Yep. I say the same thing often enough. Too much technical stuff and not enough artistry.Shonky wrote:I do think that the production thing has rather taken over.
Thank fuck for Mala.
I do get the feeling that quite a lot wouldn't be interested though. It's good to see the originators getting respect but I think the influences of where people were coming from in the early days were minimal techno, house, 2 step and the basslines of old jungle. Now I think it's more recent drum and bass which predominates (higher emphasis on production, drops (which didn't really exist in a lot of early dubstep), more midrange bass). There's still elements of the original influences but they do seem to be fading (found it odd the other year when someone started talking about minimal techno as the new sound in dubstep).*Grand* wrote:. just is weird that a sound which was very much the beginning of this whole scene has almost completely been forgotten. i doubt 70% of the people on this forum have heard any of the original bad man selection from pre 2003..
yes. shackleton also.luke.envoy wrote:appleblim is a big dj for this! eyes closed and strong floor power. devastating*DeCiBella~~ wrote:Ed G wrote:Used to love just closing my eyes in the club and zoining out...haven't been able to do that for a long time...seckle wrote:
I think my point is this: what is Shackleton doing now that hasn't been done before? Arabic phrase borrowings, ethnic percussion, sub-bass - all well-trodden paths. Don't get me wrong, I adore Shackleton's music, but all he has done is reconfigured what went before into a fresh arrangement. That's all anyone can do. There is nothing new under the sun.hopper wrote:I disagree XOR. It's cyclical up to a point in the way that people take things from the past, and change them into something new. Things don't come around and reach exactly the same point, and there are a lot of innovators right now creating really fresh stuff - try shackleton and flying lotus for example. New musical forms always borrow aspects from other music, it seems impossible (especially now) to create something completely alien from anything else, but things that do are often the most striking and exciting for me personally. I find the whole idea of genre-ising thing a bit frustrating in a way but it is nonetheless completely necessaryXOR wrote:But that's exactly what will happen when new producers come along and start looking at dubstep as a genre with a history - they'll pick out the good bits and use them for inspiration and to reconfigure into new shapes.Fractal wrote:nail on headJubscarz wrote:...there is no point looking back to try and recapture the zeitgeist, move forward and create your own.
Music is more cyclical than it is linear...it's the inspirational reconfiguring of what went before that creates a zeitgeist.
tr0tsky wrote: InI man nuh go to nah rasclot independent ethnic butchers seen.
Selassie-I man shop in Morrisons.
Grand, a lot of people have brought this subject up in various different guises but they've usually been told to stfu or that if they don't like it they should make their own beats. The idea that a listener or critic shouldn't be able to have an opinion if they don't make their own stuff is seriously off point.*Grand* wrote:over the last few months.. i have heard allot of people talk about this issue.. so why does it take someone like me to address it..... maybe i am gonna have to get a weapon of choice .. book me some time of and hold some of those producers to ransom.. make a beat.. that inspires me or its the paddle ... lol..
im just saying there has been an undercurrent of unrest... so why hasn't anyone said hang on a second. maybe we all need to start listening to garage again ...
or those that stopped, pick it back up.
???
can't really agree with this. 2 step makes me want to dance a lot more than most half step beats.i-line wrote:I think the reason there's been a move away from the two step / garage beat based stuff is that it's too hard for a lot of people to dance to. And when you want to engage this 'lot of people' and grow the scene commercially then you need to flatten the beat, hence half-step and tek-step. If you've got a nice strong 1,2, 1,2 then you don't need to worry so much about those annoying k-chi, k-chi bits in between that cause you to have to do something creative with your hips.
Yes, I know and I agree, but I'm talking about 'a lot of people', not you. A lot of people don't like 2 step.UmkhontoWeSizwe wrote:can't really agree with this. 2 step makes me want to dance a lot more than most half step beats.i-line wrote:I think the reason there's been a move away from the two step / garage beat based stuff is that it's too hard for a lot of people to dance to. And when you want to engage this 'lot of people' and grow the scene commercially then you need to flatten the beat, hence half-step and tek-step. If you've got a nice strong 1,2, 1,2 then you don't need to worry so much about those annoying k-chi, k-chi bits in between that cause you to have to do something creative with your hips.
Which is exactly what this thread is about I'd've said. The deeper the music, the further away from the charts it becomes. The more dubstep becomes focused on concise generic structures, big 'hooky' riffs, big drops and jump-up tracks, the more acceptable to the mainstream and to commerce it becomes.UmkhontoWeSizwe wrote:haha, exactly. how many dubstep hits in the top 40 so far?jim wrote:Funny that 2 step garage was about 1000 times more succesfull than dubstep in its day
sorry i should've stated, that was simply a response to the assertion that dubstep lost the swing because most people find halfstep easier to dance to. which is clearly contradicted by the popularity of 2 step garage in the clubs and in the charts way back when.XOR wrote:Which is exactly what this thread is about I'd've said. The deeper the music, the further away from the charts it becomes. The more dubstep becomes focused on concise generic structures, big 'hooky' riffs, big drops and jump-up tracks, the more acceptable to the mainstream and to commerce it becomes.UmkhontoWeSizwe wrote:haha, exactly. how many dubstep hits in the top 40 so far?jim wrote:Funny that 2 step garage was about 1000 times more succesfull than dubstep in its day
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests