Expensive Sound?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- Gurnumsbug
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 11:33 pm
- Contact:
Expensive Sound?
What is it? & how can I achieve it?
intro
intro
These are just the obvious 2.. I can;t figure it out beside the piano and strings.. Is it the composition?
intro
intro
These are just the obvious 2.. I can;t figure it out beside the piano and strings.. Is it the composition?
Re: Expensive Sound?
there is definitely a lot of outboard gear that powers a song like this (good dynamic range with very high perceived loudness) but really it's production knowledge that makes tunes like this what they are. these are not noob bedroom producer tracks, each element is recorded and mixed in a professional treated environment, by professionals who have been doing this for years upon years.
Re: Expensive Sound?
Very saturated / gritty sounds.
I would experiment with bit-crushing, distortion, overdrive, filtering etc. Try them in small amounts, in series, in parallel etc.
That will give you that gritty-ness. The rest of it is just good mixing
I would experiment with bit-crushing, distortion, overdrive, filtering etc. Try them in small amounts, in series, in parallel etc.
That will give you that gritty-ness. The rest of it is just good mixing
Soundcloud
Online Mastering//FAQ//Studio
Evolution Mastering (Analogue/Digital) : 1st track Free sample + 50% off.
What Is Mastering?
http://www.facebook.com/outbounduk
Online Mastering//FAQ//Studio
Evolution Mastering (Analogue/Digital) : 1st track Free sample + 50% off.
What Is Mastering?
http://www.facebook.com/outbounduk
Re: Expensive Sound?
These don't sound that amazing to be honest.
Mixing, mastering?
Mixing, mastering?
Re: Expensive Sound?
yeah neither of those mixes totally blow me away TBH, but #2 has some nice stuff going on.
"expensive" sounding mixes in a nutshell?
--a dynamic, performed "mix." Mix is a verb.
--great performances from the musicians or vocalist (if there is a vocalist)
--proper amount of dynamic control-- ie, you never hear the vocal compression working on "blurred lines" or "get lucky," but it's there, and lets you really increase the emotional content of the material
--across the spectrum, a good balance of energy in the frequencies. Obviously this changes per song/genre, but in genenral enough 40-80hz to feel full, not too much 100, 250, 500, enough presence at 1k, not too much harshness at 2-4k, enough air at 12-16k
--not swathed in cheap effects (obvious reverbs, corny delays, etc). There are plenty of tunes with glaringly obvious delay sounds, which are part of the tune-- great. they don't sound like a preset on freeware. work to make it the RIGHT effect for the part/song/project/etc.
none of this is really technique-based-- all about listening and making the right decisions. And, ideally, gutsy decisions that let parts come alive. Distortion, saturation, phase alignment-- and knowing which piece of gear or plugin is going to give you the RIGHT tone for the song-- all play a part.
Dave Pensado's recent interview with Tony Maserati goes really deep into this stuff. Listen and learn.
"expensive" sounding mixes in a nutshell?
--a dynamic, performed "mix." Mix is a verb.
--great performances from the musicians or vocalist (if there is a vocalist)
--proper amount of dynamic control-- ie, you never hear the vocal compression working on "blurred lines" or "get lucky," but it's there, and lets you really increase the emotional content of the material
--across the spectrum, a good balance of energy in the frequencies. Obviously this changes per song/genre, but in genenral enough 40-80hz to feel full, not too much 100, 250, 500, enough presence at 1k, not too much harshness at 2-4k, enough air at 12-16k
--not swathed in cheap effects (obvious reverbs, corny delays, etc). There are plenty of tunes with glaringly obvious delay sounds, which are part of the tune-- great. they don't sound like a preset on freeware. work to make it the RIGHT effect for the part/song/project/etc.
none of this is really technique-based-- all about listening and making the right decisions. And, ideally, gutsy decisions that let parts come alive. Distortion, saturation, phase alignment-- and knowing which piece of gear or plugin is going to give you the RIGHT tone for the song-- all play a part.
Dave Pensado's recent interview with Tony Maserati goes really deep into this stuff. Listen and learn.
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
Re: Expensive Sound?
The first video has something really obvious going on with the vocals and maybe the bass as well, compression probably.
Re: Expensive Sound?
Watched this the other day, those guys are just amazing.Sharmaji wrote: Dave Pensado's recent interview with Tony Maserati goes really deep into this stuff. Listen and learn.
I was surprised by a few things he said too...
Re: Expensive Sound?
^ no joke. Maserati and his crew have mixed a few projects i've been involved in; you send them what you think is a banging rough mix, better than other mixes out there, pat yourself on the back, and...
your shit comes back with this layer of magic on it. Really really incredible.
your shit comes back with this layer of magic on it. Really really incredible.
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
Re: Expensive Sound?
Yeah I can believe that tbh.Sharmaji wrote:^ no joke. Maserati and his crew have mixed a few projects i've been involved in; you send them what you think is a banging rough mix, better than other mixes out there, pat yourself on the back, and...
your shit comes back with this layer of magic on it. Really really incredible.
Like I don't really like Blurred Lines, but that track is so punchy yet so smooth, and some of the things he talked about in Pensado's interview I never picked up till I relistened to it.
Re: Expensive Sound?
Link?mthrfnk wrote:Yeah I can believe that tbh.Sharmaji wrote:^ no joke. Maserati and his crew have mixed a few projects i've been involved in; you send them what you think is a banging rough mix, better than other mixes out there, pat yourself on the back, and...
your shit comes back with this layer of magic on it. Really really incredible.
Like I don't really like Blurred Lines, but that track is so punchy yet so smooth, and some of the things he talked about in Pensado's interview I never picked up till I relistened to it.
Depth is a delusion, the deeper you look the less you see.
Re: Expensive Sound?
Watching these vids makes me seem shit lol, like I can understand a lot of what they are on about, but with what I do I don't really do any of this high end engineering shit lol
OiOiii #BELTERTopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming
Re: Expensive Sound?
Ew Protools
but seriously super informative.
- Gurnumsbug
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 11:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: Expensive Sound?
great interview mate! showed me so much! sounds like genuine cat too..Sharmaji wrote:^ no joke. Maserati and his crew have mixed a few projects i've been involved in; you send them what you think is a banging rough mix, better than other mixes out there, pat yourself on the back, and...
your shit comes back with this layer of magic on it. Really really incredible.
one more for those who still don't know what I mean
Re: Expensive Sound?
Thanks for that, man. I'mma watch it.mthrfnk wrote:
And to OP, it's because they either use live recordings, or really good samples, and then good mixing, then mastering.
- safeandsound
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 5:47 pm
- Location: London UK
- Contact:
Re: Expensive Sound?
Engineering experience and the best equipment money can are the requirements. You can normally see (hear?) through "tricks" in direct comparison with actual expensive productions.
Familiarization with high quality sound from .wav file sources is an absolute must in the world of mp3/AAC and Youtube. Even though the best sound can sometimes shine through this muddy file set, listening to a minimum of 16bit PCM will provide great insight to the difference between the best and "also ran".
SafeandSound Mastering
http://www.masteringmastering.co.uk/ana ... ering.html
Familiarization with high quality sound from .wav file sources is an absolute must in the world of mp3/AAC and Youtube. Even though the best sound can sometimes shine through this muddy file set, listening to a minimum of 16bit PCM will provide great insight to the difference between the best and "also ran".
SafeandSound Mastering
http://www.masteringmastering.co.uk/ana ... ering.html
Re: Expensive Sound?
Watch all the pensado vids, they're literally producer GOLD!
aka blinkesko
Soundcloud
Jesus Loves Electro - Burning Love (Augment remix)
Spotify: http://spoti.fi/1m5GUjL
iTunes: http://bit.ly/1iHWose
Soundcloud
Jesus Loves Electro - Burning Love (Augment remix)
Spotify: http://spoti.fi/1m5GUjL
iTunes: http://bit.ly/1iHWose
Re: Expensive Sound?
It is also a trap.
If you're already 98% there, take this step.
Otherwise, work on the other 60% you're likely lacking. You will see better roi.
If you're already 98% there, take this step.
Otherwise, work on the other 60% you're likely lacking. You will see better roi.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests



