The quality of Digital only labels?

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
high rankin
Posts: 185
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:56 am
Location: teh internets

Post by high rankin » Wed Feb 13, 2008 8:14 pm

UFO over easy wrote:
high rankin wrote:Well in theory, but no one really charges more for a wav than £1.50.
he charged £1.50 per tune, it was two tunes..
high rankin wrote:Also, people might think its odd pay-paling you the cash and waiting for you to send them the tune.
Then you would have to work out how you were going to send them a 60meg+ tune so they can only download it once.
People didn't think it was odd when it happened. I guess now the scene is bigger they might do, but generally it was applauded that someone actually got something done properly and efficiently by themselves without resorting to flogging poor quality unmastered files.
Ah, i read that wrong, i'm a bit special. I thought he was talking hypathetically and that he hadn't released anything.
So he did do it all himself through pay pal. Wicked, nice work.
<b>Ruining Dubstep one step at a time<b>

marsyas
Posts: 3034
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:31 pm

Re: ?

Post by marsyas » Wed Feb 13, 2008 8:23 pm

geiom wrote:
I always spent my last money on records even when i was dirt poor - i know loads of other people who have done the same.
only buy digital ish when i have to.

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: ?

Post by abZ » Wed Feb 13, 2008 8:53 pm

geiom wrote:I know this is a bit away from the topic but...what really is the problem with buying records ?

what has changed over the last few years ? are we really all living in shoe boxes now ? (that's one common excuse - not enough room)

are we all beyond dirt poor ? (too expensive - excuse number 2)

no.

what has happened is that we now have a choice, which is super easy - you don't even have to leave the house, and its cheap (or even free)

in terms of straight cash, records are only a bit more expensive than they were years ago - but that's just inflation - i don't see anyone saying - "I only eat digital food now cause i can't afford to go to the shops..."

I always spent my last money on records even when i was dirt poor - i know loads of other people who have done the same.

I feel for those peeps who have no record shop in their town or who live in the countryside, but there is always mail order..

before CD copying came along, you either had a cassette copy off your mate, or you had THE REAL THING.

that was it.

and if someone was DJ'ing, you knew that they had the vinyl record. or a dubplate. or the original CD single/album.

so to me, Vinyl has always had the same 'problems' but now we just have an easy escape route from it.

what do you think ?
What has changed is everyone that wasn't too keen on using cd players is now using vinyl emulation. Now you can be a bit pickier on the vinyl you choose. I still buy vinyl when I can. I spin digital but I have a respectable collection of dubstep vinyl. The thing is I can't spend my last 20 on some new records. I have a wife/kid/house and another kid on the way! I would be a scum bag if I didn't use my last 20 on food for the fammo. Once the new kid arrives I might not be able to buy records ever again! It sucks but I have to deal with it. Thank god for the "easy eascape route" I will still be able to dj even though the funds will be tight. I'm not trying to be a dick but you have to look at this from other peoples perspective.

User avatar
djshiva
Posts: 4933
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:13 pm
Location: aka sapphic_beats Indianaptizzle, IN USA
Contact:

Re: ?

Post by djshiva » Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:52 pm

geiom wrote:I know this is a bit away from the topic but...what really is the problem with buying records ?

what has changed over the last few years ? are we really all living in shoe boxes now ? (that's one common excuse - not enough room)
no shoe box, but i do live in a city that currently has no record shop, and i have never been a fan of ordering vinyl online. impatient. me no likey waitey. ;) when we had a shop, i spent a crap ton on records. but then, i got paid better for DJing back then (because there was money in the scene then, unlike now), i had an ok job and also...that was my ONLY option if i wanted the music. things have changed in a big way on both those fronts.
geiom wrote:are we all beyond dirt poor ? (too expensive - excuse number 2)

no.
yes. i can only speak for myself (and perhaps just americans in general) when i say that the economy has tanked here, and the exchange rate between USD and GBP is horrid for anyone here who wants to order records (specifically ordering from the UK or even just buying imports).

plus, if you are in the midwest US, the "scene" (whatever that was) also tanked a few years ago, and no one has money to pay (or just is too cheap to pay) the DJs much at all anymore. it has become harder and harder to justify spending a week's pay on vinyl, when you can get even more music in the digital format (by the way, that means more in pocket money for the producers, and less overhead...i like knowing more of my money is getting to the artists).
geiom wrote:what has happened is that we now have a choice, which is super easy - you don't even have to leave the house, and its cheap (or even free)
and i think you just hit it on the head. before we didn't have a choice of formats, because it was vinyl or nothing. times have changed, technology has expanded, and ya can't stuff the genie back in the bottle, no matter how hard you try.
geiom wrote:in terms of straight cash, records are only a bit more expensive than they were years ago - but that's just inflation - i don't see anyone saying - "I only eat digital food now cause i can't afford to go to the shops..."

I always spent my last money on records even when i was dirt poor - i know loads of other people who have done the same.
see above for explanation of US economic situation. ;)

i used to spend every penny on vinyl, and i was an irresponsible lout who didn't pay her other bills. i grew up and realized it wasn't getting me anywhere. plus consider too, that many longtime music heads have gotten older, have families, and just in general have more responsibility than they did when they were younger. if a mom or dad has to choose between records and feeding their kids...well, sorry...the decision should be obvious.

also, it got really expensive buying a record with only 2 tunes on it, maybe even only one i really wanted. i can get MORE music for less money, AND i can cut out the filler that i don't really want. if i decide, whoops i actually liked that tune, it won't be sold out (making me wait for a repress that may never happen). i can go back and get it. voila! more money in your pockets producer types! ;)

here is something to think about, which i have posted before and will keep saying. i don't buy a TON of dubstep vinyl. if a track isn't coming out digitally, and i simply MUST have it, i will plonk down the extra to get the record. but most of the time i buy digital. when i play those tunes out, i make sure people who want to know what the tune is, get the name of it.

just last night someone (NOT a dj) at the club i was at heard the quarta 330 tune "sunset dub" and loved it. she isn't gonna buy vinyl, so i gave her all the info she needs to buy it off of beatport. she wrote it all down and i am sure she went home and potentially bought the tune. if a vinyl dj comes up asking the same question, i am gonna give them the song info, plus a few places where they can order the vinyl. we can argue about this all day long, but the fact is, whether you are using vinyl or digital formats, you are STILL promoting the music, which is the unspoken, underlying job of a DJ (hence why people send out promo dubs to other DJs). regardless of format, that gets done if the tunes get heard.

i fully support the vinyl side of tings, and i want to see it stick around and flourish. i have quite the collection myself from 13 years of vinyl addiction. i always encourage DJs (and fans) to buy the tunes, in whatever format works best for them. but i got a little more adventurous with my DJing methods, and decided to go digital in order to do the things i really want to do with the music. it's been fun, and i still order WAY too much music than i can actually afford.

plus keep in mind that many clubs now have both turntables AND CD decks available. i know MANY DJs who use mixed formats when they play; sometimes combining serato/final scratch and regular vinyl, sometimes vinyl and CDs, sometimes vinyl and ableton. just the other day i did an electro set using my classic electro on vinyl, as well as some newer tunes (classic electro re-releases and dubstep) that i had bought digitally and played on CD. the choices have expanded and i think it's only a good thing for the music market in general.

we can debate this all day long really, but it still isn't gonna change the fact that time advances, as does technology, and it's not gonna revert back to the past in order to satisfy the luddites. ;)

we have more options than ever available to get great music into the hands of people who love it. and now we are not just relegating the music to a handful of DJs who play vinyl; the market expands to the fans, and now the DJs don't have a stranglehold on the music, which i personally think is an underlying part of the reason for all the whinging. but with more options comes more possibilities for the wonderful people MAKING the music to do more than just survive. and i am OK with that.

oh and p.s. i bought ramadanman's releases using the paypal method, and i thought it was a fantastic idea! his was a name i recognized, so i trusted that he wouldn't fuck anyone over (wouldn't do his rep any good if he did), he got the links to me fast, and even chucked in a VIP remix for folks who bought the second release. he mastered em with the big guys, the tunes sounded great, and i knew my money was going DIRECTLY to the artist. everybody wins!
Here, have a free tune:
Soundcloud

User avatar
stormfield
Posts: 854
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:29 pm
Location: babylondon
Contact:

Re: ?

Post by stormfield » Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:11 am

geiom wrote: what has changed over the last few years ?

what do you think ?
You made fair points in favour of vinyl, however I think the basic difference lies in how the younger (internet) generation views music.

I think it's fair to say (for better or worse) that people who spend a lot of time using computers, aim, msn, broadband etc will be more open to the idea of music as data.

Records used to be the format for releases, then came cassettes, CDs, minidiscs and now mp3s / Flacs / wavs. Vinyl has held it's ground in terms of DJ friendliness and sound quality, but there exist more and more software alternatives now, plus people are able to carry much more music in their machines than previously possible.

