i don't really know what i'm doing..

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
pk-
Posts: 4367
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:53 pm
Location: SE15
Contact:

i don't really know what i'm doing..

Post by pk- » Tue Jun 20, 2006 10:16 pm

..but i thought i'd have a go at making some dubstep, just wondered if anyone could give me any pointers as to where i'm going wrong? (it'd be a pretty long list, i reckon). i really like making drumbeats but i haven't a musical bone in my body.

www.myspace.com/pubstep

both tunes seem to have become much muddier after i uploaded them onto myspace, i suppose they compress them quite a bit?

they're both unfinished as well i'm afraid :(

any comments or suggestions much appreciated!

techmouse
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:43 pm
Location: Nottingham / London
Contact:

Post by techmouse » Wed Jun 21, 2006 9:47 am

Not sounding too bad for a starting point.

I'd try:

1. Go mental with some filters on the bass noises. Really liven them up and give them some dynamics. Easy on the resonance, because you don't want people to go deaf.

2. Little bit of distortion to add grit. Nothing too nasty and digital.

3. Lacks a bit of high end sparkle. Try an excitation plug in.

The muddiness you're talking about can be cleared up by spacing out your noises a bit more. Tighten them up with envelopes and filtering, and maybe add some stereo imaging.
Image

User avatar
theverdict
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Dirty South

Post by theverdict » Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:51 am

Yea Im liking those drums on both tracks.
Add more fx like filters,reverb etc...

User avatar
thomas edison
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:26 am
Location: rottadam

Post by thomas edison » Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:26 am

same here for the drums, always had a thing for echoing snares, some more bass would do the trick i guess

User avatar
robotic
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 7:05 pm
Location: berlin
Contact:

Post by robotic » Wed Jun 21, 2006 1:41 pm

for someone who doesn't know what they're doing, these tracks sound pretty damn good! :D the drum sequencing is solid and the selection of instruments/samples sounds good to me also. as far as equing/filtering to make room for each of the samples, i don't think it's necessary with these tunes, though it's a bit hard to tell as - you guessed it - myspace by default encodes your files into crappy 96kbps mp3s. i would stay away from exciter plugins altogether and use artificial stereo imaging only sparingly, if at all. these tunes sound organic and imo overdistorting and overstereo-ing will rob them of that quality.

the melodic parts could use some work/progression, and i think this is what you were referring to with the 'no musical bone' argument, but then, a lot of dubstep is so reserved and minimal-sounding when it comes to melodies and melodic progression, that often single-note pads are sustained or switched on and off and that's it! not everyone has to sound like a skream, y'know?

one last thing: the simpleton symphony bit sounds - in its melodic components - very similar to skream's tune 'bahlfwd', esp. in the intro. not sure whether this is intended or not, but you may want to vary it up a bit so as to avoid obvious comparisons.... unless you're up for that! :wink:

pk-
Posts: 4367
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:53 pm
Location: SE15
Contact:

Post by pk- » Wed Jun 21, 2006 8:57 pm

thanks alot for the suggestions! unfortunately due to my musical ignorance things like
Try an excitation plug in.
or
stay away from exciter plugins altogether and use artificial stereo imaging only sparingly, if at all.
go right over my head, but i'll read up on what you mean.
the melodic parts could use some work/progression, and i think this is what you were referring to with the 'no musical bone' argument
yeah that's exactly what i mean, any melodies i try to make always end up sounding very simplistic - and not in a good sort of minimalist way, just in a bait sort of Casio keyboard demo song way ;p
one last thing: the simpleton symphony bit sounds - in its melodic components - very similar to skream's tune 'bahlfwd', esp. in the intro. not sure whether this is intended or not, but you may want to vary it up a bit so as to avoid obvious comparisons.... unless you're up for that!
:o i've never heard it, i'll have a listen now!

just thought i'd add i realise its a bit presumtuous posting these tunes and expecting comments without having first commented on other people's stuff - but i can't really add any constructive criticism other than 'yes mate that sounds heavy' lol. cheers anyway!

techmouse
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:43 pm
Location: Nottingham / London
Contact:

Post by techmouse » Thu Jun 22, 2006 9:15 am

pk- wrote:thanks alot for the suggestions! unfortunately due to my musical ignorance things like
Try an excitation plug in.
or
stay away from exciter plugins altogether and use artificial stereo imaging only sparingly, if at all.
go right over my head, but i'll read up on what you mean.
In a nutshell, an Exciter adds definition and sparkle to the high frequencies.

Horses for courses really, I'm from a Techno background so I like stuff that sends soundsystems and revellers mental.
Image

User avatar
clarkycatdealer
Posts: 429
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:55 am
Location: london

Post by clarkycatdealer » Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:26 pm

revellers.......


pukes. everywhere.

shonky
Posts: 9754
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 6:31 pm

Post by shonky » Thu Jun 22, 2006 5:33 pm

clarkycatDealer wrote:revellers.......


pukes. everywhere.
:lol: Sounding like a pissed up schizo there^^^Interesting point well made I think.

Eevul - I'd try a bit more groove to the drums, they seem a bit too boom-bap to my tastes, bit more syncopation called for I think. Liking the arpeggiated synth though, adds a nice hook to hang the rest of the track on

Like Clatter, the intro chords remind me a bit of old Underworld stuff, the drums have got that sort of John Bonham heaviness feel to it, not sure if the parts gel together quite well, but sounds good to my ear.

Simpleton Symphony - like the strings, bit of high drama in there

I'd look at layering the bass parts and using a bit more reverb and delay to give the tracks more space.

Wouldn't worry about the non-muso thing - Burial said exactly the same thing about his music.
Hmm....

Image

pk-
Posts: 4367
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:53 pm
Location: SE15
Contact:

Post by pk- » Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:56 pm

cheers for the comments Shonky, i was wondering what does everyone mean when you talk about giving a track 'space'?

my vague understanding is it's...dedicating certain frequencies specifically to certain instruments, but i'm betting i've got completely the wrong end of the stick...

with regards to eevul; i'm just uploading the new version that i worked on this afternoon, the one i put up there yesterday was just a basic outline to illustrate a point about LFOs to a mate. i've added more fills and variation to it, let us know what you think!

shonky
Posts: 9754
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 6:31 pm

Post by shonky » Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:27 pm

Yeah, that's well improved there, like those occassional grunt sounds coming from the bass, quite attention grabbing, really jump out of the mix.

Coming along nicely I think :D
Hmm....

Image

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests