The plural of Lego is....

two oh one · Post by **two oh one** » Thu Sep 20, 2007 9:28 pm

It's LEGO, you bunch of silly cocks, etc, etc.

misk · Post by **misk** » Thu Sep 20, 2007 9:48 pm

incyde · Post by **incyde** » Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:46 pm

GODDAMMIT ITS LEGOS HAVENT U EVER BEEN TO LEGOLAND!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?

shonky · Post by **shonky** » Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:51 pm

incyde wrote:GODDAMMIT ITS LEGOS HAVENT U EVER BEEN TO LEGOLAND!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?

YOU KNOW NOTHING

slim · Post by **slim** » Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:39 pm

Misk wrote:

Hahaha that is dark.

Dark like black lego

In the fucking plural

two oh one · Post by **two oh one** » Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:59 pm

incyde wrote:GODDAMMIT ITS LEGOS HAVENT U EVER BEEN TO LEGOLAND!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?

Yes. And it's called LEGOLAND, not LEGOSLAND, yeah?

drum syndicate · Post by **drum syndicate** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:42 am

i hope that cow sits on your head

misk · Post by **misk** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:55 am

TAKEN FROM WIKIPEDIA:

"LEGO is officially written in all uppercase letters. The company asserts that to protect its brand name, the word Lego must always be used as an adjective, as in "LEGO set", "LEGO products", "LEGO universe", and so forth. Nevertheless, such corporate admonitions are frequently ignored and the word Lego is commonly used not only as a noun to refer to Lego bricks, but also as a generic term referring to any kind of interlocking toy brick."

case closed.

chu · Post by **chu** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:59 am

Wheres the extra 1%?

69% right (LEGO)
30% wrong (LEGOS)

Also from wiki:

On average, everyone in the world has 62 LEGO bricks each

two oh one · Post by **two oh one** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:25 am

...and not LEGOS.

Straight from the mouth of Jimpy, the Lego God.

classagraphics · Post by **classagraphics** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:33 am

i'm gonna continue to refer to them as "legos" with the added intention now to tarnish the name of LEGO and disassociate their corporate name from the toy in reference.

*grand* · Post by ***grand*** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:10 am

classagraphics wrote:i'm gonna continue to refer to them as "legos" with the added intention now to tarnish the name of LEGO and disassociate their corporate name from the toy in reference.

still bitter after our talk it seems.... the proff is now on the forum, out to all the haters. Your time!

drum syndicate · Post by **drum syndicate** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:34 am

It's funny how the lego folk in this thread keep posting the same thing over and over and over again about the company's wishes of how it's to be refered to, but at the same time completely discrediting themselves as you state that you call it simply lego, not lego bricks or toys.

Funny way to prove yourself wrong hahaha

*grand* · Post by ***grand*** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:44 am

man shut his mouth !

incyde · Post by **incyde** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:08 pm

OK so maybe they WANT you to address their pieces of plastic as LEGO in order to preserve their brand name, but that doesn't override the rules of the english language.

would you ever say to someone, "please pass me some lego"?

I WOULDNT

SHUT UP

forensix (mcr) · Post by **forensix (mcr)** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:14 pm

incyde wrote:OK so maybe they WANT you to address their pieces of plastic as LEGO in order to preserve their brand name, but that doesn't override the rules of the english language.

would you ever say to someone, "please pass me some lego"?

I WOULDNT

SHUT UP

I WOULD

BURN IN HELL shitface

perkalerk215 · Post by **perkalerk215** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:17 pm

incyde wrote:OK so maybe they WANT you to address their pieces of plastic as LEGO in order to preserve their brand name, but that doesn't override the rules of the english language.

would you ever say to someone, "please pass me some lego"?

I WOULDNT

SHUT UP

they wont listen. been tryin to tell them that. the same as "want to go play lego?" or "go pick up your lego".

relaks · Post by **relaks** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:38 pm

I will kill anyone that says "LEGO® bricks" or any other mishmash garbage

try me

shonky · Post by **shonky** » Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:38 pm

incyde wrote:OK so maybe they WANT you to address their pieces of plastic as LEGO in order to preserve their brand name, but that doesn't override the rules of the english language.

Not all plurals end with "s" though. And we should fucking know being english and all that me old mucker

The plural of Lego is....

The plural of Lego is....

Who is online