The music itself has to come first... and to fetishise a format whether digital or vinyl is just... er.. a fetish!

To turn the argument around, I grew up in the 70's/80's and had only a cassette player. Yet if I saw a tune, but it came out on vinyl and in no other format, then I'd buy that 12" anyway... and eventually get a mate to record it onto tape for me.
COMBAT 021 : SCORN
"Gravel Bed" - OUT NOW
vinyl // digital // COMBAT HQ // mywace
Combat Recordings on Farcebook

guerillaeye
Posts: 1871
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:56 pm
Location: NEPA

Post by guerillaeye » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:12 am

HEFTY HEFTY HEFTY!
Image


wimpy wimpy wimpy!
Image

User avatar
djshiva
Posts: 4933
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:13 pm
Location: aka sapphic_beats Indianaptizzle, IN USA
Contact:

Post by djshiva » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:34 am

guerillaeye wrote:HEFTY HEFTY HEFTY!
Image
Image
Here, have a free tune:
Soundcloud

guerillaeye
Posts: 1871
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:56 pm
Location: NEPA

Post by guerillaeye » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:45 am

sapphic_beats wrote: Image
Image

:baby:

guerillaeye
Posts: 1871
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:56 pm
Location: NEPA

Post by guerillaeye » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:50 am

sapphic_beats wrote:
guerillaeye wrote:HEFTY HEFTY HEFTY!
Image
Image

User avatar
djshiva
Posts: 4933
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:13 pm
Location: aka sapphic_beats Indianaptizzle, IN USA
Contact:

Post by djshiva » Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:53 am

guerillaeye wrote:
sapphic_beats wrote: Image
Image

:baby:
ROTFL.

somehow i don't think nuclear holocaust is gonna be any kinder to vinyl. nor do i think our ashen remains will care much.

but maybe then this retarded argument would finally be irrelevant.
Last edited by djshiva on Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Here, have a free tune:
Soundcloud

User avatar
cody
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:16 pm
Location: LDN//UK
Contact:

Post by cody » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:01 am

for the past 30+ years music has gone backwards.

if yu imagine vinyl's has the largest wave form

cd has slightly less

and mp3 less again

this mean a digital version of as vinyl release will have lower highs ansdhigher lows than the original,

as a society we are being fooled into the belief that mp3's are the greatest thing ever when in fact they are worse in terms of audio quality than vinyl.

User avatar
djshiva
Posts: 4933
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:13 pm
Location: aka sapphic_beats Indianaptizzle, IN USA
Contact:

Post by djshiva » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:04 am

cody wrote:for the past 30+ years music has gone backwards.

if yu imagine vinyl's has the largest wave form

cd has slightly less

and mp3 less again

this mean a digital version of as vinyl release will have lower highs ansdhigher lows than the original,

as a society we are being fooled into the belief that mp3's are the greatest thing ever when in fact they are worse in terms of audio quality than vinyl.
ahem. yeah ok.

a) bullshit on digital having less highs and less lows.

b) many places are selling wavs and FLAC as well as mp3.

oh and by the way, this really fast computer i have, it's just a little too digital for me. can someone give me an abacus so i can represent the old school? yo.
Here, have a free tune:
Soundcloud

User avatar
bob crunkhouse
Posts: 2165
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:24 pm
Location: Bwighton, Dirty South

Post by bob crunkhouse » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:06 am

sapphic_beats wrote:
cody wrote:for the past 30+ years music has gone backwards.

if yu imagine vinyl's has the largest wave form

cd has slightly less

and mp3 less again

this mean a digital version of as vinyl release will have lower highs ansdhigher lows than the original,

as a society we are being fooled into the belief that mp3's are the greatest thing ever when in fact they are worse in terms of audio quality than vinyl.
ahem. yeah ok.

a) bullshit on digital having less highs and less lows.

b) many places are selling wavs and FLAC as well as mp3.

oh and by the way, this really fast computer i have, it's just a little too digital for me. can someone give me an abacus so i can represent the old school? yo.
Ha! spot on mate.
Square Roots

Plastician, Tempa T, Joy Orbison @ Audio, Brighton - September 4th

The Field (Live) + Support @ Audio, Brighton - November 11th

DMZ in Brighton - Mala/Loefah/Pokes @ Audio, Brighton - November 13th

User avatar
cody
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:16 pm
Location: LDN//UK
Contact:

Post by cody » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:07 am

sapphic_beats wrote:
cody wrote:for the past 30+ years music has gone backwards.

if yu imagine vinyl's has the largest wave form

cd has slightly less

and mp3 less again

this mean a digital version of as vinyl release will have lower highs ansdhigher lows than the original,

as a society we are being fooled into the belief that mp3's are the greatest thing ever when in fact they are worse in terms of audio quality than vinyl.
ahem. yeah ok.

a) bullshit on digital having less highs and less lows.

its a fact

User avatar
djshiva
Posts: 4933
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:13 pm
Location: aka sapphic_beats Indianaptizzle, IN USA
Contact:

Post by djshiva » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:12 am

cody wrote:
sapphic_beats wrote:
cody wrote:for the past 30+ years music has gone backwards.

if yu imagine vinyl's has the largest wave form

cd has slightly less

and mp3 less again

this mean a digital version of as vinyl release will have lower highs ansdhigher lows than the original,

as a society we are being fooled into the belief that mp3's are the greatest thing ever when in fact they are worse in terms of audio quality than vinyl.
ahem. yeah ok.

a) bullshit on digital having less highs and less lows.

its a fact
that's funny, because even professional engineers are still arguing about this so-called "fact". that tells me that definitive assessments such as the one you stated are still far from proven.

http://www.guitar9.com/columnist226.html nice lil article on the topic.

depending on the mastering engineer, an analog approach can sound like total shit, and a digital approach can sound awesome. at the end of the day, the main thing i care about, is creativity and good music.

is it good? is there some feeling in it? good. vinyl or digital, i could care less.

i am done with this topic, cuz it's mostly a bunch of windbaggery for the sake of sounding smart. make your tunes and play your tunes, and fuck the rest.
Here, have a free tune:
Soundcloud

User avatar
alien pimp
Posts: 5739
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 11:51 am
Location: 13 Years 1 Love
Contact:

Post by alien pimp » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:22 am

i've heard artists' masters screwed by professional engineers from serious studios
i've heard gems released digitally that would never pay off if released on wax
i've heard wax labels saying: this is pure dopeness, but considering the market, won't sell good enough!
i've heard kids saying: there's no recordshops in my city (even my country!), so thanks for making such music available for me, at least i have a card!
i've heard lots of labels complaining about getting screwed by the vinyl distros!
i've heard vinyl is polluting!
i've heard they cut loads of trees to make paper labels to package sound!
i've heard my parents saying b/w tv was way cooler than colour tv!
i've looked my watch and it said: time to get real!
ADULT BASS MUSIC VOL. 1 - MIDTEMPO + UPTEMPO EDITIONS - OUT NOW!

Soundcloud
Soundcloud
http://dubkraftrecords.com
http://silviucostinescu.info

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Post by abZ » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:36 am

Hey the guerilla how did you like it that I brought a crate AND a comp with me to Willkes Barre. Fatman got you beat son.

BTW, what where those wimpy little shiny things that you were playin with during your set?
:wink:

User avatar
alien pimp
Posts: 5739
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 11:51 am
Location: 13 Years 1 Love
Contact:

Post by alien pimp » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:39 am

abZ wrote: BTW, what where those wimpy little shiny things that you were playin with during your set?
:wink:
i-vinyls!
ADULT BASS MUSIC VOL. 1 - MIDTEMPO + UPTEMPO EDITIONS - OUT NOW!

Soundcloud
Soundcloud
http://dubkraftrecords.com
http://silviucostinescu.info

ufo over easy
Posts: 4589
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:27 am

Post by ufo over easy » Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:24 am

cody wrote:
sapphic_beats wrote:
cody wrote:for the past 30+ years music has gone backwards.

if yu imagine vinyl's has the largest wave form

cd has slightly less

and mp3 less again

this mean a digital version of as vinyl release will have lower highs ansdhigher lows than the original,

as a society we are being fooled into the belief that mp3's are the greatest thing ever when in fact they are worse in terms of audio quality than vinyl.
ahem. yeah ok.

a) bullshit on digital having less highs and less lows.

its a fact
I love vinyl too but you're confused on this cody :)
:d:

forensix (mcr)
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:58 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Post by forensix (mcr) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:36 am

UFO over easy wrote: I love vinyl too but you're confused on this cody :)
agreed
The theory that vinyl records can audibly represent lower frequencies that compact discs cannot (making the recording sound "warmer") is largely a myth - according to Red Book specifications, the compact disc has a frequency response of 20 Hz to 22.05 kHz, while the human auditory system is sensitive to frequencies from 20 Hz to a maximum of around 20,000 Hz. This means that any frequencies that a vinyl record can represent that a compact disc cannot would be inaudible and thus completely subliminal.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests