Massive in Dubstep
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: Massive in Dubstep
Massive has its place, and the macro section is useful, but you have to work had to make it not'sound like Massive. I would personally prefer to spend time twisting something like Synth1 or 3xOsc into a sound I want than taking time trying to get Massive away from something I consider to be a distinctive sound.
Re: Massive in Dubstep
You're wasting your time. From their juvenile replies, I can tell that they've not even tried it. It sounds like they don't have a clue as to it's functionality - it's one of the most capable synths on the market by far.rorz9992 wrote:Have you actually spent any time with Massive? It's a genius piece of software. There's plenty of non-brostep artists that use it too, it's good for more than just screeching bass sounds. The interface and intuitiveness of it are really what makes it great, beyond the sounds it can generate.
And comparing it to 3 osc is like comparing a push bike to a Ferrari.
Re: Massive in Dubstep
Yeah because only respectable Dj's/Producers pay for there gear....??Seeerious wrote:Pay for massive.....
Yeah, Good joke that is.
Buy Maschine Studio and get Massive, Kontakt 5 and Reaktor 5.

Re: Massive in Dubstep
Holy shit guys

Anal A$ap....Keep living dat #PLUR life....To attempt to have intercourse with a hornet's nest is a very bad idea.... Swagm8son wrote:yh a bit of extra knob fiddling is ok
Instagram Soundcloud
Re: Massive in Dubstep
You're not fooling anyone, you've made it quite obvious that you'be spent no more than 10 minutes with Massive, if that. Not everyone uses Fruity anyway so a lot of us don't have access to 3xOsc. Not that I would use it anyway (I used to use FL Studio but not now)wub wrote:Massive has its place, and the macro section is useful, but you have to work had to make it not'sound like Massive. I would personally prefer to spend time twisting something like Synth1 or 3xOsc into a sound I want than taking time trying to get Massive away from something I consider to be a distinctive sound.
Re: Massive in Dubstep
Not trying to fool anyone, mate. My post is meant to be taken at face value...no hidden meaningrorz9992 wrote:You're not fooling anyone, you've made it quite obvious that you'be spent no more than 10 minutes with Massive, if that. Not everyone uses Fruity anyway so a lot of us don't have access to 3xOsc. Not that I would use it anyway (I used to use FL Studio but not now)buw wrote:Massive has its place, and the macro section is useful, but you have to work had to make it not'sound like Massive. I would personally prefer to spend time twisting something like Synth1 or 3xOsc into a sound I want than taking time trying to get Massive away from something I consider to be a distinctive sound.

As I stated at the bottom, it comes down to personal preference

Re: Massive in Dubstep
That's my biggest problem with it too, can never get it to sound too "unique"wub wrote:Massive has its place, and the macro section is useful, but you have to work had to make it not'sound like Massive. I would personally prefer to spend time twisting something like Synth1 or 3xOsc into a sound I want than taking time trying to get Massive away from something I consider to be a distinctive sound.
Re: Massive in Dubstep
As far as having to use Massive, that is of course ridiculous. Does it make it easier to get there for many. Yea probably. To me, Massive is kind of like KRK Rokits...it kept popping up in videos so it became really popular.
As for Massive having a particular tonal quality. I think it does. I think most soft synths do. Just like most hardware synths do. I also think most NI synths have a similar tonal quality I don't always like. But, that is just a matter processing the sound a bit after it leaves the synth. Absynth, for example, has always sounded "icy" to me. But I love it and when I don't want that quality I do something about it.
Also...what about FM8? I thought it turned out a lot of brostep sounds relied on that as much as Massive?
As for Massive having a particular tonal quality. I think it does. I think most soft synths do. Just like most hardware synths do. I also think most NI synths have a similar tonal quality I don't always like. But, that is just a matter processing the sound a bit after it leaves the synth. Absynth, for example, has always sounded "icy" to me. But I love it and when I don't want that quality I do something about it.
Also...what about FM8? I thought it turned out a lot of brostep sounds relied on that as much as Massive?
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
Re: Massive in Dubstep
I think to make it in any industry you have spend some amount of money on the tools you use... complaining that you have to buy a few plugins to make sounds is like saying "why can't I become a professional photographer with my disposable camera"... it doesn't make any sense. Now as to why Massive is so popular there are tons of reasons, but you certainly don't need Massive to make good sounds and I bet label owners don't give a shit what synth you used as long as it sounds good.
WolfCryOfficial wrote:Have fun on your musical campaign to hell.
- Samuel_L_Damnson
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:53 pm
- Location: YORKSHIRE!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Massive in Dubstep
if u can do a wob in 3xosc then do a wob in 3xosc. if u can do it massive do it in massive. I love all wobs so dont discriminate u bascists
Re: Massive in Dubstep
While I absolutely think some great music has been made on a mediocre PC with all freeware and shit headphones...yea...music is unfortunately one of those hobbies/professions where quality of tools counts and the truth is that for the most part you get what you pay for. Honestly, if you could make multi-million dollar pop records in your mama's basement with a cracked copy of FL Studio and gaming headset microphone why the hell does *anybody* ...huge record companies...independent artists...spend money on renting/buying expensive, complex equipment and people who know how to use it?Add9 wrote:I think to make it in any industry you have spend some amount of money on the tools you use... complaining that you have to buy a few plugins to make sounds is like saying "why can't I become a professional photographer with my disposable camera"... it doesn't make any sense. Now as to why Massive is so popular there are tons of reasons, but you certainly don't need Massive to make good sounds and I bet label owners don't give a shit what synth you used as long as it sounds good.
FFS you can get Massive for 99 bones every year around the winter holidays. Its inevitable I'll come off as some elitist hardware/software ass clown if I say this...but come on...99 dollars for Massive is hardly worthy of being deemed "investing in your craft".
But I'm also the dumb tnuc who spends an obnoxious amount of money to fart around making only-passable synth music, so don't even listen to me

SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
Re: Massive in Dubstep
OP is one of the most retarded things Ive ever read on here.
Sounds to me like youre just shit at making tunes and want to blame it on something other than yourself.
You think no one got signed before massive was released? What about those using hardware or reason???
Learn the principles behind sound design and youll know how to achieve the sound youre after on any synth
Also lol at using loops
Sounds to me like youre just shit at making tunes and want to blame it on something other than yourself.
You think no one got signed before massive was released? What about those using hardware or reason???
Learn the principles behind sound design and youll know how to achieve the sound youre after on any synth
Also lol at using loops
Re: Massive in Dubstep
There's a new software out there called utorrent...if you don't have it get it...Beare wrote: These days you will never ever get signed to any sort of major label, and probably no minor labels unless your using Massive for your baselines. And sure, you can make some okay shit with freeware, but your seriously wasting your time unless you want to shell out hundreds of dollars for Massive/Sylenth/Etc. It seems to me the only ways to get signed to a dubstep label is to either buy a shit ton of dubstep loops because you can't make them yourself, or spend all your time trying to make halfway decent bass with halfway decent synths and never get anywhere. Literally every single prominent dubstep producer uses Massive. I just watched 5 hours worth of interviews, and allll there people say they use Massive. IDK what the fuck they got started with, but Datsik sure as hell didn't get where he was with TAL Noisemaker and a bunch of BPB plugins.![]()
Lengman
Do you think NI's Massive is worth it's rep?
I'm pretty sure everyone of this forum is familiar with massive, I just want to know if YOU guys actually rate it..
No doubt you can get some great sounds from it, and it proves versatile. Easy interface, user friendly and you can shape a sound in less than 5.
However I do feel I get very bored of the sounds, especially when it come's to reeses, and standard basslines. When I first got massive I was amazed at almost every waveform, thinking of all the possibilities. Now especially after listening to a lot of dubstep, it just sounds the same (especially the vowel growl sound from bend formants), like you'll listen to a producers song and recognise it's massive.
Also I've never been the greatest fan of waveform synthesis. you should know the lower the pitch the less oscillations from a waveform p/s, that's why if you play a wave in the lowest octave it's almost like a slow wobble and massive beeing waveform it emphasizes it so much.
I never really see it as a challenge anymore although I still use it to make a quick lead bass, but I don't want my tracks relying solely on massive, even though with it's versatility you def can.
Modulation wise, it's perfect. Easy to map, map to anything! (almost)
What do you guys think, would you recommend it to someone who's starting to make any sort of electronic music?
Also what other synths would you suggest for dubstep? I found Synthmaster 2, a hybrid synth where it is possible to mix 2 or more types of synthesis into one patch (waveform + additive, and more) it's amazing.
And also Zebra, where you can physically shape your waveforms. these are synths where you can truly shape your own sound with endless possibilities.
In conclusion, massive is great, I think it is everyone's guilty pleasure. But don't let the simplicity (If I may say that) misguide you from other great synths
No doubt you can get some great sounds from it, and it proves versatile. Easy interface, user friendly and you can shape a sound in less than 5.
However I do feel I get very bored of the sounds, especially when it come's to reeses, and standard basslines. When I first got massive I was amazed at almost every waveform, thinking of all the possibilities. Now especially after listening to a lot of dubstep, it just sounds the same (especially the vowel growl sound from bend formants), like you'll listen to a producers song and recognise it's massive.
Also I've never been the greatest fan of waveform synthesis. you should know the lower the pitch the less oscillations from a waveform p/s, that's why if you play a wave in the lowest octave it's almost like a slow wobble and massive beeing waveform it emphasizes it so much.
I never really see it as a challenge anymore although I still use it to make a quick lead bass, but I don't want my tracks relying solely on massive, even though with it's versatility you def can.
Modulation wise, it's perfect. Easy to map, map to anything! (almost)
What do you guys think, would you recommend it to someone who's starting to make any sort of electronic music?
Also what other synths would you suggest for dubstep? I found Synthmaster 2, a hybrid synth where it is possible to mix 2 or more types of synthesis into one patch (waveform + additive, and more) it's amazing.
And also Zebra, where you can physically shape your waveforms. these are synths where you can truly shape your own sound with endless possibilities.
In conclusion, massive is great, I think it is everyone's guilty pleasure. But don't let the simplicity (If I may say that) misguide you from other great synths
Re: Do you think NI's Massive is worth it's rep?
Alchemy and Absynth both have a lot more to offer. Personally I think Absynth also has that NI tone to it. I think Alchemy is easier to use than Absynth though. Each have features the others don't.
I got Massive with Maschine 2 upgrade. Basically Massive's only benefit is a quicker workflow IMO. I think it is nice for beginners especially because it is more or less a single panel and everything is so straight forward. But if you are looking for something to keep you busy in sound design maybe that Synthmaster or Absynth or Alchemy both...Ab and Al let you combine synthesis types into a single patch, are samplers and do granular.
Personally I like Alchemy the most out of all the VST synths I've owned/tried.
I got Massive with Maschine 2 upgrade. Basically Massive's only benefit is a quicker workflow IMO. I think it is nice for beginners especially because it is more or less a single panel and everything is so straight forward. But if you are looking for something to keep you busy in sound design maybe that Synthmaster or Absynth or Alchemy both...Ab and Al let you combine synthesis types into a single patch, are samplers and do granular.
Personally I like Alchemy the most out of all the VST synths I've owned/tried.
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
Re: Do you think NI's Massive is worth it's rep?
Massive is a fantastic workhorse.
Screw the rep, and the people that use it to make shitty dubstep basslines.
Screw the rep, and the people that use it to make shitty dubstep basslines.
2 keyboards 1 computer
Sure_Fire wrote:By the way does anyone have the stems to make it bun dem? Missed the beatport comp and would very much like the ego booster of saying I remixed Skrillex.
Re: Do you think NI's Massive is worth it's rep?
Yeah, massive is a good synth. If you want to make generic tripe with it, you can. Otherwise there is a lot that it can do.
Will say, its filters are not the best.
Will say, its filters are not the best.
Re: Do you think NI's Massive is worth it's rep?
This is really my biggest bitch with it...nowaysj wrote: Will say, its filters are not the best.
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
Re: Do you think NI's Massive is worth it's rep?
+13za wrote:Massive is a fantastic workhorse.
Screw the rep, and the people that use it to make shitty dubstep basslines.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests