How many releases a year does it take to stay relevant?

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread

How many releases per year are enough?

one single (maybe a few remixes etc.) (1-4 tunes)
3
5%
1 EP / a few singles/remixes (~4-6 tunes)
15
25%
2-3 EPs / one LP (~12-18 tunes)
5
8%
1 LP + a few singles/remixes (~ 20+ tunes)
0
No votes
no particular number: quality > quantity
37
61%
none, if their past releases are still doing it for me
1
2%
I have the attention span of a squirrel so a release every month would be nice
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 61

jaydot
Posts: 5860
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:34 am
Location: Your place or hers?

Re: How many releases a year does it take to stay relevant?

Post by jaydot » Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:11 pm

Or you could do a Loefah and not release anything in time then release something that sounds like it was made in 2005.
Soundcloud

Soundcloud

tweet @jaydotdubstep

chekov
Posts: 5384
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:34 pm
Location: erm

Re: How many releases a year does it take to stay relevant?

Post by chekov » Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:14 pm

jaydot wrote:Or you could do a Loefah and not release anything in time then release something that sounds like it was made in 2005.
:4:

please can more people release tunes that sound like this
alex bk-bk wrote:some of you lot chat bare shit

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: How many releases a year does it take to stay relevant?

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:22 pm

I'd go with 1 quality ep or single a year, Quality defo over quantity. Relevant just equals hypemeter these days imo.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

User avatar
Figment
Posts: 1138
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:08 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: How many releases a year does it take to stay relevant?

Post by Figment » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:31 pm

Quality > Quantity, depends on the producer though.

IE, Kromestar probably has the most releases/tunes released from this scene/genre (i don't actually have this confirmed, but i'm pretty confident he does infact) and he does actually release quite regularly through his multiple outputs. and IMO he has High Quality & Quantity (maybe bias'd because he is my favourite producer)

Or you could look at Om Unit and see he has a fair few releases under his belt, but doesn't release overly frequently (1 EP and a few/lot of remixes) in the past 12 months, but again, all top notch releases and i am happy to wait months for a new Om Unit release because let's be completely honest i'm still battering his kramphaft remix like i just heard it yesterday haha.

a more dubstep sample would be icicle.. very high quality, really quite low quantity (as far as dubstep goes) and i'm happy with what i've got.

without seeming to be a suck up or anything like that, i've always pictured cosmic bridge as a label that does this very very well, all the releases are excellent, and have excellent replay value, it's been a while since the last one came out (although the last 3 came in rather quick succession) and i am looking forward to see what releases are coming next (after the kromestar), but the catalogue available ATM is still very much doing it for me.

these were really the best examples for me, and i'm not going to go into "bad" examples because i can't really word it in a way it doesn't look bad, but there are labels that need to slow down, producers that need to slow down.
incnic wrote:eat bass u r a wanker m8 lol
fuk off with ur shite prolems cos im trying to classofy dungeon vs classic dubstep ffs
Giving away some remixes:
Soundcloud

User avatar
Hedley King
Posts: 281
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:56 pm
Contact:

Re: How many releases a year does it take to stay relevant?

Post by Hedley King » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:44 pm

some artists can make a long career from a couple of really good releases that become classics.....some stay relevant and popular with no releases just for being a big dj/label owner

Geey
Posts: 789
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:04 am

Re: How many releases a year does it take to stay relevant?

Post by Geey » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:52 pm

all about quality over quantity for me.
take luke envoy for example.. never released many tracks but every one is pretty much a classic now.

all about having your own quality control, if your 100% happy with what you have done, then send it out to the labels or give it your label etc

i'd personally rather have released 3 classics than release 100 avergae run of the mill tracks

plus those 3 tracks would probably get you more gigs than the 100 track guy.

kromestar has released soo many records but i bet he doesnt get booked as much as someone like commodo who has only released a hand full

jaydot
Posts: 5860
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:34 am
Location: Your place or hers?

Re: How many releases a year does it take to stay relevant?

Post by jaydot » Mon Jul 08, 2013 7:07 pm

BlueyTeamTom wrote:Quality > Quantity, depends on the producer though.

IE, Kromestar probably has the most releases/tunes released from this scene/genre (i don't actually have this confirmed, but i'm pretty confident he does infact) and he does actually release quite regularly through his multiple outputs. and IMO he has High Quality & Quantity (maybe bias'd because he is my favourite producer)

Or you could look at Om Unit and see he has a fair few releases under his belt, but doesn't release overly frequently (1 EP and a few/lot of remixes) in the past 12 months, but again, all top notch releases and i am happy to wait months for a new Om Unit release because let's be completely honest i'm still battering his kramphaft remix like i just heard it yesterday haha.

a more dubstep sample would be icicle.. very high quality, really quite low quantity (as far as dubstep goes) and i'm happy with what i've got.

without seeming to be a suck up or anything like that, i've always pictured cosmic bridge as a label that does this very very well, all the releases are excellent, and have excellent replay value, it's been a while since the last one came out (although the last 3 came in rather quick succession) and i am looking forward to see what releases are coming next (after the kromestar), but the catalogue available ATM is still very much doing it for me.

these were really the best examples for me, and i'm not going to go into "bad" examples because i can't really word it in a way it doesn't look bad, but there are labels that need to slow down, producers that need to slow down.
I'd argue that Icicle was pretty prolific but agree with most of what other stuff you said.
Soundcloud

Soundcloud

tweet @jaydotdubstep

herbs
Posts: 738
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: How many releases a year does it take to stay relevant?

Post by herbs » Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:34 pm

It obviously varies for different people, but I'd personally say quality over quantity all the time. Look at someone like Actress for example...he doesn't pummel the shelves with releases, but has a consistently high quality output that people respect.

If you like him, you'll always search out and cop his work.

The problem with 'dance' music is that people need to fill their sets...and producers feel they need to be the ones to consistently do that....which makes it more difficult to keep a succinct(?) and high quality discography.

Riddles
Posts: 4819
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:44 am
Location: Brighton

Re: How many releases a year does it take to stay relevant?

Post by Riddles » Mon Jul 08, 2013 10:00 pm

It depends on how recognized you are already I think.
Pinch isn't constantly releasing stuff, about 2 or so a year, but I will guaranteed listen and probably cop the tunes he does release.
Goth trad is another. about 1 release a year over the last 3-4 years, but i will always listen to them and they're all great.

but these guys are already really well respected in the dubstep scene, i think it really depends on how well you are already doing to be honest. A newer producer needs
to release a lot more music than one that has been doing it a long time.
Image
soronery wrote:Too easy to sit behind a keyboard with a playlist of dubstep tunes on, arguing about the defintion of a word in relation to a sound.
All that melts away when the lights are down and the bass is up.

test_recordings
Posts: 5079
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:36 pm
Location: LEEDS

Re: How many releases a year does it take to stay relevant?

Post by test_recordings » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:48 am

I suppose this is all goijg to be subjective with no objective criteria to check against
Getzatrhythm

skimpi
Posts: 4241
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:25 am

Re: How many releases a year does it take to stay relevant?

Post by skimpi » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:57 am

Yeah like everyone else says, quality over quantititytytytiy, but obviously I am always open to and anticipating new releases from my faves

I spose it does come down to dubs as well though, as hearing a new dub from someone can get you excited or keep you interested in them, but it may take ages or even not come out, but you still are hearing new things and can see where they are at. If you hear nothing from them though, you may start to forget about them until you come across there older stuff again.
TopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming
OiOiii #BELTER

dooshbhag
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 1:14 am
Location: Queens

Re: How many releases a year does it take to stay relevant?

Post by dooshbhag » Tue Jul 09, 2013 5:24 am

Depends on the quality of your surrounding gimmicks.

Burial has a highly irregular release rate/schedule, but he's still on top. Many brostep labels release shit every other week and struggle to keep their beatport licences...

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests