edgar cayce/the shift

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:47 pm

edgar cayce said that a lot of extraordinary people are being reincarnated on earth lately for the purpose of bringing on the coming shift in human consciousness

some people say that indigos are such individuals

there's another breed of quacks out there who think that the shift is going to happen when the solar system enters the photon belt in 2012.

i mean shift or no shift, its a pretty popular idea in the collective consciousness that there is going to be a spiritual evolution of sorts and that we're on the cusp of it right now.

FSTZ · Post by **FSTZ** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:49 pm

yep

don't know what, but something is going to happen

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:50 pm

i'm talking about beyond apocalypse or anything like that. i'm just talking about human consciousness/perception

shonky · Post by **shonky** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:50 pm

Seems more devolution on the streets lately.

Not taking the piss, but how many of these reincarnations are duplicates and isn't past life regression a bit dubious to say the least. I mean there's always a lot of Napoleons and Cleopatras from what I can remember

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:52 pm

Shonky wrote:Seems more devolution on the streets lately.

Not taking the piss, but how many of these reincarnations are duplicates and isn't past life regression a bit dubious to say the least. I mean there's always a lot of Napoleons and Cleopatras from what I can remember

c'mon shonx. the cynic not believing in reincarnation is like the RunDMC fan wearing adidas

__________ · Post by **__________** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:53 pm

in 2012 there will be a repress of dmz007...that's what all the fuss is about.

FSTZ · Post by **FSTZ** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:55 pm

Parson wrote:i'm talking about beyond apocalypse or anything like that. i'm just talking about human consciousness/perception

oh I know

Moore's Law

Intel co-founder Gordon Moore is a visonary. In 1965, his prediction, popularly known as Moore's Law, states that the number of transistors on a chip will double about every two years. And Intel has kept that pace for nearly 40 years. Today, we continue to help move the industry forward by delivering:

A worldwide silicon fab network with seven high volume fabs and another due to open in 2008
The world's first 32nm silicon technology on-target for delivery in 2009
The world's first 2-billion transistor microprocessor delivered in next-generation Intel® Itanium® processors codenamed Tukwila
Revolutionary technologies on a chip, like hafnium-infused high-k metal gate in production today
Advanced research into tri-gate transistors and silicon nanotechnology

I heard a guy saying that our minds are accelerating in a similar manner as Moore's law and that the next step in evoloution is an integration of computers and minds

shonky · Post by **shonky** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:59 pm

Parson wrote:
Shonky wrote:Seems more devolution on the streets lately.

Not taking the piss, but how many of these reincarnations are duplicates and isn't past life regression a bit dubious to say the least. I mean there's always a lot of Napoleons and Cleopatras from what I can remember
c'mon shonx. the cynic not believing in reincarnation is like the RunDMC fan wearing adidas

I prefer the term miltant skepticism - I've rebranded

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:59 pm

yeah one of the dudes in waking life goes on about that (responding to festa)

FSTZ · Post by **FSTZ** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:01 pm

but Cayce did predict it to happen around the end of the Mayan calender

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:02 pm

Shonky wrote:
Parson wrote:
Shonky wrote:Seems more devolution on the streets lately.

Not taking the piss, but how many of these reincarnations are duplicates and isn't past life regression a bit dubious to say the least. I mean there's always a lot of Napoleons and Cleopatras from what I can remember
c'mon shonx. the cynic not believing in reincarnation is like the RunDMC fan wearing adidas
I prefer the term miltant skepticism - I've rebranded

what's that? can't say i'm familiar with that line of thought

silentk · Post by **silentk** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:02 pm

spritual evolution? god i hope not, i would rather all religions realised how pointless they are. maybe it's just me but i disagree with the very ethos of religion. the idea of leading your entire life (or at least part of ot) around something which cannot be proved? soemthing which only exists through someones belief. without people there to belive on the existance of a so called "god", one would never exist.

also, if you follow a religion, expecialy christianity, your veiw will probably be that God has a "greater purpose" for you no? some kind of "master plan", therefore, if something goes wrong in your life, be it getting fired, loosing a partner, whatever. you will just say "ah, god must have a greater plan for me" yes, it is a good way to deal with this loss, but will not spur you on to find something new, it will only encourage you to wait for "God" to stick something else under your nose?

All religions preach bigotry, "My religion is the best", such an ignorant view. if you religion is the best then why are there others? if the only reason for the existance of your religion is the collective belief in it, then (as i said earlier) surely that is the only reason for the existance of any religion, therfore, there is nothing to seperate them, nothing that puts one above the others. just diferent people believing in diferent things.

then theres the age old truth that every major war or conflict has been caused, feuled, or helped, by religion. and this is undisputable, what would of happend in germany in the 1930's if there hadn't been 6 million jews to slaughter? i suppose we will never know. where would we be today without extremist islam? again, we will never know.

*rant over*....

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:04 pm

SilentK wrote:spritual evolution? god i hope not, i would rather all religions realised how pointless they are. maybe it's just me but i disagree with the very ethos of religion. the idea of leading your entire life (or at least part of ot) around something which cannot be proved? soemthing which only exists through someones belief. without people there to belive on the existance of a so called "god", one would never exist.

also, if you follow a religion, expecialy christianity, your veiw will probably be that God has a "greater purpose" for you no? some kind of "master plan", therefore, if something goes wrong in your life, be it getting fired, loosing a partner, whatever. you will just say "ah, god must have a greater plan for me" yes, it is a good way to deal with this loss, but will not spur you on to find something new, it will only encourage you to wait for "God" to stick something else under your nose?

All religions preach bigotry, "My religion is the best", such an ignorant view. if you religion is the best then why are there others? if the only reason for the existance of your religion is the collective belief in it, then (as i said earlier) surely that is the only reason for the existance of any religion, therfore, there is nothing to seperate them, nothing that puts one above the others. just diferent people believing in diferent things.

then theres the age old truth that every major war or conflict has been caused, feuled, or helped, by religion. and this is undisputable, what would of happend in germany in the 1930's if there hadn't been 6 million jews to slaughter? i suppose we will never know. where would we be today without extremist islam? again, we will never know.

*rant over*....

yeah basically what the shift means is we won't be seeing rants like this anymore.

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:05 pm

basically religion is blind people looking for truth, and englightenment is when you don't need to look or guess or hypothesize anymore.

pk- · Post by **pk-** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:08 pm

i'm hoping to ascend so i can eat breakfast with anubis

shonky · Post by **shonky** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:08 pm

Actually I think Hitler was an atheist and Mao and Stalin definitely were. Most of the others have been killed under capitalism in one guise or another

Having said that, I'm not religious, rather have no hope than false hope.

silentk · Post by **silentk** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:09 pm

Parson wrote:basically religion is blind people looking for truth, and englightenment is when you don't need to look or guess or hypothesize anymore.

sounds like my kinda enlightenment.
understand what you have. before looking to what you don't.

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:09 pm

there's no question that religion has been used as a tool for control since the dawn of man. there's also no question that absolute power corrupts absolutely. there's a lot of corrupt power going on in the church(es).

FSTZ · Post by **FSTZ** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:10 pm

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:11 pm

SilentK wrote:
Parson wrote:basically religion is blind people looking for truth, and englightenment is when you don't need to look or guess or hypothesize anymore.

sounds like my kinda enlightenment.
understand what you have. before looking to what you don't.

well i don't mean merely accepting that you don't know like agnosticism

i'm talking about finally knowing and therefore no longer seeking

edgar cayce/the shift

edgar cayce/the shift

Who is online