different patches, I'll make an instrument rack for the potential patches so that I can easily compare them. If you have more than 4+, you're really pushing it with CPU, but even 2-3 has an effect. I really don't understand why it's such a problem. if you had the patches playing simultaneously on their own separate tracks it would be the exact same thing, but who knows.
if you think this might be the problem, try deleting patches you aren't using (as a rule it's always best to have as little stuff going on in your set as possible) and/or consider separating your instrument rack(s) into multiple tracks side by side. 110% is nothing. I've seen it go passed 700% before! but that's usually when I have other applications like firefox, safari, itunes, word, powerpoint, etc open at the same time which can also cause real CPU problems might I add.
hope this helps.
Then I guess I meant external plugins. In Ableton's library, there is a "category" called plugins. Instrument rack is not in the plugins category - it's in the "Instruments" category.Simulant wrote:Instrument racks are plugins!
And what exactly do you think a rack is? It holds synths and fx! From what I've seen, you're the biggest misinformer here mate.charles1 wrote:Then I guess I meant external plugins. In Ableton's library, there is a "category" called plugins. Instrument rack is not in the plugins category - it's in the "Instruments" category.Simulant wrote:Instrument racks are plugins!
32bit on 64bit windows.OfficialDAPT wrote:ableton 8 or 9? If 9, 32 bit or 64?
Legitbibbyj wrote:Is any of the software cracked, or is it all legit ?
Nope, the problem wasn't with the ableton. It was me using too much plugins that are CPU hungry.wub wrote:Have you contacted Ableton tech support?
Don't know which DAW are u using but for FL Studio it's called "Smart plugin disable" I think...Brothulhu wrote:II don't use ableton but when I produce in my shitty laptop I put massive on "eco mode" then put it back to ultra before rendering
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests