Do Google and YouTube Search Engines Block Inconvenient Truth? A Case Study
NEW YORK, Oct. 9, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ – The 9/11 Consensus Panel reports that a study published Saturday, by the Centre for Research on Globalization, presents compelling evidence that a September 8 broadcast from the international news giant Russia Todaywas blocked not only within the Google and YouTube search engines, but also by private email interference.At the 12th anniversary of 9/11, RT‘s popular program “The Truthseeker” ran a 13-minute episode, “9/11 and Operation Gladio“, presenting new historical evidence that began to go viral.
Bob McIlvaine, whose son Robert perished in a North Tower lobby explosion, remains anguished by questions about how the Towers fell, and by the thousands of first responder deaths and the millions killed in illegal Middle East wars.
Five 9/11 historians presented evidence from original media footage, witness testimonies, and recently declassified documents.
Historian Dr. Daniele Ganser of the Swiss Institute for Peace and Energy Research, explained that using a “false flag” operation, a country can bomb itself in order to manufacture public consent to blame and attack another country.
Jonathan Cole of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth reported high-tech nano-thermite, an incendiary used for implosions, throughout the WTC dust.
118 firefighters, insistent about hearing bombs and explosives in the Towers, were studied by Dr. Graeme MacQueen, co-editor of The Journal of 9/11 Studies.
Dr. David Ray Griffin’s 9/11 Consensus Panel, and ReThink911, emphasized the straight-down freefall collapse of skyscraper WTC7 when its 84 massive steel columns all failed simultaneously.
This RT episode, seen on YouTube by a quarter of a million people in its first three days, suddenly flat-lined September 11, when viewing virtually stopped.
The study begins: “With polls consistently showing that approximately 50% of Canadians and Americans doubt the official story of 9/11, the feat of keeping a lid on mainstream public debate for over 12 years has been nothing short of miraculous.”
A careful analysis follows, showing that the RT title and URL were decoupled from the YouTube and Google indexes, and could not be transmitted by email during the weeks that followed.
Did RT change the YouTube privacy setting because of political pressure? Or was there covert search engine interference?
Whatever happened, the program died, and the lid stayed on.
What will take the lid off is the long-awaited encyclopedic Mazzucco documentary, sure to become the standard historical authority on 9/11.
I assume Gladio is common knowledge so you know how Nato used former troops as a cold war defense mechanism which is fairly unremarkable until they were used to blow up innocent civilians to shape popular/political opinion, and thus you are just being unfunnily snarky.
You can find that video now, but as of the 11th of sept, you could not. This isn't surprising, nonviolent political content is often filtered at peak use/impact and then unfiltered after, it is just one interesting case study of how this is done.
I assume Gladio is common knowledge so you know how Nato used former troops as a cold war defense mechanism which is fairly unremarkable until they were used to blow up innocent civilians to shape popular/political opinion, and thus you are just being unfunnily snarky.
You can find that video now, but as of the 11th of sept, you could not. This isn't surprising, nonviolent political content is often filtered at peak use/impact and then unfiltered after, it is just one interesting case study of how this is done.
Fairly sure I've just read a Jack Reacher book which has a similar plot. Militia group in Montana believes NATO operates a secret army with Chinese & French troops fighting side by side to enforce the global will of the World Bank and it's minions.
Luckily Jack Reacher is the right man in the wrong place to put an end to their evil schemes.
Conspiracy hokum used to distract people from the far scarier truth, IMO.
I assume Gladio is common knowledge so you know how Nato used former troops as a cold war defense mechanism which is fairly unremarkable until they were used to blow up innocent civilians to shape popular/political opinion, and thus you are just being unfunnily snarky.
You can find that video now, but as of the 11th of sept, you could not. This isn't surprising, nonviolent political content is often filtered at peak use/impact and then unfiltered after, it is just one interesting case study of how this is done.
Fairly sure I've just read a Jack Reacher book which has a similar plot. Militia group in Montana believes NATO operates a secret army with Chinese & French troops fighting side by side to enforce the global will of the World Bank and it's minions.
Luckily Jack Reacher is the right man in the wrong place to put an end to their evil schemes.
Conspiracy hokum used to distract people from the far scarier truth, IMO.
Yeah, no. No correlation to what is discussed in NATO's Secret Armies. But your knee jerk superficial understanding is always appreciated.
You lose points for not using the word 'sheeple' in your condescension. It smacks of putting people down and calling their understandings out as 'superficial' because they don't share the same conspiracy opinions as yourself.
Why not try engaging in discussion instead of just shooting down? Or flip it around onto people who disagree with you, your call.
My point of view on these sort of theories is that people want to believe to detract from a scarier truth...that there is no conspiracy. Things happen because of the evil of human nature, and it's an evil that a lot of folk don't want to (or are unable to) confront.
The idea of the world being rudderless is far more terrifying IMO than the idea there is some shadow council pulling the strings on the global stage. Some people want to believe in the wizard behind the curtain so badly because the alternative would lead to some serious questions about the futility of existence in general
(NB; not saying everything is preordained, manifest destiny etc etc)
There are not many companies that want their advertisements popping up on this video, unless they were selling conspiracy dvds and conspiracy books and conspiracy seminar places.
This was a neutral public statement made by the association of Devil Advocates Ltd.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.
lol @ trying to depict every conspiracist/conspiracy theory as a nutjob/work of a nutjob
"If your chest ain't rattlin it ain't happenin'" - DJ Pinch
"Move pples bodies and stimulate their minds"
we just ride the wave
Life sucks; Get used² it.
The thing with the 9/11 conspiracy is that everyone with an internet connection turns into a fucking published demolition expert. And I've been hearing various supposed demolition experts hear completely opposite things on the matter. But who gave me the damn authority to pass a judgement on it?
Was a 9/11 an inside job? I don't know. Is that so fucking hard to say? I don't know a thing or two about demolition. But ruling it out because "lol conspiracy theorists r stupid" or "the state wouldn't do it" are insane. False flags have happened so often through-out history, by the west even, all through-out the 20th century. States, even your states, pull that shit all the time. Countering wub's point, I could say that people that outright deny conspiracy theorists are scared of the idea that their noble and selfless protectors, aka the government, could turn on them on any moment and would rather keep the hdead in the ground to avoid the fear. It's not necessarily what I believe. But there's just no point in painting people who believe a certain thing with an incredibly broad stroak without wanting to hear out their individual motivation to believe what they believe.
I think the possibility is quite realistic, but heck, fucked If I know. If it's true.
