The Fedora/Cringe thread

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
User avatar
m8son666
moist
Posts: 6580
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: MODERATOR
Contact:

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by m8son666 » Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:15 pm

Pedro Sánchez wrote:
m8son wrote::lol: he has quite a comprehensive 'about me' section
MICHAEL URBINA wrote:Welcome to my blog! I’m a Sociology and Women’s and Gender Studies Double Major. I will be using this blog to write about race/ethnicity, gender, masculinity, feminism, and men in feminism. My goal is to raise awareness, connect you (the reader) with some badass articles and videos, and provide resources for men interested in exploring
Image
:cornlol:
i only saw this one http://michaelurbina.com/about-me/
Hello everyone! My name is Michael Urbina.
Image
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.

Riddles
Posts: 4819
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:44 am
Location: Brighton

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by Riddles » Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:17 pm

fuck the list, read the comments hahahahaha
Image
soronery wrote:Too easy to sit behind a keyboard with a playlist of dubstep tunes on, arguing about the defintion of a word in relation to a sound.
All that melts away when the lights are down and the bass is up.

User avatar
m8son666
moist
Posts: 6580
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: MODERATOR
Contact:

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by m8son666 » Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:19 pm

Image





Image











Image























Image
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by wub » Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:20 pm

His Facebook page is pretty interesting as well;

https://www.facebook.com/michaelanthonyurbina

wolf89
Posts: 10287
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:18 pm

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by wolf89 » Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:22 pm

See I know there's an awful lot of things there to talk about but I'm just gonna say I'm totally stumped by this one
Be conscious of where your eyes wander as a woman walks by. Change that behavior.

So you're not allowed to look at an attractive woman at all ever because it's harassment? I mean I understand that having a massive unsubtle perv on someone is going to make someone uncomfortable but this isn't really saying that. So women don't look at men they find attractive? What about lesbians having a cheeky ogle? Is that still sexist? Are guys allowed to check out other guys if they're inclined to do so? I don't see how this is an issue about feminism. It's just about drawing the line between glancing at someone you like the look of vs an offensive obvious perving that makes someone uncomfortable. I mean I do realize what thread we're in can anyone still explain this point?

Riddles
Posts: 4819
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:44 am
Location: Brighton

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by Riddles » Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:32 pm

wolf89 wrote:See I know there's an awful lot of things there to talk about but I'm just gonna say I'm totally stumped by this one
Be conscious of where your eyes wander as a woman walks by. Change that behavior.

So you're not allowed to look at an attractive woman at all ever because it's harassment? I mean I understand that having a massive unsubtle perv on someone is going to make someone uncomfortable but this isn't really saying that. So women don't look at men they find attractive? What about lesbians having a cheeky ogle? Is that still sexist? Are guys allowed to check out other guys if they're inclined to do so? I don't see how this is an issue about feminism. It's just about drawing the line between glancing at someone you like the look of vs an offensive obvious perving that makes someone uncomfortable. I mean I do realize what thread we're in can anyone still explain this point?
wolf, get your male privilege in check please.
Image
soronery wrote:Too easy to sit behind a keyboard with a playlist of dubstep tunes on, arguing about the defintion of a word in relation to a sound.
All that melts away when the lights are down and the bass is up.

User avatar
Lye_Form
Posts: 3857
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:43 pm
Location: Lundun
Contact:

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by Lye_Form » Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:37 pm

m8son wrote: Image
Image
Life Force Sound | Soundcloud | Facebook
Wolf89 wrote:I'm bit a hipster is the point
wub wrote:Bob Dylan is not Grime.

User avatar
hubb
Posts: 8823
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:24 pm
Location: ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by hubb » Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:09 pm

Yes, immaturity.

Also it's bit like folk believing a photograph will steal your soul
OGLemon wrote:cowabunga dude

https://soundcloud.com/qloo/cowabunga-music-of-moby
fragments wrote:SWEEEEEEEEE!

https://soundcloud.com/qloo/cowabunga-t ... o-sweeeeee
Johnlenham wrote:evil euroland

User avatar
RKM
Posts: 4742
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 3:57 am

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by RKM » Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:35 pm

Riddles wrote:
wolf89 wrote:See I know there's an awful lot of things there to talk about but I'm just gonna say I'm totally stumped by this one
Be conscious of where your eyes wander as a woman walks by. Change that behavior.

So you're not allowed to look at an attractive woman at all ever because it's harassment? I mean I understand that having a massive unsubtle perv on someone is going to make someone uncomfortable but this isn't really saying that. So women don't look at men they find attractive? What about lesbians having a cheeky ogle? Is that still sexist? Are guys allowed to check out other guys if they're inclined to do so? I don't see how this is an issue about feminism. It's just about drawing the line between glancing at someone you like the look of vs an offensive obvious perving that makes someone uncomfortable. I mean I do realize what thread we're in can anyone still explain this point?
wolf, get your male privilege in check please.
innit typical cis behaviour
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage

User avatar
nobody
Posts: 3003
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:20 am
Location: falafel

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by nobody » Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:54 pm

om_unit wrote: wtf is juke?

User avatar
bennyfroobs
Posts: 4532
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:52 am
Location: the rainy north

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by bennyfroobs » Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:58 pm

garethom wrote:re: that list Wub posted.
Recognize your privileges, especially your male privilege (and white privilege if applicable).
I understand what it is (or allegedly is, whatever), but what am I meant to do with that knowledge?
allegedly s: ??

white privilege is very very apparent, america for example

i guess its not so huge in the uk but its still pretty obvious
Image
TopManLurka wrote:FTR, requirements for being a 'head':

-you have to be youngsta
-you must have been in that infamous room of ten people.
-a DMZ release is preferable but not necessary.
-please note that being youngsta is mandatory.

User avatar
bennyfroobs
Posts: 4532
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:52 am
Location: the rainy north

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by bennyfroobs » Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:01 pm

cant find the original 101 men allies to women article thing the link doesnt work ))))))))))=-:
Image
TopManLurka wrote:FTR, requirements for being a 'head':

-you have to be youngsta
-you must have been in that infamous room of ten people.
-a DMZ release is preferable but not necessary.
-please note that being youngsta is mandatory.

User avatar
bennyfroobs
Posts: 4532
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:52 am
Location: the rainy north

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by bennyfroobs » Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:07 pm

found it

its pretty cringe tbh

im seeing a lot of "take the behaviour dictated by ur natural instincts and do the complete opposite"

im all for feminism but some off this stuff is just butt-gash

97. Appearances should never matter
OH COME ON!!! THATS JUS STUPID!!!
Image
TopManLurka wrote:FTR, requirements for being a 'head':

-you have to be youngsta
-you must have been in that infamous room of ten people.
-a DMZ release is preferable but not necessary.
-please note that being youngsta is mandatory.

User avatar
Harkat
Posts: 6375
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:05 am
Location: GLASGOW

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by Harkat » Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:28 pm

lol I got to the one where it told you to look down and cross the street in case of seeing a female
RKM wrote: when bae hands u the aux mixtape and your squad blunted 9/11 aye lmao

rickyarbino
Posts: 4508
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Eternity

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by rickyarbino » Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:07 am

wolf89 wrote:See I know there's an awful lot of things there to talk about but I'm just gonna say I'm totally stumped by this one
Be conscious of where your eyes wander as a woman walks by. Change that behavior.

So you're not allowed to look at an attractive woman at all ever because it's harassment? I mean I understand that having a massive unsubtle perv on someone is going to make someone uncomfortable but this isn't really saying that. So women don't look at men they find attractive? What about lesbians having a cheeky ogle? Is that still sexist? Are guys allowed to check out other guys if they're inclined to do so? I don't see how this is an issue about feminism. It's just about drawing the line between glancing at someone you like the look of vs an offensive obvious perving that makes someone uncomfortable. I mean I do realize what thread we're in can anyone still explain this point?
Is that no the entire practicability of feminism though?
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.

titchbit
Posts: 3536
Joined: Sat May 11, 2013 8:16 pm
Location: levitating on bass weight

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by titchbit » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:29 am

nothing

jrkhnds
Posts: 4180
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:35 am
Location: Zurich / Basel

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by jrkhnds » Tue Apr 01, 2014 3:21 am

wolf89 wrote: So you're not allowed to look at an attractive woman at all ever because it's harassment? I mean I understand that having a massive unsubtle perv on someone is going to make someone uncomfortable but this isn't really saying that. So women don't look at men they find attractive? What about lesbians having a cheeky ogle? Is that still sexist? Are guys allowed to check out other guys if they're inclined to do so? I don't see how this is an issue about feminism. It's just about drawing the line between glancing at someone you like the look of vs an offensive obvious perving that makes someone uncomfortable. I mean I do realize what thread we're in can anyone still explain this point?
there's a strong chance I got it all wrong, but I think that is kinda their point: there are a couple of guys around who can't grasp the concept of mutual respect, and as it happens around 90% of them are heterosexual so they will be eyeballin' and disrespectin' women on a daily basis. and I wouldn't say they're wrong in stating women are far less likely to sexually harass men with their looks, purely because men aren't tought to beware of female approaches (here lies the main problem with modern feminism imho: trying to rid mankind of its last 6000 years of socio-cultural development is a bit naive).

basically, feminist agenda is (or was, some time ago) about educating poorly educated #lads.
AxeD wrote:I dunno, there's some thoroughly unemployed people on this forum.
Soundcloud

User avatar
garethom
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:55 pm
Location: Birmz
Contact:

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by garethom » Tue Apr 01, 2014 7:17 am

bennyfroobs wrote:
garethom wrote:re: that list Wub posted.
Recognize your privileges, especially your male privilege (and white privilege if applicable).
I understand what it is (or allegedly is, whatever), but what am I meant to do with that knowledge?
allegedly s: ??

white privilege is very very apparent, america for example

i guess its not so huge in the uk but its still pretty obvious
Just commenting about it on a personal level bro and didn't wanna get into a debate about whether or not it exists when it wasn't important to the point I was making. :t:

Anyway, according to the internet, this is Deadmau5' car...

Image

User avatar
m8son666
moist
Posts: 6580
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: MODERATOR
Contact:

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by m8son666 » Tue Apr 01, 2014 7:21 am

fuck white privilege
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.

jrkhnds
Posts: 4180
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:35 am
Location: Zurich / Basel

Re: The Fedora/Cringe thread

Post by jrkhnds » Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:26 am

garethom wrote: Anyway, according to the internet, this is Deadmau5' car...

Image
if I were to spend deadmou5-$$$ I'd buy stuff a lot stupider than that though.
AxeD wrote:I dunno, there's some thoroughly unemployed people on this forum.
Soundcloud

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests