Soz mat8 jus tryin to follow what the discussions about, didn't mean to start an interweb hate wargarethom wrote:Swear down people act like there's an official naming ceremony or something.
Somebody started a thread, explained the sort of sound he was on about, everyone in that thread knew what the thread was about then.
Folk more interested in slagging arbitrarily assigned names than discussing the tunes...
ZOMBY
Re: ZOMBY
-
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:43 am
Re: ZOMBY
pshh, that is is perhaps the cheapest cop-out i've ever read on here tbh.garethom wrote:I think its more a certain group of people that would rather just try and antagonise everyone else in the thread rather than join in the discussion about the tunes, nothing to do with the tunes themselves.
like i've said before, if the beats were banging, ppl would appreci8.
the majority aren't doe therefore u get 3 pages of drivel and ridiculous statements such as
bennyfroobs wrote:130 > 90% of dubstep produced in the last 6 years (

Re: ZOMBY
urgh pressed enter too fast brb with edit
"If your chest ain't rattlin it ain't happenin'" - DJ Pinch
"Move pples bodies and stimulate their minds"
we just ride the wave
Life sucks; Get used² it.
big up your mum
"Move pples bodies and stimulate their minds"
we just ride the wave
Life sucks; Get used² it.
big up your mum
- pete_bubonic
- Posts: 4000
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:06 pm
- Location: Bristol
- Contact:
Re: ZOMBY
Not sure I got the argument here (can't be arsed to read the whole thing), are you saying that the term 130 is from this forum and no one really knows it elsewhere? Because that would obviously be wrong. Got to any purported 'bass music' night (basically deep house nights with novelty grime tunes thrown in so the promoters can claim they were on it since day) and people are talking about that 130 as a genre name. Inanely boring, but reflects the creative period of uk dance music well.
I make music as Forsaken, you can DL all my unreleased (and a couple released) bits here.
-
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:43 am
Re: ZOMBY
pete bubonic wrote:Not sure I got the argument here (can't be arsed to read the whole thing), are you saying that the term 130 is from this forum and no one really knows it elsewhere? Because that would obviously be wrong. Got to any purported 'bass music' night (basically deep house nights with novelty grime tunes thrown in so the promoters can claim they were on it since day) and people are talking about that 130 as a genre name.
this is what you're on about.back_beat wrote:wtf is 130, thought thats what everyone was calling house like 9 months ago fuckin labels
(unless guize are now gonna say that deep house dj's are spinning the names mentioned on the past couple of pages.

nah brah cozpete bubonic wrote:Inanely boring, but reflects the creative period of uk dance music well.
bennyfroobs wrote:130 > 90% of dubstep produced in the last 6 years (
Re: ZOMBY
TopManLurka wrote:like i've said before, if the beats were banging, ppl would appreci8.
the majority aren't doe therefore u get 3 pages of drivel and ridiculous statements such as

Check this thread mate, plenty of people in there seem to appreci8. People doing their best to get around the bait criticisms of an unofficial name plenty of people were fine with to share some tunes they're feeling. Just has to be someone in any thread around the emerging sound that is more interested in slagging a quick-fitted name rather than discussing the tune.
From what I've heard of Dusk & Blackdown's night, plenty of people appreci8d, so hopefully that can go on and spread the sound a little more. Wen, Beneath, etc. all seem to have plenty of appreci8ion and there's plenty of "smaller" names that are beginning to get a little more heard and getting more label attention.
The majority on here can at least appreci8 some of the stuff coming out of the Dusk & Blackdown lot. Personally, I think Epoch has made the most, if not the only, interesting dubstep-y type stuff for at least a couple of years now.
You won't find anybody else on here that tries to antagonise people that are just trying to discuss music as much as you. Ever notice how drivel and ridiculous statements seem to follow YOU around a lot? Perhaps you shouldn't instigate it with your endless drivel. We get it man, you're cooler than the rest of us, you can see things for what they really are, you've freed the realness that the rest of DSF is blind to...

-
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:43 am
Re: ZOMBY
^u tried hard
http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 0#p3428864
scroll down you absolute melt to see if i was anywhere near this topic of convo.
that's how uno that paragraphed post of yours is just held up online frustration
hashtag pain
http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 0#p3428864
scroll down you absolute melt to see if i was anywhere near this topic of convo.
that's how uno that paragraphed post of yours is just held up online frustration

hashtag pain
Re: ZOMBY
Where did I say you were involved, you utter fucking bore?
We're talking about people derailing valid MUSICAL conversation by moaning about names, and you said that people would talk about the tunes if they were any good. I gave you the perfect example of people trying to chat about the music with a minority trying to derail shit.
Oh shit, I used paragraphs, what a pussy.
Most of time man, I'm not even sure why you want to post here.
We're talking about people derailing valid MUSICAL conversation by moaning about names, and you said that people would talk about the tunes if they were any good. I gave you the perfect example of people trying to chat about the music with a minority trying to derail shit.
Oh shit, I used paragraphs, what a pussy.

Most of time man, I'm not even sure why you want to post here.
-
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:43 am
Re: ZOMBY
stop backtracking m7. you're definition of a musical conversation sounds about as lively as speaking to the deaf / dead.
it's now someone disliking something = someone derailing a thread. them ones where you misread a thread but u hold so much online resentment that you couldn't keep it in lululu. certified melt.
also dubstepforum, where if you don't rate something x likes, you're now antagonistic.
it's now someone disliking something = someone derailing a thread. them ones where you misread a thread but u hold so much online resentment that you couldn't keep it in lululu. certified melt.
also dubstepforum, where if you don't rate something x likes, you're now antagonistic.
smh, 'llow it. even doe i troll sometimes, i'll happily hold a perma-ban if it turns out i contribute less to general discussion than you or the rest of the sycophants on here.garethom wrote:Most of time man, I'm not even sure why you want to post here.
Re: ZOMBY
Take back what I said about Breen actually, didn't mean to leave his name in there. I like hooded up. But a lot of these producers make perfectly "OK" music but are basically never gonna be as good as the few people who do it really well (beneath, visionist etc.) they just pale by comparison. Dusk + Blackdown played a tune on Rinse the other week that was just straight ripping off beneath, not even trying to hide it. and i'm sorry but wtf is it with rabit? I don't get it. did you hear that awful remix of that dj q tune? seems like there's a competition in this "style" where you just try to make an "eski" beat as rhythmically stupid as possible.dididub wrote:steady.jsml wrote:I've never heard anything from breen, epoch, rabit or bloom that's really impressed me.
hooded up b2b hollow b2b ...for life b2b bridge
b2b steppenwolf/that egptian stuff
b2b double dragon ep b2b plymouth/burnerz
b2b quartz b2b maze temple ep
did you hear the Luke Benjamin showcase too? Now that's mediocre. couldn't believe dusk + blackdown were even going there. Listen to that and then the '38 EP' and you'll see what I mean, standards are slipping. (generally, not specific to keysound or anything else).
Re: ZOMBY
Back in my day everything was betterjsml wrote:Take back what I said about Breen actually, didn't mean to leave his name in there. I like hooded up. But a lot of these producers make perfectly "OK" music but are basically never gonna be as good as the few people who do it really well (beneath, visionist etc.) they just pale by comparison. Dusk + Blackdown played a tune on Rinse the other week that was just straight ripping off beneath, not even trying to hide it. and i'm sorry but wtf is it with rabit? I don't get it. did you hear that awful remix of that dj q tune? seems like there's a competition in this "style" where you just try to make an "eski" beat as rhythmically stupid as possible.dididub wrote:steady.jsml wrote:I've never heard anything from breen, epoch, rabit or bloom that's really impressed me.
hooded up b2b hollow b2b ...for life b2b bridge
b2b steppenwolf/that egptian stuff
b2b double dragon ep b2b plymouth/burnerz
b2b quartz b2b maze temple ep
did you hear the Luke Benjamin showcase too? Now that's mediocre. couldn't believe dusk + blackdown were even going there. Listen to that and then the '38 EP' and you'll see what I mean, standards are slipping. (generally, not specific to keysound or anything else).

- bennyfroobs
- Posts: 4532
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:52 am
- Location: the rainy north
Re: ZOMBY
jeb ends m8TopManLurka wrote:which is?mIrReN wrote:sorry, but it says everything about the ppl discussing itTopManLurka wrote:garethom wrote:Folk more interested in slagging arbitrarily assigned names than discussing the tunes...and that says everything about the level of beats then mate. everything.
ppl slagging the "name" and generally acting like bitchy little girls; id say that says more about the ppl than it could possibyl say about anythin else. its a boring cyclical discussion that hs occured before has no resolve abd people would who werent massive dribblers wou ldnt propagate it. just people being nob s for the sake of it. poathetic and childish theres nthing else to say rly
id just rather talk bout somethign else, it doesnt make me mad or anything lol its the internet. but if ur having lots of lovely fun then ig uess its okay

mmmm delicious crayons
inb4 '6 years'


TopManLurka wrote:FTR, requirements for being a 'head':
-you have to be youngsta
-you must have been in that infamous room of ten people.
-a DMZ release is preferable but not necessary.
-please note that being youngsta is mandatory.
- bennyfroobs
- Posts: 4532
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:52 am
- Location: the rainy north
Re: ZOMBY
hahahha fair onejsml wrote:there's a competition in this "style" where you just try to make an "eski" beat as rhythmically stupid as possible.
i enjoy that though

TopManLurka wrote:FTR, requirements for being a 'head':
-you have to be youngsta
-you must have been in that infamous room of ten people.
-a DMZ release is preferable but not necessary.
-please note that being youngsta is mandatory.
-
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:43 am
Re: ZOMBY
lol @ u calling anyone a bitchy little girl. two guys simply said '130 is so dull' and 'dungeon is even better' and you piped in with the below as if to say their opinion held no weight.bennyfroobs wrote:jeb ends m8
ppl slagging the "name" and generally acting like bitchy little girls; id say that says more about the ppl than it could possibyl say about anythin else. its a boring cyclical discussion that hs occured before has no resolve abd people would who werent massive dribblers wou ldnt propagate it. just people being nob s for the sake of it. poathetic and childish theres nthing else to say rly
u post like a bitch.bennyfroobs wrote:u chomps cant be serious
130 > 90% of dubstep produced in the last 6 years (excluding brostep, cos obv that doesnt count). maybs thats cos ever1 produces dungeon
its vastly more interesting and lively than dungeon
- bennyfroobs
- Posts: 4532
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:52 am
- Location: the rainy north
Re: ZOMBY
nomnomnomnomnom crayons

TopManLurka wrote:FTR, requirements for being a 'head':
-you have to be youngsta
-you must have been in that infamous room of ten people.
-a DMZ release is preferable but not necessary.
-please note that being youngsta is mandatory.
Re: ZOMBY
Clearly Dusk + Blackdown need to have a meeting and invite all of the artists they have been pushing and decide on a name. Or they could just leave it and let the music grow naturally in what ever direction it wishes to grow.
Etches828 wrote:assuming that 130 is a tempo not a sound, which is the point, think it's pretty good when stuff is just described by tempo opposed to some made up name
- pete_bubonic
- Posts: 4000
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:06 pm
- Location: Bristol
- Contact:
Re: ZOMBY
Don't be such a sideman, anyone can voice their dislike of a tune, but some people are fucking determined to wind people up about it, they know they can get a rise because the topic deals with peoples passions. They're trolls and you know it.TopManLurka wrote:
also dubstepforum, where if you don't rate something x likes, you're now antagonistic.
Don't be that guy. Please.
I make music as Forsaken, you can DL all my unreleased (and a couple released) bits here.
Re: ZOMBY
This was the whole idea. It just happens to be based around 130 bpm, and Blackdown happened to use the phrase "dark 130" in a blogpost (talking about wen, beneaths etc tunes) and a bunch of people jumped on it like it was gospel lol.Marcus wrote:\Or they could just leave it and let the music grow naturally in what ever direction it wishes to grow.
It doesn't have a name for a reason. llow it.
The point of this whole thing is to showcase new talent and to encourage people that listen to the radio show to start writing music.(Blackdown has said this himself a bunch of times)
You don't have to like it.
Please buy the tunes and go to the nights if you are feeling it.
Etches828 wrote:is "130" a genre now, i heard it was a bpm

BACK ON TOPIC
WUT
jrkhnds wrote:- dubstepforum, 2014.and I've never really rated dubstep..
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests