hehe i have one jungle tune i did 94 and it's 150 bpm if i remember rightdirtycash wrote:a big part of drum and basses problems started when it keep getting faster & faster...remember it started at around 150=160bpm...

hehe i have one jungle tune i did 94 and it's 150 bpm if i remember rightdirtycash wrote:a big part of drum and basses problems started when it keep getting faster & faster...remember it started at around 150=160bpm...
Gotta disagree completely there mate. There are people still pushing boundaries but when you go to most nights that music will never get played, if you search there is still groundbreaking DnB its just not readily available and blasted down your ear at every night like all the commercialized (and money making) stuff. Innovation is only over when producers stop innovating and many people are still doing that.Pure wrote:On the subject of Drum and Bass. I think its the same as it always has been but its just now we have the wobble jump up tunes thanks to twisted individual(who actually made some good wobble tunes) and people are getting older. Theres only so much inovative stuff you can do. Drum and bass has now done it all and now your bored with it and cant understand why and so blame producers and the scene.
yesyesyesyes! i think this is probably one of the more succinct and dead-on things i have ever read comparing the two.Overcast Radio wrote: Drum and bass seemed to get into macho positing, extended virtuosity, and maximalist rhetoric. Almost like metal did. Could be a reflection on the times and the drugs. Society makes the art, so look at the world you're living in for answers. Dubstep seems to extend into a vertical plane of depth, unlike drum and bass which was horizontal/linear. It truly was a form of Baroque art. Dubstep's duality of feel (70 v. 140 bpm) is truly what makes it special. Some dnb does this too but dubstep breaks conventional subdivision of beat and oscillates between feels instantly. It has time to. It's not trying to beat the world into submission.
Hell. Fucking. Yes.Overcast Radio wrote:And if we all lived forever history would not repeat itself, but we don't, and it does. Everyone on this planet will be dead in 100 years and a new crop of monkeys will show up, miffed because their scene has died. Again. They'll make tunes that are so far ahead, they're timeless. That's my goal.
Jungle did start out as half-speed reggae b-lines against sped up breaks, think this was pretty much the case from around 92/93-96/97. I think although dubstep is hyped as having this duality, a lot of it is actually either one or the other. To be honest, 80's hardcore and speed metal probably exploited this way before eitherOvercast Radio wrote: Drum and bass seemed to get into macho positing, extended virtuosity, and maximalist rhetoric. Almost like metal did. Could be a reflection on the times and the drugs. Society makes the art, so look at the world you're living in for answers. Dubstep seems to extend into a vertical plane of depth, unlike drum and bass which was horizontal/linear. It truly was a form of Baroque art. Dubstep's duality of feel (70 v. 140 bpm) is truly what makes it special. Some dnb does this too but dubstep breaks conventional subdivision of beat and oscillates between feels instantly. It has time to. It's not trying to beat the world into submission.
I don't think that is was DnB's mistake or fault, it happens to another genre of dance music, "golden era's" as people call them end. I believe its healthy that this happens in music in general as something new has to come from the mess!FiASco wrote:drum and bass died when pendulum brought THAT screaming lead sound. everyone in a attempt to get volume now uses the highest loudest sounds possible, not the drums and bass which founded the scene. lets hope dubstep learns from drum and bass's mistake
ok yeah those presets are jokes, but they are a great way to get some results when youre learning the ropesThe biggest failing to electronic music comes from the industry of selling novel technology (such as propellorheads Reason) which offers an easy fast track route to sounding like the big names of your favourite genre...check your factory presets...i'm sure there's a 'drum n bass' sub or break, or DnB kit built in (i don't use it anymore, but thats beside the point).
allow it. it sounds fucking great, most people (rightly) dont give a fuck where stuff comes from coz thats not what its about, production is a competition, if Skream likes it, it's his and it blew the scene away when it popped up. Brilliant track.spencerTron wrote:
(i say all this and i got Skreamism 4 the other day, The track '2D' where he has used the famous preset factory melody pattern of 'BlueMatrix' instrument in Reaktor 5, shocker!:o ) still, good track.
Yeah I agree, there may be some good ideas to come even if the presets have been rinsed. Some of the grime I've heard over the years made me think "where the fuck did that come from", even if the sounds had been used before, the way they were put together was still original. Burial seems to use an awful lot of the same sounds, but musically it's still interesting. Whether something is good or not depends more on musicality than sound design I think, even in electronic genres.Joe C wrote:People SHOULD be making music, it goes further than what our precious ears like, stuff like Reason being so easy to get hold of, so easy to use is doing generations of messed up kids a favour by giving them some results.
Maybe even a few years down the line theyll be running things that will send your musical mind crazy with delight, instead of robbing your grandma.
lol im not blaming dnb. just giving my thoughts on the change that happened and why. u need progression in all forms wether u like them or not. its just a shame when u hold somthing dear and it changes so that the popularity of the new sound dwarfs the founding blocks. maybe im just gettin old! . an advancement in technology also has a lot to do with itHorza wrote:I don't think that is was DnB's mistake or fault, it happens to another genre of dance music, "golden era's" as people call them end. I believe its healthy that this happens in music in general as something new has to come from the mess!FiASco wrote:drum and bass died when pendulum brought THAT screaming lead sound. everyone in a attempt to get volume now uses the highest loudest sounds possible, not the drums and bass which founded the scene. lets hope dubstep learns from drum and bass's mistake
Dunno about that. I reckon about six months after the first caveman began banging two rocks together he was swamped by derivative biters banging very similar rocks together in a slightly less good way.FiASco wrote:lol im not blaming dnb. just giving my thoughts on the change that happened and why. u need progression in all forms wether u like them or not. its just a shame when u hold somthing dear and it changes so that the popularity of the new sound dwarfs the founding blocks. maybe im just gettin old! . an advancement in technology also has a lot to do with it
Shonky wrote:Yeah I agree, there may be some good ideas to come even if the presets have been rinsed. Some of the grime I've heard over the years made me think "where the fuck did that come from", even if the sounds had been used before, the way they were put together was still original. Burial seems to use an awful lot of the same sounds, but musically it's still interesting. Whether something is good or not depends more on musicality than sound design I think, even in electronic genres.Joe C wrote:People SHOULD be making music, it goes further than what our precious ears like, stuff like Reason being so easy to get hold of, so easy to use is doing generations of messed up kids a favour by giving them some results.
Maybe even a few years down the line theyll be running things that will send your musical mind crazy with delight, instead of robbing your grandma.
Joe C wrote:Shonky wrote:Yeah I agree, there may be some good ideas to come even if the presets have been rinsed. Some of the grime I've heard over the years made me think "where the fuck did that come from", even if the sounds had been used before, the way they were put together was still original. Burial seems to use an awful lot of the same sounds, but musically it's still interesting. Whether something is good or not depends more on musicality than sound design I think, even in electronic genres.Joe C wrote:People SHOULD be making music, it goes further than what our precious ears like, stuff like Reason being so easy to get hold of, so easy to use is doing generations of messed up kids a favour by giving them some results.
Maybe even a few years down the line theyll be running things that will send your musical mind crazy with delight, instead of robbing your grandma.
there is an element of limiting tools, the starving artist theory I guess. Give a man 5000 synths hell probably make a self indulgent mess, give a man one synth, one drum machine and a sequencer, and to make something good hes gotta try really hard, but the outcome will be better
Slothrop wrote: Dunno about that. I reckon about six months after the first caveman began banging two rocks together he was swamped by derivative biters banging very similar rocks together in a slightly less good way.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests