boomnoise wrote:
i would argue that there is only a handful of producers who have really challenged the originators quality and it is these producers who can be thought of as 'forward thinking' because, as i said before, it's a relative concept and the originators provide the bench mark.
Yes! i can definitely agree with you there. A benchmark has been set, and continues to be set - be many of the originators. I feel that we give them the benefit of the doubt sometimes, as i dont believe it's possible to have a consistently amazing output. you're gonna have some misses occasionally, but the dubstep "sound" being developed by many of the originators feels very mature, despite many of the minimalist qualities of some tracks.
There are so many tracks released by people like benga, shackleton, vex'd, etc, that i hear and thing "why didnt i think of that! its so simple, yet effective." but, as loefah once said in an interview (paraphrasing here), if its already been done, why would you go and do it again? Why would he use mala's ideas, when those ideas are identifiably mala's?
so yeah, to me, forward thinking seems to be that feeling i get when i hear a tune and that phrase "why didnt i think if that!?" pops into my head. Also, i agree with corpsey, there isnt really a "forward", but more of a branching off into various directions. it seems like his definition of "acting against stagnation" is a concise definition to me. It's definitely not the producer's job to carry the genre on his back every time he makes a tune though. Everyone wants to make the next big track, or be responsible for a new direction in this musical movement, but i think that, ironically, moving forward is something happening gradually, by a large collective of producers and DJs.
@flippo: its not that i dont "get it" man. Im interested in your opinions on what it means for a track to be forward thinking. how do you define it, etc...