The private school vs comprehensive debate

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Riddles
Posts: 4819
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:44 am
Location: Brighton

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by Riddles » Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:18 am

garethom wrote:I turned down going to a King Edwards school because all my mates were going to one of the local comprehensives, so I went there and I've barely stabbed anyone for weeks.
big ups for overcoming adversity fam
Image
soronery wrote:Too easy to sit behind a keyboard with a playlist of dubstep tunes on, arguing about the defintion of a word in relation to a sound.
All that melts away when the lights are down and the bass is up.

User avatar
Electric_Head
Posts: 16958
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
Location: South of Africa
Contact:

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by Electric_Head » Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:21 am

Here it's all specific to the town and area you live in.
My son is going to a public high school which is rated as one of the top schools in the country.
Some private schools in Joburg for example have a bad name for being high cost but very little effort from the teachers.
Essentially a half-way house for rich kids.
Image ImageImage Image
Image

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:53 am

magma wrote: Of course, there are plenty of examples of the success from comprehensives - one of my oldest friends is a doctor for Médecins Sans Frontières - but if I compare their old friendship groups to mine it's pretty obvious which ones are doing better on average. It's sad and incredibly disappointing, but unfortunately, it's also true.
And that inequality will always exist until we remove the wealth driven multi-tier education system and raise the standards of state education, then no one will have an excuse for sending their child to a 'better' paid school and those that excel will encourage the rest of the kids to put more of an effort in. Then we can crush this argument that these kids from wealthy backgrounds are smarter when in fact they are just groomed harder, plus most have the social skills of a brick and a very narrow view of the world around them.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

Riddles
Posts: 4819
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:44 am
Location: Brighton

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by Riddles » Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:03 am

Pedro Sánchez wrote:
magma wrote: Of course, there are plenty of examples of the success from comprehensives - one of my oldest friends is a doctor for Médecins Sans Frontières - but if I compare their old friendship groups to mine it's pretty obvious which ones are doing better on average. It's sad and incredibly disappointing, but unfortunately, it's also true.
And that inequality will always exist until we remove the wealth driven multi-tier education system and raise the standards of state education, then no one will have an excuse for sending their child to a 'better' paid school and those that excel will encourage the rest of the kids to put more of an effort in. Then we can crush this argument that these kids from wealthy backgrounds are smarter when in fact they are just groomed harder, plus most have the social skills of a brick and a very narrow view of the world around them.
The last bit of your comment is stupid, saying people who go to private schools have poor social skills and have a narrow view of the world is a pointless generalisation. You can turn your argument on it's head and say people who go to poor state schools are socially inept because they use a lot of slang etc. You can say they have a narrow view of the world around them because they don't read anything but the sun and don't watch the news.
These are fucking stupid generalisations that shouldn't be made because you have a prejudice against a social class.
Image
soronery wrote:Too easy to sit behind a keyboard with a playlist of dubstep tunes on, arguing about the defintion of a word in relation to a sound.
All that melts away when the lights are down and the bass is up.

User avatar
DJoe
Posts: 2116
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:20 pm
Location: London N4 / Manchester M20

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by DJoe » Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:09 am

southstar wrote:went to normal primary school and then grammer secondary, cos I passed the smart kids exam like
same coincidentally james blake went to my school and k-lone
https://www.mixcloud.com/joseph-jackson/spring-mix-2015/
Think you're big boy cos you got a beard
Bullets will make your face look weird

User avatar
m8son666
moist
Posts: 6580
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: MODERATOR
Contact:

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by m8son666 » Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:12 am

i went to a normal school and i am a genius so they are probs better
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Fri Jan 17, 2014 12:34 pm

Riddles wrote:
Pedro Sánchez wrote:
magma wrote: The last bit of your comment is stupid, saying people who go to private schools have poor social skills and have a narrow view of the world is a pointless generalisation. You can turn your argument on it's head and say people who go to poor state schools are socially inept because they use a lot of slang etc. You can say they have a narrow view of the world around them because they don't read anything but the sun and don't watch the news.
These are fucking stupid generalisations that shouldn't be made because you have a prejudice against a social class.
Only those in state education are more likely to be exposed to more ethnic cultures, slang being used is progressive and creative, often a byproduct of the multicultural environment not a desire to maintain traditionalism for the sake of it, state schools also educate classes upto upper-middleclass in most cases so I don't know why you brought that into it, have you ever seen the syllabus of a top private school, if you are telling me that is not a narrow view of the world then you are having a laugh, they still teach colonialism as something to be championed for fuck sake. My point about them being socially poor may be a sweeping generalisation but I stand by it, they live in bubbles.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by magma » Fri Jan 17, 2014 12:44 pm

