Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- Devilsindub
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:21 am
- Location: L.A, Ca, U.S.A
Fl studio, why the bad rap?
My name is Comprodox and I produce dubstep under the name d.i.d with a really good friend of mine. I'm slightly curious as to why it seems that most dubstep producers tend to associate fl studio users with amateur artists? Can anyone please shed some light on this subject for me? It would be highly appreciated.
-thanks
-thanks
-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
It's not "most dubstep producers" who hate on FL. Most dubstep producers have used, or still use FL.
FL's bad rep is a left-over from when it genuinely wasn't a proper DAW, back in versions 1 to 5 ish. It has gradually evolved in to being a proper DAW.
I'd guess at least 35%, if not 50% of early dubstep was made in FL. Old versions of Reason are probably responsible for a slightly smaller but still significant percentage.
Skream, Benga, Kromestar, Heny G, Lost, Silkie, Cessman, JazzyJazzy/J.Tijn, etc etc etc. Bare brostep producers. Many people rock it.
If you built the exact same track in FL and Reaper (for instance) using only VST and VSTi plugins (no program-specific stock/in-built processing) then bounce both tunes at the exact same level, the waveforms will be identical.
In this day and age, the only differences between DAWs are their workflow and stock/built-in plugins and routing, e.g the mixer. This is what will actually impact you; not sound quality (even if it was an issue - which it's not)
People who diss FL probably do so because they don't like it's layout or workflow. This is the only valid reason for dissing any DAW.
edit: this thread should be in the 'production' section btw
fuck reason's sequencer
FL's bad rep is a left-over from when it genuinely wasn't a proper DAW, back in versions 1 to 5 ish. It has gradually evolved in to being a proper DAW.
I'd guess at least 35%, if not 50% of early dubstep was made in FL. Old versions of Reason are probably responsible for a slightly smaller but still significant percentage.
Skream, Benga, Kromestar, Heny G, Lost, Silkie, Cessman, JazzyJazzy/J.Tijn, etc etc etc. Bare brostep producers. Many people rock it.
If you built the exact same track in FL and Reaper (for instance) using only VST and VSTi plugins (no program-specific stock/in-built processing) then bounce both tunes at the exact same level, the waveforms will be identical.
In this day and age, the only differences between DAWs are their workflow and stock/built-in plugins and routing, e.g the mixer. This is what will actually impact you; not sound quality (even if it was an issue - which it's not)
People who diss FL probably do so because they don't like it's layout or workflow. This is the only valid reason for dissing any DAW.
edit: this thread should be in the 'production' section btw
fuck reason's sequencer
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
£10 Bag wrote:FL's bad rep is a left-over from when it genuinely wasn't a proper DAW, back in versions 1 to 5 ish.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Mostly true although randomizing inside of the vsts (phase probably) and slight differences in interpolation/dithering algorithms will lead to different waveforms from each DAW. Just pointing out completely useless facts.£10 Bag wrote: If you built the exact same track in FL and Reaper (for instance) using only VST and VSTi plugins (no program-specific stock/in-built processing) then bounce both tunes at the exact same level, the waveforms will be identical.
Also the panning laws might be different.
- Electric_Head
- Posts: 16958
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
- Location: South of Africa
- Contact:
-
didi
- Posts: 3788
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:52 pm
- Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_dvT8dttyQ
- Contact:
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
that's a gd pointElectric_Head wrote:It's probably because most ppl are assumed to be cracking it.
it's not really the daw it's the perceived average user that gives fl the "bad rap"
-
test_recordings
- Posts: 5079
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:36 pm
- Location: LEEDS
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
I personally just don't like it, but it is still perfectly functional.
Getzatrhythm
- Devilsindub
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:21 am
- Location: L.A, Ca, U.S.A
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
All these replies make sense. Thanks for clearing that up. Fl studio is a pretty reliable DAW for me, so that was a nagging question in my mind.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
I personally dont like having to map things to the mixer.
On top of that, i dont know how to duplicate a synth and a mixer channel at the same time. AFAIK you have to save the mixer channel then load it on the next one. Whereas in logic you only have to press "command + D"
So simple workflow things like that are the reason im not into FL.
On top of that, i dont know how to duplicate a synth and a mixer channel at the same time. AFAIK you have to save the mixer channel then load it on the next one. Whereas in logic you only have to press "command + D"
So simple workflow things like that are the reason im not into FL.
ruckus49 wrote:in this post i defend hummus and celery sticks, as a healthy after school snack
- Devilsindub
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:21 am
- Location: L.A, Ca, U.S.A
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
That makes sense mut3. I started with fl many many years ago so I'm probably just used to doing the extra work.
- Devilsindub
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:21 am
- Location: L.A, Ca, U.S.A
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Oh and thanks for the heads up £10 Bag! I'm new to the forum so I'm not sure where to properly post stuff yet.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
FL being called "Fruity Loops" seems to piss people off too, its kinda silly.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
i like fruity loops. nothing wrong with being fruity you prudes
Hexagon Album Coming 23rd January 2016
Soundcloud
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Hexagon-D ... 5406280511
https://soundcloud.com/hexagon-dubs
Soundcloud
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Hexagon-D ... 5406280511
https://soundcloud.com/hexagon-dubs
-
TopManLurka
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:43 am
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
read an interview with nero saying they still use fl.
/
/
- Devilsindub
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:21 am
- Location: L.A, Ca, U.S.A
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
You guys can check our tracks at [bandcamp][/bandcamp]/devilsindub. Not sure how to upload the tracks directly to the forum yet. Can anyone help with that?
-Comprodox
-Comprodox
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
If it's good enough for Wen and Commodo it's good enough for me!
Hasn't been called Fruity Loops for years.ParasiTTe wrote:FL being called "Fruity Loops" seems to piss people off too, its kinda silly.
jrkhnds wrote:- dubstepforum, 2014.and I've never really rated dubstep..
- Electric_Head
- Posts: 16958
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
- Location: South of Africa
- Contact:
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
You created this thread just to big up your tunes?Devilsindub wrote:You guys can check our tracks at. Not sure how to upload the tracks directly to the forum yet. Can anyone help with that?
-Comprodox



Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Haha, is that like Kitchen Fresh Chicken then?epochalypso wrote:If it's good enough for Wen and Commodo it's good enough for me!
Hasn't been called Fruity Loops for years.ParasiTTe wrote:FL being called "Fruity Loops" seems to piss people off too, its kinda silly.
RKM wrote: when bae hands u the aux mixtape and your squad blunted 9/11 aye lmao
- Devilsindub
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:21 am
- Location: L.A, Ca, U.S.A
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
I'm pretty much new so I don't even know what the hell a big up is. I wanted to show a valid example of what fl is capable of and what I was able to create with it. Not trying to spam anyone.
- Electric_Head
- Posts: 16958
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
- Location: South of Africa
- Contact:
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Just realize that this is a production forum.
What give you the idea none of us know what FL can do.
Epoch listed Wen and Commodo above.
What give you the idea none of us know what FL can do.
Epoch listed Wen and Commodo above.



Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests