debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
			
		
				
			- 
				
																			 epithet
- Permanent Vacation
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:29 pm
						
						
													
							
						
									
						Post
					
								by epithet » Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:40 pm
			
			
			
			
			Hatcha wrote:if any 1 decides 2 change it'it will b us guys that named it 
I doubt if y'all could rename it even if ya tried. The horse has well and truly bolted. If kode9 cant get any traction with hyperdub as a genre name no scene originators is gonna be able to either i reckon. 
Actually maybe oris jay could if he convinved the non croydon lot to branch off 

 
		 
				
		
		 
	 
	
				
		
				
			- 
				
								lukesnarl							
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 5:33 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- 
				Contact:
				
			
						
						
													
							
						
									
						Post
					
								by lukesnarl » Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:07 am
			
			
			
			
			badger wrote:lukesnarl wrote:And just by the by if dubstep were to be split, it would have to be along the Ham and non-Ham lines....
YES! 
 
i can't believe no one has mentioned this before
 
Yes, I know. Seems the obvious choice to me....
 
		 
				
		
		 
	 
	
				
		
				
			- 
				
								stenchman							
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 11:56 pm
- Location: Dutty Dover
						
						
													
							
						
									
						Post
					
								by stenchman » Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:29 am
			
			
			
			
			ozols man wrote:sigha wrote:I dont think Stenchman was talking about splitting the scene as such...
just that some tunes clearly have a dark vibe...some tunes clearly have a light vibe, and i think he was wondering what tunes you would say fall into that magical ethreal 'in-between' territory. 
I listen to alot of music, and would definately agree with the 'good/shit theory' and enjoy the variety of influences you can hear in Dubstep. Inspite of this, I reckon its unrealistic to expect people not to catagorise certain sounds into sub-genres... like it or not, its a natural evolution with any music.
OH YEH ALSO STENCHMAN IS STENCHMAN. DONT LISTEN TO HIS STYLE "REMEMBER" LABELING IS FOR MONEY. LISTEN TO "STENCH MAN" U GET ME. LISTEN TO HIS FREQUENCY. THATS WHY WHEN THE TERM "CHAVS" WAS CREATED BY THE MEDIA I DECIDED TO NEVER SAY IT BECAUSE ITS USED TO PERSECUTE THOSE OF THE GHETTO, WHETHER THEY BE WHITE, BLACK, ASIAN ETC ETC
 
uh?
 
		 
				
		
		 
	 
	
				
		
				
			- 
				
								fractal							
- Mako
- Posts: 12133
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
- Location: emerald city, cascadia
						
						
													
							
						
									
						Post
					
								by fractal » Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:48 am
			
			
			
			
			Stenchman wrote:ozols man wrote:sigha wrote:I dont think Stenchman was talking about splitting the scene as such...
just that some tunes clearly have a dark vibe...some tunes clearly have a light vibe, and i think he was wondering what tunes you would say fall into that magical ethreal 'in-between' territory. 
I listen to alot of music, and would definately agree with the 'good/shit theory' and enjoy the variety of influences you can hear in Dubstep. Inspite of this, I reckon its unrealistic to expect people not to catagorise certain sounds into sub-genres... like it or not, its a natural evolution with any music.
OH YEH ALSO STENCHMAN IS STENCHMAN. DONT LISTEN TO HIS STYLE "REMEMBER" LABELING IS FOR MONEY. LISTEN TO "STENCH MAN" U GET ME. LISTEN TO HIS FREQUENCY. THATS WHY WHEN THE TERM "CHAVS" WAS CREATED BY THE MEDIA I DECIDED TO NEVER SAY IT BECAUSE ITS USED TO PERSECUTE THOSE OF THE GHETTO, WHETHER THEY BE WHITE, BLACK, ASIAN ETC ETC
 
uh?
 
 
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
 
		 
				
		
		 
	 
	
	
	
	
		
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests