Suggestion for the production forum - Producers Q+A
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Suggestion for the production forum - Producers Q+A
This idea is blatantly taken from DOA and other such sites, but...
Don't you think it would be good to have a guest producer (someone who has releases) open themselves up to production questions from the forum heads?
Maybe a new producer each month, with the forum heads nominating a producer of choice.
Your thoughts?
Don't you think it would be good to have a guest producer (someone who has releases) open themselves up to production questions from the forum heads?
Maybe a new producer each month, with the forum heads nominating a producer of choice.
Your thoughts?
-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
I already made a thread suggesting this but no one was up for it.
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t ... highlight=
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t ... highlight=
-
two oh one
- Posts: 2786
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:30 am
- Location: Croydon ---> Los Angeles
- Contact:
Dubstep is a small tree. Those at the top of it are still very close to the ground and many aren't willing to give away 'secrets' to those others who're struggling to clamber their way up.
For answers, you should look outside of Dubstep production info, otherwise it's going to get inbred with sameness, like D&B. I mean, really. It's not as if DS is using techniques that aren't already being utilised freely elsewhere. Even the mighty wobble is a second-hand trick.
For answers, you should look outside of Dubstep production info, otherwise it's going to get inbred with sameness, like D&B. I mean, really. It's not as if DS is using techniques that aren't already being utilised freely elsewhere. Even the mighty wobble is a second-hand trick.
-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
thats true, but it would still be interesting to ask producers specific questions about their tunes, like 'coki, what the fuck where you smoking when you came up with earth a run red?'two oh one wrote: For answers, you should look outside of Dubstep production info, otherwise it's going to get inbred with sameness, like D&B. I mean, really. It's not as if DS is using techniques that aren't already being utilised freely elsewhere. Even the mighty wobble is a second-hand trick.
- thesynthesist
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:05 pm
- Location: the Right side of Computo's brain...
- Contact:
I find that generally those who are unwilling to discuss their methods are the ones who preset hop the most.two oh one wrote:Dubstep is a small tree. Those at the top of it are still very close to the ground and many aren't willing to give away 'secrets' to those others who're struggling to clamber their way up.
You dont have to show exactly how you get that super-duper new sound you made yesterday thats gonna make your new track a hit, but you dont have to go that far to be generous.
-
tudniillik
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:19 am
-
psychonaught
- Posts: 640
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 5:19 pm
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
- Contact:
- thesynthesist
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:05 pm
- Location: the Right side of Computo's brain...
- Contact:
The DoQ Q&A sessions are absolute shite for the most part
most the info anyone needs is already available on the internet and people just need to put in the effort to find it and/or understand it
there is NO need for 15page forum Q&A topics so people can ask 'big names' about how they were influenced, how they start making tracks, what processing they use etc. The fat that Nu:Tone creates and layers subtractor patches for his basslines is neither here nor there, you could get the same bassline 100 other ways - if it takes a 'big name' to inform you that bass comes from synths then you're far too lazy and should sod off
most the info anyone needs is already available on the internet and people just need to put in the effort to find it and/or understand it
there is NO need for 15page forum Q&A topics so people can ask 'big names' about how they were influenced, how they start making tracks, what processing they use etc. The fat that Nu:Tone creates and layers subtractor patches for his basslines is neither here nor there, you could get the same bassline 100 other ways - if it takes a 'big name' to inform you that bass comes from synths then you're far too lazy and should sod off
you're really under no compulsion to read them are you?Chunkie wrote:The DoQ Q&A sessions are absolute shite for the most part
most the info anyone needs is already available on the internet and people just need to put in the effort to find it and/or understand it
Personally I find some of them interesting, the Paradox & Polar ones in particular, and I don't even write beats these days...
There is something like this under discussion between us Mods, will post if/when more info is forthcoming.
-
John Locke
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:00 pm
- Location: Bottle Bong
nothing against the idea, but i'm not sure big names are really doing anything so different to everyone else. they r just doing it with more talent.
there's only a certain limited number of production techniques in existence and like chunkie says there out there for the finding already if u bother to look.
yeah, there's definitely stuff to be learnt from other people. but big names r not neccessarily more technical than smaller ones. theres plenty of advice on here and other forums from knowledgable ppl already.
and considering the number of threads i seen on this forum discussing/hypotheticising over burial's techniques, u might expect more people 2b coming out with stuf thats the same...but its not really the technique that makes it special. and i think thats the case with most music to b honest, its what u do with the technique that matters
but it doesnt hurt i guess
there's only a certain limited number of production techniques in existence and like chunkie says there out there for the finding already if u bother to look.
yeah, there's definitely stuff to be learnt from other people. but big names r not neccessarily more technical than smaller ones. theres plenty of advice on here and other forums from knowledgable ppl already.
and considering the number of threads i seen on this forum discussing/hypotheticising over burial's techniques, u might expect more people 2b coming out with stuf thats the same...but its not really the technique that makes it special. and i think thats the case with most music to b honest, its what u do with the technique that matters
but it doesnt hurt i guess
- thesynthesist
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:05 pm
- Location: the Right side of Computo's brain...
- Contact:
-
John Locke
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:00 pm
- Location: Bottle Bong
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests



