FabFilter Pro-MB -- looks incredible
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
claudedefaren
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:57 am
FabFilter Pro-MB -- looks incredible
http://www.fabfilter.com/products/pro-m ... er-plug-in
here just watch this demo vid and see how fantastic this is
here just watch this demo vid and see how fantastic this is
Re: FabFilter Pro-MB -- looks incredible
I've compared the sound of Fabfilter Pro-Q and Pro-C with Izotope EQ and Dynamics. Guess who won? izotope won
I did the same with fabfilter pro-q and Ableton 9 EQ8.. eq8 sounded better
Still have to do the fabilter saturn (an amazing plugin) with Izotope Exciter...
I did the same with fabfilter pro-q and Ableton 9 EQ8.. eq8 sounded better
Still have to do the fabilter saturn (an amazing plugin) with Izotope Exciter...
Depth is a delusion, the deeper you look the less you see.
Re: FabFilter Pro-MB -- looks incredible
This looks pretty good imo. Definitely on the demo list.
-
TheReptilianElite
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2013 12:13 pm
-
claudedefaren
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:57 am
Re: FabFilter Pro-MB -- looks incredible
I know this is going to be hard to take without offense, but there is no ill-intent behind this: I have serious doubt for your credentials after you've said what I bolded there.Icetickle wrote:I've compared the sound of Fabfilter Pro-Q and Pro-C with Izotope EQ and Dynamics. Guess who won? izotope won
I did the same with fabfilter pro-q and Ableton 9 EQ8.. eq8 sounded better
Still have to do the fabilter saturn (an amazing plugin) with Izotope Exciter...
I suggest comparing FabFIlter Pro-L to iZotope's Limiter in Ozone.
As far as the FF vs iZotope EQ, it depends on what you're looking for from an EQ. iZotope's can do some analog modeled nonsense, that's cool, but not what Pro-Q was built to do. The interface stomps all over iZotope's in terms of usability, white space, cleanliness.. every design aspect, really. (previous design major)
But what does "sounds better" mean to you? Pleasing coloration? Pro-Q isn't intended for that. The digital phase is more important to consider when choosing an EQ. Make a drastic dip in the midrange of a kick drum with Ableton's EQ8. Do the same thing with Pro-Q. Even when NOT in linear phase mode, it kicks EQ8's ass. Get the tool Dan used in this video up above there and try it out on those two plugins.
And personally I think FabFilter Saturn needs to handle the cross-points with less phase-shifting than it currently does -- and it would be truly outstanding. Much like iZotope did with the Hybrid crossover mode. That's the only advantage the iZotope Exciter has over Saturn. My opinion.
It's all whatever though -- this thread is about Pro-MB, not Pro-Q or Pro-C. Demo it, then make your verdict on it.
-
sigmund floyd
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:49 pm
- Location: Montreal/new york
Re: FabFilter Pro-MB -- looks incredible
this looks dope...too bad theres no side chain input though(as it seems)
edit; it actually does take side chain...sick, can't watch the video as im in class
edit; it actually does take side chain...sick, can't watch the video as im in class
Last edited by sigmund floyd on Thu Oct 17, 2013 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
claudedefaren
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:57 am
-
claudedefaren
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:57 am
Re: FabFilter Pro-MB -- looks incredible
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... Wuhs#t=334
right at that point he demonstrates it sidechaining
right at that point he demonstrates it sidechaining
Re: FabFilter Pro-MB -- looks incredible
I was simply doing the same thing in both EQs and picking the one that sounds better to me. The interface and the ease of use is great tho.claudedefaren wrote:I know this is going to be hard to take without offense, but there is no ill-intent behind this: I have serious doubt for your credentials after you've said what I bolded there.Icetickle wrote:I've compared the sound of Fabfilter Pro-Q and Pro-C with Izotope EQ and Dynamics. Guess who won? izotope won
I did the same with fabfilter pro-q and Ableton 9 EQ8.. eq8 sounded better
Still have to do the fabilter saturn (an amazing plugin) with Izotope Exciter...
I suggest comparing FabFIlter Pro-L to iZotope's Limiter in Ozone.
As far as the FF vs iZotope EQ, it depends on what you're looking for from an EQ. iZotope's can do some analog modeled nonsense, that's cool, but not what Pro-Q was built to do. The interface stomps all over iZotope's in terms of usability, white space, cleanliness.. every design aspect, really. (previous design major)
But what does "sounds better" mean to you? Pleasing coloration? Pro-Q isn't intended for that. The digital phase is more important to consider when choosing an EQ. Make a drastic dip in the midrange of a kick drum with Ableton's EQ8. Do the same thing with Pro-Q. Even when NOT in linear phase mode, it kicks EQ8's ass. Get the tool Dan used in this video up above there and try it out on those two plugins.
And personally I think FabFilter Saturn needs to handle the cross-points with less phase-shifting than it currently does -- and it would be truly outstanding. Much like iZotope did with the Hybrid crossover mode. That's the only advantage the iZotope Exciter has over Saturn. My opinion.
It's all whatever though -- this thread is about Pro-MB, not Pro-Q or Pro-C. Demo it, then make your verdict on it.
Depth is a delusion, the deeper you look the less you see.
-
claudedefaren
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:57 am
Re: FabFilter Pro-MB -- looks incredible
Fair, but I do suggest trying the phase thing out 
Re: FabFilter Pro-MB -- looks incredible
Looks good. I get myself into trouble a lot by resampling maybe more than I should. A mbc that I could rely on to help me restructure resampled parts would be a god send.
Re: FabFilter Pro-MB -- looks incredible
Fabfilter make the highest quality processing, if something else sounds better to you that's possible of course,
but these plugins are used by the biggest names in the business.
Anyway, I'm not a big fan of using multi band compression so I won't jump on this immediately.
More excited about Slate's new VMR thing.
but these plugins are used by the biggest names in the business.
Anyway, I'm not a big fan of using multi band compression so I won't jump on this immediately.
More excited about Slate's new VMR thing.
Agent 47 wrote:Next time I can think of something, I will.
Re: FabFilter Pro-MB -- looks incredible
I hate myself for hating on this one. :'(
Depth is a delusion, the deeper you look the less you see.
Re: FabFilter Pro-MB -- looks incredible
When Slate started releasing plugs, I thought it would be jokes. He is actually bringing the major heat.AxeD wrote:Slate's new VMR thing.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests