Fl studio, why the bad rap?

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
Devilsindub
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:21 am
Location: L.A, Ca, U.S.A

Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by Devilsindub » Mon Aug 26, 2013 5:29 am

My name is Comprodox and I produce dubstep under the name d.i.d with a really good friend of mine. I'm slightly curious as to why it seems that most dubstep producers tend to associate fl studio users with amateur artists? Can anyone please shed some light on this subject for me? It would be highly appreciated.

-thanks
Divisionary/creAtures

Soundcloud
Soundcloud

__________
Posts: 6338
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by __________ » Mon Aug 26, 2013 6:49 am

It's not "most dubstep producers" who hate on FL. Most dubstep producers have used, or still use FL.

FL's bad rep is a left-over from when it genuinely wasn't a proper DAW, back in versions 1 to 5 ish. It has gradually evolved in to being a proper DAW.

I'd guess at least 35%, if not 50% of early dubstep was made in FL. Old versions of Reason are probably responsible for a slightly smaller but still significant percentage.

Skream, Benga, Kromestar, Heny G, Lost, Silkie, Cessman, JazzyJazzy/J.Tijn, etc etc etc. Bare brostep producers. Many people rock it.

If you built the exact same track in FL and Reaper (for instance) using only VST and VSTi plugins (no program-specific stock/in-built processing) then bounce both tunes at the exact same level, the waveforms will be identical.

In this day and age, the only differences between DAWs are their workflow and stock/built-in plugins and routing, e.g the mixer. This is what will actually impact you; not sound quality (even if it was an issue - which it's not)

People who diss FL probably do so because they don't like it's layout or workflow. This is the only valid reason for dissing any DAW.

edit: this thread should be in the 'production' section btw

fuck reason's sequencer

User avatar
forbidden
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:49 pm
Location: whales vagina
Contact:

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by forbidden » Mon Aug 26, 2013 7:10 am

£10 Bag wrote:FL's bad rep is a left-over from when it genuinely wasn't a proper DAW, back in versions 1 to 5 ish.

GregoryTJ
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 3:52 am
Location: Victor, MT

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by GregoryTJ » Mon Aug 26, 2013 7:16 am

£10 Bag wrote: If you built the exact same track in FL and Reaper (for instance) using only VST and VSTi plugins (no program-specific stock/in-built processing) then bounce both tunes at the exact same level, the waveforms will be identical.
Mostly true although randomizing inside of the vsts (phase probably) and slight differences in interpolation/dithering algorithms will lead to different waveforms from each DAW. Just pointing out completely useless facts. :lol:

Also the panning laws might be different.

User avatar
Electric_Head
Posts: 16958
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
Location: South of Africa
Contact:

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by Electric_Head » Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:10 am

It's probably because most ppl are assumed to be cracking it.
Image ImageImage Image
Image

didi
Posts: 3788
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:52 pm
Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_dvT8dttyQ
Contact:

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by didi » Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:59 am

Electric_Head wrote:It's probably because most ppl are assumed to be cracking it.
that's a gd point

it's not really the daw it's the perceived average user that gives fl the "bad rap"
[+]
bennyfroobs wrote:cool it vip is one of the best funky tracks of all time, hands down
[+]
Agent 47 wrote:photek? who is photek

photek is my mate whos a house dj from london lol
[+]
wolf89 wrote:Me and my mates play a game where we remember the worst or most obscure nu metal bands we can and listen to them when drunk

test_recordings
Posts: 5079
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:36 pm
Location: LEEDS

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by test_recordings » Mon Aug 26, 2013 12:17 pm

I personally just don't like it, but it is still perfectly functional.
Getzatrhythm

User avatar
Devilsindub
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:21 am
Location: L.A, Ca, U.S.A

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by Devilsindub » Mon Aug 26, 2013 1:39 pm

All these replies make sense. Thanks for clearing that up. Fl studio is a pretty reliable DAW for me, so that was a nagging question in my mind.
Divisionary/creAtures

Soundcloud
Soundcloud

User avatar
MUT3
Posts: 433
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:28 pm

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by MUT3 » Mon Aug 26, 2013 4:51 pm

I personally dont like having to map things to the mixer.

On top of that, i dont know how to duplicate a synth and a mixer channel at the same time. AFAIK you have to save the mixer channel then load it on the next one. Whereas in logic you only have to press "command + D"

So simple workflow things like that are the reason im not into FL.
ruckus49 wrote:in this post i defend hummus and celery sticks, as a healthy after school snack

User avatar
Devilsindub
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:21 am
Location: L.A, Ca, U.S.A

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by Devilsindub » Mon Aug 26, 2013 5:12 pm

That makes sense mut3. I started with fl many many years ago so I'm probably just used to doing the extra work.
Divisionary/creAtures

Soundcloud
Soundcloud

User avatar
Devilsindub
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:21 am
Location: L.A, Ca, U.S.A

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by Devilsindub » Mon Aug 26, 2013 5:16 pm

Oh and thanks for the heads up £10 Bag! I'm new to the forum so I'm not sure where to properly post stuff yet.
Divisionary/creAtures

Soundcloud
Soundcloud

User avatar
ineffable
Posts: 299
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 8:39 am
Location: São Paulo, Brasil

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by ineffable » Mon Aug 26, 2013 6:44 pm

FL being called "Fruity Loops" seems to piss people off too, its kinda silly.

User avatar
Gewze
Posts: 2660
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 10:07 pm

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by Gewze » Mon Aug 26, 2013 7:25 pm

i like fruity loops. nothing wrong with being fruity you prudes

TopManLurka
Posts: 2083
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:43 am

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by TopManLurka » Mon Aug 26, 2013 7:34 pm

read an interview with nero saying they still use fl.

/

User avatar
Devilsindub
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:21 am
Location: L.A, Ca, U.S.A

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by Devilsindub » Mon Aug 26, 2013 8:17 pm

You guys can check our tracks at [bandcamp][/bandcamp]/devilsindub. Not sure how to upload the tracks directly to the forum yet. Can anyone help with that?

-Comprodox
Divisionary/creAtures

Soundcloud
Soundcloud

User avatar
antipode
Posts: 4922
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:26 am

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by antipode » Mon Aug 26, 2013 11:37 pm

If it's good enough for Wen and Commodo it's good enough for me!
ParasiTTe wrote:FL being called "Fruity Loops" seems to piss people off too, its kinda silly.
Hasn't been called Fruity Loops for years.
jrkhnds wrote:
and I've never really rated dubstep..
- dubstepforum, 2014.

User avatar
Electric_Head
Posts: 16958
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
Location: South of Africa
Contact:

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by Electric_Head » Tue Aug 27, 2013 6:33 am

Devilsindub wrote:You guys can check our tracks at :q: . Not sure how to upload the tracks directly to the forum yet. Can anyone help with that?

-Comprodox
You created this thread just to big up your tunes?
Image ImageImage Image
Image

User avatar
Harkat
Posts: 6375
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:05 am
Location: GLASGOW

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by Harkat » Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:32 am

epochalypso wrote:If it's good enough for Wen and Commodo it's good enough for me!
ParasiTTe wrote:FL being called "Fruity Loops" seems to piss people off too, its kinda silly.
Hasn't been called Fruity Loops for years.
Haha, is that like Kitchen Fresh Chicken then?
RKM wrote: when bae hands u the aux mixtape and your squad blunted 9/11 aye lmao

User avatar
Devilsindub
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:21 am
Location: L.A, Ca, U.S.A

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by Devilsindub » Tue Aug 27, 2013 1:45 pm

I'm pretty much new so I don't even know what the hell a big up is. I wanted to show a valid example of what fl is capable of and what I was able to create with it. Not trying to spam anyone.
Divisionary/creAtures

Soundcloud
Soundcloud

User avatar
Electric_Head
Posts: 16958
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
Location: South of Africa
Contact:

Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?

Post by Electric_Head » Tue Aug 27, 2013 1:49 pm

Just realize that this is a production forum.
What give you the idea none of us know what FL can do.

Epoch listed Wen and Commodo above.
Image ImageImage Image
Image

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests