Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:53 pm
Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
I played FL studio for few months and I suck at it, yeah, I'm a newbie, and I created a song, and I have seen some synthesizers that are popular, and I'm deciding to get one, they are Harmor, Massive and Harmless, I actually want to produce dubstep, electronic music, so guys, any suggestion on which one I should buy?
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
Buying one of those synths won't automatically mean you won't suck any more. Learn the synths that came with FLStudio (3xOSC, TS404, Toxic Biohazard, Morpheus, Poizone) inside out before you buy another one, IMO.
There is more than enough variety there to get a range of sounds, and long term your sound design will be benefit a lot more than if you just get a new synth as a result of hitting a roadblock.
There is more than enough variety there to get a range of sounds, and long term your sound design will be benefit a lot more than if you just get a new synth as a result of hitting a roadblock.
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
^^^ Best advice this thread will throw at you tbh. You could have one synth, and still be able to achieve most sounds.
You could have one synth and use that for every element of your track, drums, bass, pads, everything.
You could have one synth and use that for every element of your track, drums, bass, pads, everything.
- Bass_Jacka
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:14 am
- Location: Saff East London!
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
While it is true that simply purchasing a decent synth wont automatically make you a good music producer, I believe that it can open more possibilities.
It is worth learning the synths that come with your DAW inside out, and this will help you get to grips with other synths. I disagree with the opinion that all you need is the native synths that come with a DAW; if this were true other synths wouldn't exist and the big producers would only be using native synths.
Personally I've never used Harmor or Harmless, however I do use Massive and I'll always recommend it as a beast of a synth; definitely worth buying if you can afford it.
That being said though, it would be worth your while just fully getting to grips with your DAW and the plugins that come with it for now; you've only been producing for a few months, who knows, in another couple of months you may decide producing music isn't for you and you'd have wasted a lot of money on a synth you'll never use!
If you suck at using your DAW (FL) then having a decent synth wont make any difference, you need to learn how to use your DAW first.
It is worth learning the synths that come with your DAW inside out, and this will help you get to grips with other synths. I disagree with the opinion that all you need is the native synths that come with a DAW; if this were true other synths wouldn't exist and the big producers would only be using native synths.
Personally I've never used Harmor or Harmless, however I do use Massive and I'll always recommend it as a beast of a synth; definitely worth buying if you can afford it.
That being said though, it would be worth your while just fully getting to grips with your DAW and the plugins that come with it for now; you've only been producing for a few months, who knows, in another couple of months you may decide producing music isn't for you and you'd have wasted a lot of money on a synth you'll never use!
If you suck at using your DAW (FL) then having a decent synth wont make any difference, you need to learn how to use your DAW first.
Soundcloud
..............................................................................................................................................
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty - Sir Winston Churchill
..............................................................................................................................................
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty - Sir Winston Churchill
- Crimsonghost
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 6:59 am
- Location: Belly of the beastmode
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
You have to take into consideration that EVERYONE uses massive. So clearly he would want it because everyone else has it. Nothing wrong with that. It's a really great synth that you should have. It's also dead easy to learn and has about a billion youtube tuts on how to make sounds with. It's also easy to get inspiration from even the presets (and 3rd party banks).
So, in effect, buying massive could (arguably) make you a better producer seing as it's hard to not learn how to use it to its potental.
Honestly there nothing wrong with wanting new gear as a noob producer (that's how I ended up worth Maschine). As long as it inspires you to create and/or learn, than its a good investment.
So, in effect, buying massive could (arguably) make you a better producer seing as it's hard to not learn how to use it to its potental.
Honestly there nothing wrong with wanting new gear as a noob producer (that's how I ended up worth Maschine). As long as it inspires you to create and/or learn, than its a good investment.
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
Everything but no 3xosc, please. It has aliasing problems. When you play a higher note on it, it tries to synthesize harmonics that are higher than the sampling rate - and the digital-to-analog converter interprets them as subharmonics. Horrible synth. Well, actually it wouldn't be horrible if it didn't have that problem. But that is what makes it horrible.wub wrote:Buying one of those synths won't automatically mean you won't suck any more. Learn the synths that came with FLStudio (3xOSC, TS404, Toxic Biohazard, Morpheus, Poizone) inside out before you buy another one, IMO.
There is more than enough variety there to get a range of sounds, and long term your sound design will be benefit a lot more than if you just get a new synth as a result of hitting a roadblock.
Exilium wrote:distorted square
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:53 pm
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
So... what about harmor guys? massive is easier to learn, what about harmor? is it good? which one is more suitable for certain type of music?
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
Get Zebra instead of Massive. Same basic idea but miles ahead in terms of flexibility. It would also make a good synth to learn on, as it's fairly intuitive.
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
Good post. I recommend Massive and I'm a huge fan of Harmless as well. I wouldn't waste time with 3osx or a couple of those others. Just my personal experience.Crimsonghost wrote:You have to take into consideration that EVERYONE uses massive. So clearly he would want it because everyone else has it. Nothing wrong with that. It's a really great synth that you should have. It's also dead easy to learn and has about a billion youtube tuts on how to make sounds with. It's also easy to get inspiration from even the presets (and 3rd party banks).
So, in effect, buying massive could (arguably) make you a better producer seing as it's hard to not learn how to use it to its potental.
Honestly there nothing wrong with wanting new gear as a noob producer (that's how I ended up worth Maschine). As long as it inspires you to create and/or learn, than its a good investment.
︻╦╤─ Dus†wyrm ─╤╦︻
Soundcloud
"The wobble is there more as a reminder that we are still in Dubstep territory, but right now we are chilling... " - Emm
Soundcloud
"The wobble is there more as a reminder that we are still in Dubstep territory, but right now we are chilling... " - Emm
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
Grab some demos and try a few out
Youll find some you like and some you dont
Its that simple!
Youll find some you like and some you dont
Its that simple!
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
mromgwtf wrote:Everything but no 3xosc, please. It has aliasing problems. When you play a higher note on it, it tries to synthesize harmonics that are higher than the sampling rate - and the digital-to-analog converter interprets them as subharmonics. Horrible synth. Well, actually it wouldn't be horrible if it didn't have that problem. But that is what makes it horrible.wub wrote:Buying one of those synths won't automatically mean you won't suck any more. Learn the synths that came with FLStudio (3xOSC, TS404, Toxic Biohazard, Morpheus, Poizone) inside out before you buy another one, IMO.
There is more than enough variety there to get a range of sounds, and long term your sound design will be benefit a lot more than if you just get a new synth as a result of hitting a roadblock.
you do realise everything gets anti-aliased upon rendering? and 90% of synths do this anyway, play a sub note with massive and boost the high end if you dont believe me.
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
i find it hard to believe that a stock synth in a modern daw wouldn't have an anti-aliasing filter built in
WolfCryOfficial wrote:Have fun on your musical campaign to hell.
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
I remember seeing a comparison between soft samplers that had quite a bit of aliasing when re-pitching. I agree it'd be dumb as fuck to not do internal AA on a synth. The anti-aliasing done by convertors or rendering afterwards doesn't make a difference if the aliased frequencies are already folded back into the audible spectrum.
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
the thing with 3xosc is, unlike other synths, everything is done via the host (FL itself)
so maybe thats why it has more aliasing than other synths.
so maybe thats why it has more aliasing than other synths.
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:53 pm
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
Thank you for the replies, but I want to know, Harmor and massive, which one does better in bass? in dubstep production? which one of them is better in certain genre?
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
Neither is better, they're different but can both be used for dubstep.Donaldbeebi wrote:Thank you for the replies, but I want to know, Harmor and massive, which one does better in bass? in dubstep production? which one of them is better in certain genre?
Harmor has the nice ability to resample stuff (check out SeamlessR's tutorials for an intro to this) but I personally found it had a much steeper learning curve, to me Massive is more intuitve and I was able to make the sounds I wanted quicker - I put a lot of that down to the GUI and the way you can link paramaters using drag/drop. Massive also has the wide variety of wavetables you can mess around with.
By the sounds of your posts you probably want to make some bro/tearout basses... if you pick Massive you'll be able to achieve these but as a beginner your sounds will probably end up sounding like every other person who uses Massive for bro bass, but as you progress it's possible to develop sounds to become more original. With Harmor imo you'll be able to come up with more original sounds from the get-go (especially if you start messing with the resampling engine), however it may take you a while to get something good out of the synth rather than just squelchy distorted mush.
In terms of learning your DAW's synths vs. purchasing something new, I'd say go for it. Something like Massive offers different possibilities and a different style of workflow to FL's native synths. That's not to say FL's synths are bad, but it's always good to expand your sound palette, in the same way very few people stick with the samples that come with your DAW.
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
Seriously. Zebra is like Massive on steroids minus the shrunken balls. Incredibly powerful and flexible but also suited to a beginner thanks to it's intuitive adaptable interface.SunkLo wrote:Get Zebra instead of Massive.
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:53 pm
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
Thank you for the replies guys, I decided, and I bought harmor
, this synth is difficult to use but looks like it has a tons of potiential, ty!

Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
I don't necessarily disagree with the overall idea of this post, but the reasoning is FUCKED. Massive is SO easy to use and learn. Still is my go to synth when I want to make a sound as I'm working. I do sound design sessions and just use whatever strikes me, record that stuff. All good. But if I'm in a track and I need a sound, BOOM massive. Just so easy to get what you want, and a little more. Easy to learn, easy to use. Fast. There are downsides. I think the filters are sucko, and the envelope does shit I don't want, and doesn't do shit I do want. Lfo's are cool, but a little inflexible. There are other synths that do envelopes and lfo's much better. But the oscs sound good, and routing/wiring up the synth is a breeze.SunkLo wrote:Get Zebra instead of Massive. Same basic idea but miles ahead in terms of flexibility. It would also make a good synth to learn on, as it's fairly intuitive.
Zebra sounds great, but it is cryptic, hidden shit all over the place. Steeper learning curve, especially if you are just learning subtractive synthesis. I don't recall, but does the innit patch even have an oscillator loaded?
Anyway, I think massive is gonna go 2.0, cause they gave massive away with maschine 2.0 They also gave away prisim in the same deal, and then just released prisim 1.5 for paid upgrade. Now the third time I've bought massive.

- Crimsonghost
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 6:59 am
- Location: Belly of the beastmode
Re: Harmor or Massive or Harmless?
Gotta remember, they gave away massive with 1.8 over a year ago. I think if it was gonna go massive 2 it would have done it by now (maybe end of year, but I doubt it). It's still a massive cash cow for NI ( pun intended) and one of the best synths out there. I think they have too much focus on maschine to put out a new synth right now.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests