NI Massive

r · Post by r » Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:00 pm

2 questions ..

1. How can i put automation on my lfo speed with the sync option on ? (and control it with my macro control later on)

2. How do i put the glide mode on in massive.. i've seen it at the osc tab but i dont know how to put it on.

thanks in advance

daft cunt · Post by **daft cunt** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:24 pm

1. How can i put automation on my lfo speed with the sync option on ?
You can't do that inside of Massive. You have to do it in your host program.

2. How do i put the glide mode on in massive.. i've seen it at the osc tab but i dont know how to put it on.
You have to be in monophonic mode in the voicing panel, then you just turn on the glide knob.

r · Post by r » Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:51 pm

you cant automate things who are in the tab lfo tabs.. so i have to link it to a macro somehow i think

Sub Shifter · Post by **Sub Shifter** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:24 pm

so daft tnuc you can automate sync rate in host like cubase as i tried this and failed couldnt find it in cubase automation tab?

r · Post by r » Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:30 pm

what blaze said

thesynthesist · Post by **thesynthesist** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:13 am

you cant automate the LFO in a host either, unless you are unsynced.

Sub Shifter · Post by **Sub Shifter** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:27 am

thesynthesist wrote:you cant automate the LFO in a host either, unless you are unsynced.

i hope NI implement this feature in a future update.

manray · Post by **manray** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:01 am

blaze wrote:
thesynthesist wrote:you cant automate the LFO in a host either, unless you are unsynced.
i hope NI implement this feature in a future update.

Yeah you either have to get very precise when automating your LFO unsyncd or create another instance just get a different rate on your bass

roqqert · Post by **roqqert** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:42 am

i think i gonna email NI soon to ask how we can automate the synced lfo

Sub Shifter · Post by **Sub Shifter** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:51 pm

surley it wouldnt be that hard for NI to add this feature.

thesynthesist · Post by **thesynthesist** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 11:42 pm

Roqqert wrote:i think i gonna email NI soon to ask how we can automate the synced lfo

Dont bother, you cant automate it.

ive said it before, get enough people talking about it here, and I will show NI, but unless there is a large showing of people who want this changed, it wont happen.

So far, there are no plans to change this, i can tell you with certainty.

r · Post by r » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:34 am

damnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn... =( ... well then we duplicate the channels hahaha

thesynthesist · Post by **thesynthesist** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:42 pm

whoops

auan · Post by **auan** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:20 pm

thesynthesist wrote:
thesynthesist wrote:
Roqqert wrote:i think i gonna email NI soon to ask how we can automate the synced lfo
Dont bother, you cant automate it.

ive said it before, get enough people talking about it here, and I will show NI, but unless there is a large showing of people who want this changed, it wont happen.

but for now there are no plans to change this, i can tell you with certainty.

I'm a long time user of Massive and I'd like it to be known that I want this changed. It's unbelievable that the LFO's can only be synced OR automated. Same with the Performer and Steppers. There's workarounds, sure, but they're such a waste of resources in what's already a CPU-heavy synth. And to be honest, I'd call it the biggest flaw in an almost perfect all-rounder synth.

Will that do?

thesynthesist · Post by **thesynthesist** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:26 pm

That is perfect, anyone else have more to add? Seriously, this will get forwarded...

tempest · Post by **tempest** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:20 pm

co-signed.

We want sync'd automation massive ! let it be known

Sub Shifter · Post by **Sub Shifter** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:01 pm

Auan wrote:
thesynthesist wrote:
thesynthesist wrote:
Roqqert wrote:i think i gonna email NI soon to ask how we can automate the synced lfo
Dont bother, you cant automate it.

ive said it before, get enough people talking about it here, and I will show NI, but unless there is a large showing of people who want this changed, it wont happen.

but for now there are no plans to change this, i can tell you with certainty.
I'm a long time user of Massive and I'd like it to be known that I want this changed. It's unbelievable that the LFO's can only be synced OR automated. Same with the Performer and Steppers. There's workarounds, sure, but they're such a waste of resources in what's already a CPU-heavy synth. And to be honest, I'd call it the biggest flaw in an almost perfect all-rounder synth.

Will that do?

took the words right out of my mouth.

westernsynthetics · Post by **westernsynthetics** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:42 pm

yeh its a pain in the arse

daft cunt · Post by **daft cunt** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:05 am

Just to confirm my answer about automating in the host program was shit (long time i didn't make any music... sorry about the wrong input).
Anyway, I don't see the problem about having several instances running at different lfo speed although that's pretty unfair from NI to have not implemented such basic function in v1.

pompoushit · Post by **pompoushit** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:44 am

Daft tnuc wrote:I don't see the problem about having several instances running at different lfo speed

several instances of massive? u'll need some industry computer for that

I'd rather stick to some other synth

NI Massive

NI Massive

Who is online