Pedro Sánchez wrote:Only those in state education are more likely to be exposed to more ethnic cultures, slang being used is progressive and creative, often a byproduct of the multicultural environment not a desire to maintain traditionalism for the sake of it, state schools also educate classes upto upper-middleclass in most cases so I don't know why you brought that into it, have you ever seen the syllabus of a top private school, if you are telling me that is not a narrow view of the world then you are having a laugh, they still teach colonialism as something to be championed for fuck sake. My point about them being socially poor may be a sweeping generalisation but I stand by it, they live in bubbles.
Have you actually got any experience of people that went to private schools or are you deriving your entire argument from a New Statesman blog?

I went to a comprehensive in a rural, farming district of Somerset. You don't know the meaning of the word "narrow" until you've met some of these farmer's sons and provincial wasters. My ex from the posh school, who'd lived for 3 years in Singapore, speaks 3 languages and sang in Cathedrals all across Europe had ever so slightly more cultural awareness. There was ONE black person in my year at school... the closest I got to "ethnic cultures" was running into Chinese kids from the local private school at the newsagent.

There are shocking examples from all arenas, but you appear to have a chip the size of the communist manifesto eating away at your shoulder.
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.

Riddles
Posts: 4819
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:44 am
Location: Brighton

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by Riddles » Fri Jan 17, 2014 12:54 pm

Pedro Sánchez wrote:
Riddles wrote:
Pedro Sánchez wrote:
magma wrote: The last bit of your comment is stupid, saying people who go to private schools have poor social skills and have a narrow view of the world is a pointless generalisation. You can turn your argument on it's head and say people who go to poor state schools are socially inept because they use a lot of slang etc. You can say they have a narrow view of the world around them because they don't read anything but the sun and don't watch the news.
These are fucking stupid generalisations that shouldn't be made because you have a prejudice against a social class.
Only those in state education are more likely to be exposed to more ethnic cultures, slang being used is progressive and creative, often a byproduct of the multicultural environment not a desire to maintain traditionalism for the sake of it, state schools also educate classes upto upper-middleclass in most cases so I don't know why you brought that into it, have you ever seen the syllabus of a top private school, if you are telling me that is not a narrow view of the world then you are having a laugh, they still teach colonialism as something to be championed for fuck sake. My point about them being socially poor may be a sweeping generalisation but I stand by it, they live in bubbles.
The majority of private schools cater to upper middle class people, not the social elite. To tar them all with the same brush is pointless. You're making presumptions on all private schools based on what you've seen of Eton it seems.

And what Magma said, he's better at words than me.
Image
soronery wrote:Too easy to sit behind a keyboard with a playlist of dubstep tunes on, arguing about the defintion of a word in relation to a sound.
All that melts away when the lights are down and the bass is up.

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by wub » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:03 pm

Riddles wrote:And what Magma said, he's better at words than me.
Probably because he went to a better school.

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:10 pm

magma wrote:
Pedro Sánchez wrote:Only those in state education are more likely to be exposed to more ethnic cultures, slang being used is progressive and creative, often a byproduct of the multicultural environment not a desire to maintain traditionalism for the sake of it, state schools also educate classes upto upper-middleclass in most cases so I don't know why you brought that into it, have you ever seen the syllabus of a top private school, if you are telling me that is not a narrow view of the world then you are having a laugh, they still teach colonialism as something to be championed for fuck sake. My point about them being socially poor may be a sweeping generalisation but I stand by it, they live in bubbles.
Have you actually got any experience of people that went to private schools or are you deriving your entire argument from a New Statesman blog?

I went to a comprehensive in a rural, farming district of Somerset. You don't know the meaning of the word "narrow" until you've met some of these farmer's sons. My ex from the posh school, who'd lived for 3 years in Singapore, speaks 3 languages and sang in Cathedrals all across Europe had ever so slightly more cultural awareness.

There are shocking examples from all arenas, but you appear to have a chip the size of the communist manifesto eating away at your shoulder.
I am speaking from my own experience, yes, one of my good mates growing up went to the top private school here in Manchester, William Hulme, so no, I'm not basing it of blind generalizations. I also don't have a chip on my shoulder and what the communist manifesto remark has got to do with wanting an equal playing field every kids education is lost on me mate.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

User avatar
Samuel_L_Damnson
Posts: 3485
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:53 pm
Location: YORKSHIRE!!!!!!!!!!

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by Samuel_L_Damnson » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:11 pm

nah its all about going to pilot school. fuck actual school. I want all of my kids to fly high in the planes all day
Soundcloud
Collaborative project with kai li:
http://soundcloud.com/genrli

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:19 pm

magma wrote:
Pedro Sánchez wrote:I went to a comprehensive in a rural, farming district of Somerset. You don't know the meaning of the word "narrow" until you've met some of these farmer's sons and provincial wasters. My ex from the posh school, who'd lived for 3 years in Singapore, speaks 3 languages and sang in Cathedrals all across Europe had ever so slightly more cultural awareness. There was ONE black person in my year at school... the closest I got to "ethnic cultures" was running into Chinese kids from the local private school at the newsagent.
You're using one extreme to compare another.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by magma » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:22 pm

Pedro Sánchez wrote:what the communist manifesto remark has got to do with wanting an equal playing field every kids education is lost on me mate.
It doesn't have anything to do with that, it has everything to do with you clearly making huge assumptions about people you don't know very much about. You're currently trying to frame your argument based on a "top private school" which is probably not terribly representative of private schools all round the country. Out of all the people I've known that have attended private schools (my brothers, my longest-serving girlfriend, my best friend) none of them would identify as Conservatives. All of them are either from ethnic minorities themselves or have mixed friendship groups.

Incidentally, the only actual communist I know, who happens to be my best friend, went to Red Maids All Girls school in Bristol. She's more cultured, more intelligent and more progressive than you. Deal with it.
Last edited by magma on Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by magma » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:23 pm

Pedro Sánchez wrote:
magma wrote:
Pedro Sánchez wrote:I went to a comprehensive in a rural, farming district of Somerset. You don't know the meaning of the word "narrow" until you've met some of these farmer's sons and provincial wasters. My ex from the posh school, who'd lived for 3 years in Singapore, speaks 3 languages and sang in Cathedrals all across Europe had ever so slightly more cultural awareness. There was ONE black person in my year at school... the closest I got to "ethnic cultures" was running into Chinese kids from the local private school at the newsagent.
You're using one extreme to compare another.
I'm really not. I'm using my life. My upbringing was pretty typical.
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:41 pm

magma wrote:
Pedro Sánchez wrote:Incidentally, the only actual communist I know, who happens to be my best friend, went to Red Maids All Girls school in Bristol. She's more cultured, more intelligent and more progressive than you. Deal with it.
Good for her and her actual communist self. I dealt with it.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

leyenda
Posts: 2243
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:08 pm

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by leyenda » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:49 pm

djredi2step wrote:
southstar wrote:went to normal primary school and then grammer secondary, cos I passed the smart kids exam like
same coincidentally james blake went to my school and k-lone
same with me too. I'd send my kid to a grammer assuming they passed the entrance test
Shum wrote:
Nevalo wrote:not much todo at work today.... and once ive finished, ITS THE FUCKIN LONG WEEKEND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah big up Jesus for dying for our sins and netting us a public holiday in the process.

Also, hot cross buns.

particle-jim
Posts: 10747
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Hermosillo, Mexico via South London
Contact:

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by particle-jim » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:51 pm

djredi2step wrote:
southstar wrote:went to normal primary school and then grammer secondary, cos I passed the smart kids exam like
same coincidentally james blake went to my school and k-lone
David Bowie and Peter Frampton went to my school
imami wrote:i put secret donks in all my tunes, just low enough so you can't hear them
http://www.soundcloud.com/particle
http://www.mixcloud.com/particlejim

User avatar
DJoe
Posts: 2116
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:20 pm
Location: London N4 / Manchester M20

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by DJoe » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:52 pm

lol you probably win bowie is a g
https://www.mixcloud.com/joseph-jackson/spring-mix-2015/
Think you're big boy cos you got a beard
Bullets will make your face look weird

User avatar
DJoe
Posts: 2116
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:20 pm
Location: London N4 / Manchester M20

Re: The private school vs comprehensive debate

Post by DJoe » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:53 pm

leyenda303 wrote:
djredi2step wrote:
southstar wrote:went to normal primary school and then grammer secondary, cos I passed the smart kids exam like
same coincidentally james blake went to my school and k-lone
same with me too. I'd send my kid to a grammer assuming they passed the entrance test
best of both worlds to some extent, but you still get loads of rich kids with tutors and stuff
https://www.mixcloud.com/joseph-jackson/spring-mix-2015/
Think you're big boy cos you got a beard
Bullets will make your face look weird

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests