Raw talent vs potential etc

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
Icetickle
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:27 am

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by Icetickle » Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:16 pm

wub wrote:Isn't creativity in itself a talent though?
Everyone can be creative in some way.
Depth is a delusion, the deeper you look the less you see.

titchbit
Posts: 3536
Joined: Sat May 11, 2013 8:16 pm
Location: levitating on bass weight

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by titchbit » Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:16 pm

wub wrote:Isn't creativity in itself a talent though?
yes exactly it is.

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by wub » Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:18 pm

dubunked wrote:
wub wrote:Isn't creativity in itself a talent though?
yes exactly it is.
Icetickle wrote:
wub wrote:Isn't creativity in itself a talent though?
Everyone can be creative in some way.
So if talent is creativity and everyone can be creative in some way, that means everyone is talented to an extent, no?

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by Genevieve » Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:19 pm

Mr 50 wrote:My girlfriend recently read a book called 'bounce' and the whole thing was study into people with perceived 'talent'. Long story short, the book sets out that this is utter bullshit and it's all about practice - and efficient / effective methods of practice.
I doubt it. It may not be specific talents. Like being a talented 'producer' seems pretty overly specific, but I think some people have a certain 'wiring' that aides them in a set of tasks (150 thousand years ago, that task could be different, may not even be strictly creative, but it was expressed like that in that time's circumstances). Like Einstein's brain was physically abnormal, I think it lacked a certain tissue. That adaption enabled him to visualize complex experiences, coupled with his intelligence and knowledge, it gave him the ability to come up with his ideas. Isn't that a talent? There was also this guy who could hold on to a motorcycle driving away at full speed and keep it in place for 15 seconds. He can activate more muscle fibers at once than other people can, which enables him to perform some amazing feats of strength. And it's a physical abnormality much like Einstein's brain.

And there may be such a thing as 'talent' that appears natural, but is passively nurtured. Like I wouldn't call myself a talented producer, but I would say I have a talent for drum programming. No matter what I do, or what style I try to do, I can just go ahead and program it without much real effort and it can get pretty complicated. And I think it's because in all my time as a music fan, I always really liked drums that were all over the place. Complex breaks in old hip-hop when I was 12, free-jazz and technical metal when I was 15, etc. So when I started producing, it just came out that way.
wub wrote:Isn't creativity in itself a talent though?
Or logic.
Image

namsayin

:'0

titchbit
Posts: 3536
Joined: Sat May 11, 2013 8:16 pm
Location: levitating on bass weight

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by titchbit » Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:45 pm

wub wrote:So if talent is creativity and everyone can be creative in some way, that means everyone is talented to an extent, no?
well yeah. and "to an extent" can mean zero, too. in other words, people that have no creativity have no creative talent. in theory, at least, because in reality everyone probably has some sort of creativity. but this is immeasurable as far as I know. but there are other forms of talent that are important to music production IMO such as technical skills. you gotta be able to understand the complexities of computers.

User avatar
Icetickle
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:27 am

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by Icetickle » Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:13 pm

dubunked wrote:
wub wrote:So if talent is creativity and everyone can be creative in some way, that means everyone is talented to an extent, no?
well yeah. and "to an extent" can mean zero, too. in other words, people that have no creativity have no creative talent. in theory, at least, because in reality everyone probably has some sort of creativity. but this is immeasurable as far as I know. but there are other forms of talent that are important to music production IMO such as technical skills. you gotta be able to understand the complexities of computers.
Oh yeah, you need to be good with information technology (IT).
Depth is a delusion, the deeper you look the less you see.

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by wub » Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:17 pm

Not really, some guys on here rock all hardware setups w/out a computer of any sort.

titchbit
Posts: 3536
Joined: Sat May 11, 2013 8:16 pm
Location: levitating on bass weight

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by titchbit » Mon Jul 29, 2013 4:04 pm

well i mean you gotta understand some technical stuff (eg routing, etc)

User avatar
Icetickle
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:27 am

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by Icetickle » Mon Jul 29, 2013 4:33 pm

wub wrote:Not really, some guys on here rock all hardware setups w/out a computer of any sort.
You don't need a PC to be good with IT.
Depth is a delusion, the deeper you look the less you see.

L_O_O_K
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 3:04 am

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by L_O_O_K » Mon Jul 29, 2013 4:39 pm

This is how i see it: You need two things to become successful as a music maker. 1: Hard Work, and 2: creativity.

Hard Work: Anyone can achieve hard work, this is how you get good at producing music. You learn what sounds good, you learn what you need in a song to make it sound good and how to use the tools (DAWs scales rhythm etc. etc.). Anyone can learn this, it takes years of practice to become a good engineer so start failing and learning now. and u will never get anywhere if u dont fail so start failing and start embracing and learning from it.

Creativity: This is a potent ingredient in making good music. We all hve different lives and we all have different experiences and memories. Creativity is channeling yourself into whatever you are doing. No one is the same. this is why some artists have great unique music an some have shitty generic music aka brostep / trap etc. You need to find whatever you love in life, even if its the past or memories and channel it into your music. if you do it and with enough practice (refer to hard work) y ou will make something that sounds unlike anyone else.

above all have fun and if u dont enjoy music stop making it and take a break. if ur not having fun ur not being creative.

Add9
Posts: 310
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 5:39 am

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by Add9 » Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:01 pm

L O O K wrote:this is why some artists have great unique music an some have shitty generic music aka brostep / trap etc.
not all brostep and trap has to be shitty and generic
WolfCryOfficial wrote:Have fun on your musical campaign to hell.

User avatar
SunkLo
Posts: 3428
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:54 am
Location: Canadaland

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by SunkLo » Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:28 pm

Is hard work a talent? Some people seem to be better at it than others.
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.

titchbit
Posts: 3536
Joined: Sat May 11, 2013 8:16 pm
Location: levitating on bass weight

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by titchbit » Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:39 pm

SunkLo wrote:Is hard work a talent? Some people seem to be better at it than others.
very, very true. good point.

peaka
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:11 pm

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by peaka » Mon Jul 29, 2013 7:38 pm

Knowledge or the continual process of learning will ALWAYS trump neglected talent

Simply put, 20/80 rule. 20% of how much you know 80% of how much you're willing to work/learn to get what you want.

Yes, talent is a factor but not the main ingredient to success. Many talented people do not obtain success and TONS of people achieve success even though they were not born with "natural" talent. Just look outside of music, athletes, doctors, astronauts, etc.

Again, yes talent, genetic disposition, environment growing up, etc all play a factor to who we are today, but I'm a firm believer that you get out what you put in. Talent without practice means absolutely nothing and will get you nowhere.

Prodigies are born, but it's a very small bracket and let's be real, if any of us were one, we wouldn't be here discussing ways to perfect our sound, we'd be the ones giving the advice.

Remember, it's easy to say that you'll give anything for music but consider this. There are people going for formal schooling for audio engineering, spending $17,000 a semester (not year, semester), 70 hour/week not knowing if they'll get a job at the end of their 2/3 year term. If they even graduate that is...

That means living at home with your parents, eating ramen, no friends, no life, no nothing during the prime social years of your life. I know some of you will say "PFFFT, I'd do that now anyways and would be easy". Trust me when I say the dropout rate is 70-80% and most realize that it's not worth the sacrifice...

If you don't have prolific parents that'll hook you up, hard work is your best route to success. Personally, I find people with talent think they'll eventually make it somehow without putting in the work. They eventually stop trying, get complacent and complain to others about how they didn't "make it".

Again, talent without practice means absolutely nothing and will get you nowhere.

User avatar
Aufnahmewindwuschel
Posts: 2143
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by Aufnahmewindwuschel » Mon Jul 29, 2013 8:42 pm

talent is like the matrix trilogy at the end you get shittier and on part of you becomes a woman
jedi govna, picka ти materina
glasses?
Soundcloud

User avatar
Icetickle
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:27 am

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by Icetickle » Mon Jul 29, 2013 8:45 pm

BudSpencertron wrote:talent is like the matrix trilogy at the end you get shittier and on part of you becomes a woman
You are one sick motherfucker...
Depth is a delusion, the deeper you look the less you see.

User avatar
Aufnahmewindwuschel
Posts: 2143
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by Aufnahmewindwuschel » Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:00 pm

:corndance:
same with artists who make cool music but than say that they like scrubs or big bang theory :u:
or kryptic minds "skating"
jedi govna, picka ти materina
glasses?
Soundcloud

User avatar
3za
Posts: 4605
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:24 pm

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by 3za » Mon Jul 29, 2013 11:51 pm

7 of my joints, are double jointed, and I have 3 testicles. That is what natural talent looks like bitches. You can't 10,000 hours that!!!!
2 keyboards 1 computer
Sure_Fire wrote:By the way does anyone have the stems to make it bun dem? Missed the beatport comp and would very much like the ego booster of saying I remixed Skrillex.

User avatar
SunkLo
Posts: 3428
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:54 am
Location: Canadaland

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by SunkLo » Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:17 am

3za wrote:7 of my joints, are double jointed, and I have 3 testicles. That is what natural talent looks like bitches. You can't 10,000 hours that!!!!
10000 hours in front of a microwave.
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.

User avatar
3za
Posts: 4605
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:24 pm

Re: Raw talent vs potential etc

Post by 3za » Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:27 am

SunkLo wrote:
3za wrote:7 of my joints, are double jointed, and I have 3 testicles. That is what natural talent looks like bitches. You can't 10,000 hours that!!!!
10000 hours in front of a microwave.
:cornlol:
2 keyboards 1 computer
Sure_Fire wrote:By the way does anyone have the stems to make it bun dem? Missed the beatport comp and would very much like the ego booster of saying I remixed Skrillex.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests