hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click
HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
Jizz
- Posts: 3470
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:43 pm
- Location: London
Post
by Jizz » Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:23 pm
so you know how the original Yamaha NS10 was designed as a Hi Fi, but then ended up being a studio monitor... is there an equivalent for that today?
because I don't want to get pristine monitors that are all very clear and precise or whatever, I'd like something that allows a bit of booming colour while at the same time delivers a response that's flatter than most average Hi Fi's. something in between the two
preferrably Active Monitors
Last edited by
Jizz on Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
_ronzlo_
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:29 pm
Post
by _ronzlo_ » Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:35 pm
Roland MA-8's. I don't think they make 'em anymore but you can get them on ebay for like $30 I think. Fits the bill for what you're after.
The nice thing about them is that you can turn the volume down really low but boost the bass so you still hear all the subs and stuff yet it's not cranked - you can barely hear it in the next room.
nowaysj wrote: ...But the chick's panties that you drop with a keytar, marry that B.
-
Jizz
- Posts: 3470
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:43 pm
- Location: London
Post
by Jizz » Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:52 pm

are those things even monitors though, they look like one of those Logitech speakers man
and I just googled them, seems really hard to get hold of nowadays
-
_ronzlo_
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:29 pm
Post
by _ronzlo_ » Wed Aug 06, 2014 10:29 pm

Don't let the size fool you. I've used these to rock a couple houseparties and they could hold their own easily. Plus the zeroed response is remarkably flat, maybe a tiny bit on the boomy side.
nowaysj wrote: ...But the chick's panties that you drop with a keytar, marry that B.
-
NinjaEdit
- Posts: 1603
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:16 am
- Location: Western Australia
-
Contact:
Post
by NinjaEdit » Wed Aug 06, 2014 10:36 pm
KRKs are hyped in the bass.
Or you get ones with an eq and boost the bass and cut the highs.
-
_ronzlo_
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:29 pm
Post
by _ronzlo_ » Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:28 am
Wow, interesting! The write-up is spot on. They're amazing little beasts - problem mixes that make other speakers clip and crackle come through with none of those speaker artifacts and let you know where the problem is. Like I said, a tad boomy but nothing you can't dial in to your taste with the built in 2 band eq.
nowaysj wrote: ...But the chick's panties that you drop with a keytar, marry that B.
-
fragments
- Posts: 3552
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:24 pm
- Location: NEOhio
-
Contact:
Post
by fragments » Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:25 am
Why not just get HiFi speakers? I mean, I get what you are saying...
You know, I have a pair of 99 USD Numark DJ monitors that I use to listen to music out near the garage, like while I am BBQing. I love checking my mixes on those. I can get the model if you are interested.
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
-
Jizz
- Posts: 3470
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:43 pm
- Location: London
Post
by Jizz » Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:32 am
So roland is actually behringer?
Fragments i actually do have a Sony Hi Fi already, and i'll say its decent. But i'd like something that is more err... monitor-y
Ok ok let me rephrase question. What is a monitor thats a bit shit? Something thats designed for production and is generally flat, but is infamous for being a bit muddy with the lower frequencies?
-
fragments
- Posts: 3552
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:24 pm
- Location: NEOhio
-
Contact:
Post
by fragments » Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:49 am
JizzMan wrote:So roland is actually behringer?
Fragments i actually do have a Sony Hi Fi already, and i'll say its decent. But i'd like something that is more err... monitor-y
Ok ok let me rephrase question. What is a monitor thats a bit shit? Something thats designed for production and is generally flat, but is infamous for being a bit muddy with the lower frequencies?
I know what you mean. I think everyone is right when they say KRK Rokits. They always sound like mid-grade consumer HiFi to me. Perhaps also entry level Mackie.
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
-
cyclopian
- Posts: 1275
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:28 pm
- Location: Oakland, CA
Post
by cyclopian » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:04 am
Yeah the Krk 8s are quite 'boomy' and fairly nice (forgiving) sounding, the low end can fill a small room up nicely too. They tire my ears out pretty quickly though; always get bad ear fatigue when working with my homie that has them in his room.
And to clarify, Roland is not Behringer, or vice versa. Its pretty common for companies to buy products from an unknown-ish company and slap their own label on it though. "OEM" is a huge thing these days; look into it.
-
fragments
- Posts: 3552
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:24 pm
- Location: NEOhio
-
Contact:
Post
by fragments » Thu Aug 07, 2014 5:07 am
andius wrote:Yeah the Krk 8s are quite 'boomy' and fairly nice (forgiving) sounding, the low end can fill a small room up nicely too. They tire my ears out pretty quickly though; always get bad ear fatigue when working with my homie that has them in his room.
And to clarify, Roland is not Behringer, or vice versa. Its pretty common for companies to buy products from an unknown-ish company and slap their own label on it though. "OEM" is a huge thing these days; look into it.
I always found KRK Rokits really fatiguing too. Even when I started at low volume.
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
-
Jizz
- Posts: 3470
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:43 pm
- Location: London
Post
by Jizz » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:00 am
You know what, the Mackie MRK II looks like what I need. It has had sufficient complaints about giving a woofer-y bass, are cheap enough and doesnt look as intrusive as the KRK's. Only problem is with some complaints that the highs are supposedly "too smooth", but I think I could learn how to cope with that
Thanks guys
This brings me to my next question... whats a good soundcard these days, the focusrite still a prime choice?
-
Genevieve
- Posts: 8775
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
- Location: 6_6
Post
by Genevieve » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:52 am
Why this type of "monitor"? Because you're used to mixing on a boomy system?
namsayin
:'0
-
Jizz
- Posts: 3470
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:43 pm
- Location: London
Post
by Jizz » Thu Aug 07, 2014 12:11 pm
yeah tbh I just reaally like the boomy aesthetic of something like the classic NS10 man, and with a lot of beats I maake its something I actively seek to do, just get em boomin, #nahmean
as far as the flatter ones go, Adams would probably be the only ones I'd like to get but I'm really not fussed paying huge amounts for it, when I already genuinely prefer something thats cheaper
plus, yes I am already used to making trax on a boomy Hi Fi... just that this one aint boomin enough

-
Genevieve
- Posts: 8775
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
- Location: 6_6
Post
by Genevieve » Thu Aug 07, 2014 12:45 pm
Wouldn't something that isn't that boomy sound boomier than it is on a system like that and in fact keep you from getting that aesthetic accurately? Something that sounds boomy on your system may not sound that way on a different one.
I'm not trying to be critical of your choice, just curious if that's the best course of action.
namsayin
:'0
-
Jizz
- Posts: 3470
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:43 pm
- Location: London
Post
by Jizz » Thu Aug 07, 2014 12:52 pm
nah that makes sense. It was something I thought about too. that was why initially I was asking for a modern day NS10, because that was something known to be boomy but still gave out mixes that just worked on any system
just a shame that one of those is near impossible to get hold of now...
-
fragments
- Posts: 3552
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:24 pm
- Location: NEOhio
-
Contact:
Post
by fragments » Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:24 pm
I know you want active monitors...but consider the fact that most hifi system seapkers are passive. Seems to me that might matter.
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
-
AxeD
- Posts: 9361
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:10 pm
- Location: Damstarem
Post
by AxeD » Thu Aug 07, 2014 2:12 pm
What size is the room?
Agent 47 wrote:Next time I can think of something, I will.
-
_ronzlo_
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:29 pm
Post
by _ronzlo_ » Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:25 pm
JizzMan wrote:You know what, the Mackie MRK II looks like what I need. It has had sufficient complaints about giving a woofer-y bass, are cheap enough and doesnt look as intrusive as the KRK's. Only problem is with some complaints that the highs are supposedly "too smooth", but I think I could learn how to cope with that
Thanks guys
This brings me to my next question... whats a good soundcard these days, the focusrite still a prime choice?
LOL. Those are/were my main studio monitors. But the low end is way more focused than NS10's, despite what you might've read. Not the best, but... they're pretty decent monitors, esp. for rock type sounds. Not attenuated as well to electronic music but definitely (IMO) not "dirty" enough for what I think you're seeking.
nowaysj wrote: ...But the chick's panties that you drop with a keytar, marry that B.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests