all rights of the manufacture and the owner of blah blah...

dubnerd · Post by **dubnerd** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:37 pm

just for reference sakes, is it mandatory to have this kind of copyright babble stated on a release?

seckle · Post by **seckle** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:09 pm

DubNerd wrote:just for reference sakes, is it mandatory to have this kind of copyright babble stated on a release?

no, but whats the point of not having it on there?

dubnerd · Post by **dubnerd** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:13 pm

i was just curious because if i had a label, i wouldn't want it on the print work.

seckle · Post by **seckle** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:07 am

DubNerd wrote:i was just curious because if i had a label, i wouldn't want it on the print work.

i just meant that, by having it on the label you'd have something to stand on if you ever had legal problems or had to take someone to court. without it, you have nothing to stand on. thats all.

good luck.

pete_bubonic · Post by **pete_bubonic** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:17 am

DubNerd wrote:i was just curious because if i had a label, i wouldn't want it on the print work.

Between you and me, if you had a label, you really really WOULD want that on the print work.

deamonds · Post by **deamonds** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:26 am

DubNerd wrote:i was just curious because if i had a label, i wouldn't want it on the print work.

wassman

ashley · Post by **ashley** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:30 am

DubNerd wrote:i was just curious because if i had a label, i wouldn't want it on the print work.

Its only a shitty bit of text that goes around the edge...

ory · Post by **ory** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:31 am

That copyright stuff doesn't look very gully though.

ashley · Post by **ashley** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:32 am

Ory wrote:That copyright stuff doesn't look very gully though.

Surely its not about whats printed onto it but whats cut onto it is why people buy it?

ory · Post by **ory** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:45 am

I should've added:

Pada · Post by **Pada** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:12 am

JME has funny versions of it on all BBK releases "all recording is copyright, i knwo where you live!" etc.

ory · Post by **ory** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:53 pm

I like the one on Soul Motive 001.

"Unauthorised hiring, lending, public performance and broadcast are strictly prohibited and if you do, the man dem will hunt you down and unleash the murkage."

dubnerd · Post by **dubnerd** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 5:16 pm

wouldn't public humiliation and a general lack of respect within a scene for a producer be far worse than a fine? or is it to do more with major label producers nicking your tune idea for a shitty chart song and then selling millions? out right ripping off i can understand, but saying you shouldn't be lending and broadcasting. the copyright regime can go such my balls.

all rights of the manufacture and the owner of blah blah...

all rights of the manufacture and the owner of blah blah...

Re: all rights of the manufacture and the owner of blah blah

Who is online