Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post Reply
User avatar
antman
Posts: 367
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:44 pm
Location: Staten Island, NY

Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by antman » Tue Apr 02, 2013 4:02 am

:u:

Any tips on the sound design behind these guys?

You guys know what im talking about, those really bouncy wub wub wub sounds.

So far ive been avoiding LFO's and sticking with one shot envelopes. Im also using really quick subtle delays but I cant seem to get that proper deeeeeep wub.

Using massive, any tips?
Last edited by antman on Tue Apr 02, 2013 4:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
cmgoodman1226 wrote:I don't know what you all are going on about. I listened to it on my beatz by dre headphones that my parents bought me for mixing, and the sub sounds huge! stop hay-in'.
Soundcloud

User avatar
ephyks
Posts: 344
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:53 pm

Re: Da wub wubs - Requake, 50 carrot, p0gman

Post by ephyks » Tue Apr 02, 2013 4:29 am

antman wrote::u:

Any tips on the sound design behind these guys?

You guys know what im talking about, those really bouncy wub wub wub sounds.

So far ive been avoiding LFO's and sticking with one shot envelopes. Im also using really quick subtle delays but I cant seem to get that proper deeeeeep wub.

Using massive, any tips?
Please, off yourself for calling it a "wub".

I'm pretty sure there's a subfiltronik project file out there with that sound. Dunno where, but that's the sound I think you're looking for.
Coolschmid wrote:Just buy as many $200 synths as possible so you can be bad at all of them.
Soundcloud

User avatar
antman
Posts: 367
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:44 pm
Location: Staten Island, NY

Re: Da wub wubs - Requake, 50 carrot, p0gman

Post by antman » Tue Apr 02, 2013 4:33 am

ephyks wrote:
antman wrote::u:

Any tips on the sound design behind these guys?

You guys know what im talking about, those really bouncy wub wub wub sounds.

So far ive been avoiding LFO's and sticking with one shot envelopes. Im also using really quick subtle delays but I cant seem to get that proper deeeeeep wub.

Using massive, any tips?
Please, off yourself for calling it a "wub".

I'm pretty sure there's a subfiltronik project file out there with that sound. Dunno where, but that's the sound I think you're looking for.

Well I mean what other way is there to describe the sound?

So you mean to tell me the sound at 1:08 doesnt sound like "WUUUB"

Sorry if wub seems to have brostep attached to it nowadays but this certainly isnt brosteppish, and im simply using a word to describe the sound the best way someone would understand it. So please "off yourself" for telling me to "off myself" for saying wub.

cmgoodman1226 wrote:I don't know what you all are going on about. I listened to it on my beatz by dre headphones that my parents bought me for mixing, and the sub sounds huge! stop hay-in'.
Soundcloud

Ledger
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 6:17 pm

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by Ledger » Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:03 am

The common name for a "wub" bass for those literate enough to understand it, is called a wobble bass, or at least that's one common name for it, not "wub". :a:
fragments wrote:I am sure there are a million shitty "EDM" producers all jerking each other off with their "cool tune bro feedback4feedback" posts and "net labels".

User avatar
antman
Posts: 367
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:44 pm
Location: Staten Island, NY

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by antman » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:34 pm

sofarmusic wrote:The common name for a "wub" bass for those literate enough to understand it, is called a wobble bass, or at least that's one common name for it, not "wub". :a:
But these are not wobbles. Wobbles are sounds that use an LFO to get that wobble sound.

These sounds are one shot basses that are repeated through midi notes and do not use an LFO.
cmgoodman1226 wrote:I don't know what you all are going on about. I listened to it on my beatz by dre headphones that my parents bought me for mixing, and the sub sounds huge! stop hay-in'.
Soundcloud

Ledger
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 6:17 pm

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by Ledger » Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:45 pm

antman wrote:
sofarmusic wrote:The common name for a "wub" bass for those literate enough to understand it, is called a wobble bass, or at least that's one common name for it, not "wub". :a:
But these are not wobbles. Wobbles are sounds that use an LFO to get that wobble sound.

These sounds are one shot basses that are repeated through midi notes and do not use an LFO.
That is either an LFO, or just a simple automation. MalleusDUB makes basses like that on a daily basis. :dunce:
fragments wrote:I am sure there are a million shitty "EDM" producers all jerking each other off with their "cool tune bro feedback4feedback" posts and "net labels".

User avatar
Dahneboy
Posts: 206
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:32 pm

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by Dahneboy » Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:33 pm

its really easy its actually all done in massive , put all the amp knobs pointing to 12 o clock and add lfo with a ramp and leave one amp slightly effected by the lfo to give some noise and it wont sound too qweer , expirement with carbon wave tables and sine shaper, and +/ - who knows you might make a better sounding bass just having fun with it.

Btoku420
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 3:28 am

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by Btoku420 » Thu Nov 14, 2013 9:19 am

ditch massive and get razor for reaktor. the sheer nature of the synth just sounds sooooo much thicker than massive

lowpass on filter 1 + comb peak on filter 2
set LFO2 to Phase
assign LFO1 to the lowpass cutoff (duh)
assign LFO2 to the comb filter's phase knob
crank the shit out of the resonance. not all the way, but a lot
the upwards ramping LFOs get you that bubble noise texture
you can use the cutoff on the comb filter to get more variations
just play around with everything else

the key is the low cutoff, high resonance, and the upwards ramping LFO shape. the wavetables don't really matter here. avoid using the more harmonic wavetables.

the main wobble was made all in razor.
https://soundcloud.com/tokudubs/shadow- ... er-t-o-k-u

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by wub » Thu Nov 14, 2013 9:30 am

I really hate my choice of name sometimes :(

RARRR_
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:57 am

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by RARRR_ » Thu Nov 14, 2013 10:14 am

When i made patches like this I called em werps ;)

User avatar
killakam98
Posts: 219
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:18 am
Location: CPD, NY
Contact:

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by killakam98 » Mon Nov 18, 2013 2:47 am

antman wrote::u:

Any tips on the sound design behind these guys?

You guys know what im talking about, those really bouncy wub wub wub sounds.

So far ive been avoiding LFO's and sticking with one shot envelopes. Im also using really quick subtle delays but I cant seem to get that proper deeeeeep wub.

Using massive, any tips?
stop using lfos and envelopes and start using performer
performer can be a lfo and a tempo synced envelope
just load a duckorgan and daft filter
or get reason (where the style of music originated from?
WICKED
Soundcloud
DREAMZ
Soundcloud
BASS MUSIC MISC.
Soundcloud

User avatar
kaili
Posts: 1357
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:07 am
Location: Ibiza

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by kaili » Mon Nov 18, 2013 6:27 pm

comb filters
Collab with GeNRL: http://www.soundcloud.com/genrli
140 related stuff:
https://soundcloud.com/kailimusic/
Soundcloud
Seriousub wrote:I do enjoy swinging my spine to the sound of a strong snare running around 140

User avatar
R3b_Official
Posts: 574
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by R3b_Official » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:38 am

This "wubby" enough for you guys?

Needs work to get more of a full sound, but everything is there. Made with stock ableton junk.

Soundcloud
Check out my youtube videos and Soundcloud
https://r3b_official.toneden.io/#
Soundcloud
Image

MoonUnit
Posts: 267
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 6:13 pm

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by MoonUnit » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:06 pm

sofarmusic wrote:The common name for a "wub" bass for those literate enough to understand it, is called a wobble bass, or at least that's one common name for it, not "wub". :a:
How about focusing on defining how the sound is made, not what to call it. If you can't get past that, you're not getting anywhere.

vkram
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 6:19 am

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by vkram » Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:37 am

hey guys , i tried making this patch on massive and used it in this link , you can hear it at 1:12 something . If you think its similar to P0gman's wub lemme know , i am ready to share it !!
https://soundcloud.com/agyaat/untitled-wip

peace!

LURCH
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:25 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by LURCH » Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:40 pm

w0bs m8 :corntard:
<vax>: if there's no threat of trainwreck there's no adrenaline

User avatar
Clutchkick
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2013 4:38 pm
Location: Myrtle Beach, South Carolina

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by Clutchkick » Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:08 pm

I have been trying to get this really smooth sound in massive like in this song here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRggcp8Odec

Any tips? I can figure out the modulation.. I just can't figure out how to get such a clean sound from massive. Thanks :)
Soundcloud
New one

Ledger
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 6:17 pm

Re: Wubs - Requake, megalodon, p0gman

Post by Ledger » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:08 pm

To answer this post on the sound design part (if it hasn't already been answered [too lazy to actually read all of it]), I actually mistakenly made a pretty similar sound. To me it sounds similar, but it could be exact, even though mine just doesn't have an LP filter. Anyways, I made it in Reason, and here is the patch.

By the way, the bitcrusher is merely a subtle effect in my patch, but it just makes it sound so much better imo.

Also, the process is image 1, image 2, then image 3. Just to be safe. :cornlol:
[+] Spoiler
Image
[+] Spoiler
Image
[+] Spoiler
Image
fragments wrote:I am sure there are a million shitty "EDM" producers all jerking each other off with their "cool tune bro feedback4feedback" posts and "net labels".

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests