Special Announcement: We have migrated to a new forum platform community.dsf.ninja. The old forum is locked, but it will remain open for reading. Read more.

48 hour contest voting! FINALL

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum

vote for one in each battle not for the dots you stnuc

Poll ended at Sat Sep 07, 2013 9:19 pm

Mollema https://soundcloud.com/dsfcomp/mollema
12
67%
Boasson Hagen https://soundcloud.com/dsfcomp/boassen-hagen
6
33%
 
Total votes : 18

Postby Electric_Head » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:06 am

Icetickle wrote:@devilsindub: you lacked flow in you drop...

@Electric_Head: Not sure but I think your was really repetitive...

Mine was Majka..


Nah, not that repetitive.
I just didn't have a good track structure imo.

Certain styles of music lend themselves to a bit more repetition.
But I think because I wasn't able to EQ my track correctly it meant some of the elements were muddied and some of the elements I expected to be pushed back a bit more were overly upfront.

I blame my headphone amp blowing and having to produce on a sub par amping environment.
Rushing is never a good look.
Image ImageImage Image
Image
User avatar
Electric_Head
 
Posts:
16958
Joined:
Tue May 11, 2010 10:59 am
Location:
South of Africa

Postby Devilsindub » Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:05 pm

hutyluty wrote:
Devilsindub wrote:So I was thinking of creating a new thread for the reviews of all the tracks on this comp. I think it would be really productive for each producer to get some insight on there creations. Unless nobody gives a fuck of coarse. Who's down?


Go for it fella im sure people would appreciate it. All the tunes are still on thedsf comp page.


Sweet! Should I put the thread in production, review, or just SNH? Don't want to put it in the wrong place and have people bitch about it.
User avatar
Devilsindub
 
Posts:
327
Joined:
Sun Aug 25, 2013 5:21 am
Location:
L.A, Ca, U.S.A

Postby Electric_Head » Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:16 pm

It is production after all.
Image ImageImage Image
Image
User avatar
Electric_Head
 
Posts:
16958
Joined:
Tue May 11, 2010 10:59 am
Location:
South of Africa

Postby hutyluty » Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:34 pm

Devilsindub wrote:
hutyluty wrote:
Devilsindub wrote:So I was thinking of creating a new thread for the reviews of all the tracks on this comp. I think it would be really productive for each producer to get some insight on there creations. Unless nobody gives a fuck of coarse. Who's down?


Go for it fella im sure people would appreciate it. All the tunes are still on thedsf comp page.


Sweet! Should I put the thread in production, review, or just SNH? Don't want to put it in the wrong place and have people bitch about it.


put it in production i fink
[+] Spoiler
Phigure wrote:nothing was ever good
User avatar
hutyluty
 
Posts:
5240
Joined:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:04 pm
Location:
LEEDS

Postby BloomingAudioLife » Fri Sep 06, 2013 6:14 pm

Mine was Pinot, also nice one huty i really liked yours
original track
http://soundcloud.com/teoiric/teoiric-choices
Plastician wrote:what did the multivoice synth say to the lumberjack? TIMBRE
User avatar
BloomingAudioLife
 
Posts:
565
Joined:
Sat Dec 24, 2011 10:29 pm
Location:
tacompton

Postby Karoshi » Fri Sep 06, 2013 6:20 pm

Mine was Knee

Had loads of fun making it, first song i have "finished" in a long time.
https://soundcloud.com/snick01/karoshi-that-one-night

New track... :)

...Used to be snick01...
User avatar
Karoshi
 
Posts:
568
Joined:
Sat Jul 21, 2007 2:13 pm
Location:
Knowhere

Postby hutyluty » Fri Sep 06, 2013 9:20 pm

so it looks like we have a winner!

congratulations to jesslem o his tune, a worthy winner i think we all agree. should be another comp running next month so keep ur eyes peeled and thanks everyone who entered.
[+] Spoiler
Phigure wrote:nothing was ever good
User avatar
hutyluty
 
Posts:
5240
Joined:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:04 pm
Location:
LEEDS

Postby hutyluty » Fri Sep 06, 2013 9:25 pm

BloomingAudioLife wrote:Mine was Pinot, also nice one huty i really liked yours


nice 1

yeah i'll put some vocals on it at some point then put it up for dl

(as it is basically ripping off another tune so bad lol)
[+] Spoiler
Phigure wrote:nothing was ever good
User avatar
hutyluty
 
Posts:
5240
Joined:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:04 pm
Location:
LEEDS

Postby azuk » Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:17 pm

Electric_Head wrote:
Icetickle wrote:@devilsindub: you lacked flow in you drop...

@Electric_Head: Not sure but I think your was really repetitive...

Mine was Majka..


Nah, not that repetitive.
I just didn't have a good track structure imo.

Certain styles of music lend themselves to a bit more repetition.
But I think because I wasn't able to EQ my track correctly it meant some of the elements were muddied and some of the elements I expected to be pushed back a bit more were overly upfront.

I blame my headphone amp blowing and having to produce on a sub par amping environment.
Rushing is never a good look.


Bro, I did mine in an hour, without any headphones or speakers other than the built in one on the computer.
azuk
 
Posts:
249
Joined:
Fri Jun 14, 2013 5:19 pm

Postby mthrfnk » Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:21 pm

azuk wrote:
Electric_Head wrote:
Icetickle wrote:@devilsindub: you lacked flow in you drop...

@Electric_Head: Not sure but I think your was really repetitive...

Mine was Majka..


Nah, not that repetitive.
I just didn't have a good track structure imo.

Certain styles of music lend themselves to a bit more repetition.
But I think because I wasn't able to EQ my track correctly it meant some of the elements were muddied and some of the elements I expected to be pushed back a bit more were overly upfront.

I blame my headphone amp blowing and having to produce on a sub par amping environment.
Rushing is never a good look.


Bro, I did mine in an hour, without any headphones or speakers other than the built in one on the computer.

Want a medal?
mthrfnk
 
Posts:
2731
Joined:
Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:05 pm
Location:
UK

Postby Devilsindub » Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:23 pm

Interesting. I didn't think my flow lacked drop but I'm open to understand specifically what you mean. What exactly made the drop not flow?
User avatar
Devilsindub
 
Posts:
327
Joined:
Sun Aug 25, 2013 5:21 am
Location:
L.A, Ca, U.S.A

Postby azuk » Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:32 pm

mthrfnk wrote:
azuk wrote:
Electric_Head wrote:
Icetickle wrote:@devilsindub: you lacked flow in you drop...

@Electric_Head: Not sure but I think your was really repetitive...

Mine was Majka..


Nah, not that repetitive.
I just didn't have a good track structure imo.

Certain styles of music lend themselves to a bit more repetition.
But I think because I wasn't able to EQ my track correctly it meant some of the elements were muddied and some of the elements I expected to be pushed back a bit more were overly upfront.

I blame my headphone amp blowing and having to produce on a sub par amping environment.
Rushing is never a good look.


Bro, I did mine in an hour, without any headphones or speakers other than the built in one on the computer.

Want a medal?


Not really m8 :)
azuk
 
Posts:
249
Joined:
Fri Jun 14, 2013 5:19 pm

Postby Devilsindub » Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:38 pm

azuk wrote:
mthrfnk wrote:
azuk wrote:
Electric_Head wrote:
Icetickle wrote:@devilsindub: you lacked flow in you drop...

@Electric_Head: Not sure but I think your was really repetitive...

Mine was Majka..


Nah, not that repetitive.
I just didn't have a good track structure imo.

Certain styles of music lend themselves to a bit more repetition.
But I think because I wasn't able to EQ my track correctly it meant some of the elements were muddied and some of the elements I expected to be pushed back a bit more were overly upfront.

I blame my headphone amp blowing and having to produce on a sub par amping environment.
Rushing is never a good look.


Bro, I did mine in an hour, without any headphones or speakers other than the built in one on the computer.

Want a medal?


Not really m8 :)


:corndance:
User avatar
Devilsindub
 
Posts:
327
Joined:
Sun Aug 25, 2013 5:21 am
Location:
L.A, Ca, U.S.A

Postby mthrfnk » Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:41 pm

azuk wrote:
mthrfnk wrote:
azuk wrote:
Electric_Head wrote:
Icetickle wrote:@devilsindub: you lacked flow in you drop...

@Electric_Head: Not sure but I think your was really repetitive...

Mine was Majka..


Nah, not that repetitive.
I just didn't have a good track structure imo.

Certain styles of music lend themselves to a bit more repetition.
But I think because I wasn't able to EQ my track correctly it meant some of the elements were muddied and some of the elements I expected to be pushed back a bit more were overly upfront.

I blame my headphone amp blowing and having to produce on a sub par amping environment.
Rushing is never a good look.


Bro, I did mine in an hour, without any headphones or speakers other than the built in one on the computer.

Want a medal?


Not really m8 :)

Why not :(
mthrfnk
 
Posts:
2731
Joined:
Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:05 pm
Location:
UK

Postby azuk » Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:54 pm

mthrfnk wrote:Why not :(

I'm loaded with em. :lol:
azuk
 
Posts:
249
Joined:
Fri Jun 14, 2013 5:19 pm

Postby rickyarbino » Sat Sep 07, 2013 5:45 am

I would like to take this opportunity to say YAY.


Thanks for voting, glad people liked the tune!
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
rickyarbino
 
Posts:
4508
Joined:
Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:07 pm
Location:
Eternity

Postby Karoshi » Sun Sep 08, 2013 12:19 am

Congrats! good tune!
https://soundcloud.com/snick01/karoshi-that-one-night

New track... :)

...Used to be snick01...
User avatar
Karoshi
 
Posts:
568
Joined:
Sat Jul 21, 2007 2:13 pm
Location:
Knowhere

This forum is locked. Continue the discussion by creating a new topic on The New Dubstep Forum.
Previous

Return to Production, Hardware & Technical