Skull010

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
User avatar
joe muggs
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:47 pm
Location: Sydenham, baby!

Skull010

Post by joe muggs » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:50 pm

FUCK. YES.

User avatar
powerpill
Posts: 1570
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: NW London

Post by powerpill » Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:00 pm

eh?

User avatar
joe muggs
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:47 pm
Location: Sydenham, baby!

Post by joe muggs » Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:02 pm

The Rope Tightens...


...But The Branch Is Weak. :o

User avatar
primate
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:50 pm
Location: stockholm
Contact:

Post by primate » Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:04 pm

WHEN?

User avatar
joe muggs
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:47 pm
Location: Sydenham, baby!

Post by joe muggs » Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:04 pm

Sorry, I'm being a berk.

Just quite excited about a new Shackleton 12" :D


Mid September. It's 4 old (unreleased) tracks reworked as far as I can tell.
Last edited by joe muggs on Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
powerpill
Posts: 1570
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: NW London

Post by powerpill » Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:05 pm

should be good.

pacomari
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 2:00 pm
Location: Glasgow

Post by pacomari » Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:40 pm

shick shack where you and your mens at?

fearless
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 8:46 pm

Re: Skull010

Post by fearless » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:19 pm

Joe Muggs wrote:FUCK. YES.

User avatar
thinking
Posts: 4753
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Bristal

Post by thinking » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:14 pm

just had a listen and it's very nice.

That said, I'm not 100% sure why everyone is still getting excited about Shack's new stuff - not that it's not good, but I don't see lots of people hyped about other similar dubby chugging techno - it seems that the vague dubstep connection still causes some excitement...
BLACK BOX & BOX CLEVER

Image
paulie wrote:Thinking >>>> everyone else on this forum.

User avatar
prisoner
Posts: 1905
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: MPLS

Post by prisoner » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:25 pm

ThinKing wrote:just had a listen and it's very nice.

That said, I'm not 100% sure why everyone is still getting excited about Shack's new stuff - not that it's not good, but I don't see lots of people hyped about other similar dubby chugging techno - it seems that the vague dubstep connection still causes some excitement...
there's much better stuff out there in that relm too imo.

User avatar
thinking
Posts: 4753
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Bristal

Post by thinking » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:31 pm

tbh I don't really have an opinion on that - I like Shack's newer stuff alright, but I'm not mad about it, I preferred the frantic drum workouts of his older stuff, but that's irrelevant.

It's just interesting how history and context seem to influence people's tastes. Naturally I'm not talking about Joe for starting this thread though...
BLACK BOX & BOX CLEVER

Image
paulie wrote:Thinking >>>> everyone else on this forum.

User avatar
dubway
Admin
Posts: 3089
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 11:30 pm

Post by dubway » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:33 pm

ThinKing wrote:it seems that the vague dubstep connection still causes some excitement...

david_m
Posts: 659
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 9:03 pm
Location: A Corunha
Contact:

Post by david_m » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:46 pm

ThinKing wrote:tbh I don't really have an opinion on that - I like Shack's newer stuff alright, but I'm not mad about it, I preferred the frantic drum workouts of his older stuff, but that's irrelevant.

It's just interesting how history and context seem to influence people's tastes. Naturally I'm not talking about Joe for starting this thread though...
Yeh, I was overly excited when he said here that he was getting bored bored of the 140 tempo and was gonna try different things. Then I was overly dissapointed when he started doing straight 128 regular dubby techno...
I mean, fair play to him if that's what he's feeling, but I was expecting something entirely different.

All about that Dave Elvis remix though :lol:

bizmarc
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:26 am

Post by bizmarc » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:08 pm

I think his 'techno', as was the case with his 'dubstep', blows most of his contemporaries out of the water. You CAN NOT fuck with his drums.

concept_
Posts: 1421
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:19 am

Post by concept_ » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:13 pm

Bizmarc wrote:I think his 'techno', as was the case with his 'dubstep', blows most of his contemporaries out of the water. You CAN NOT fuck with his drums.
that's a pretty bold statement but your opinion

always nice to see shackleton shocking out at dmz/other raves. Him and appleblim are the only ones u ever see on a hype it seems.

gragy10
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 2:49 pm

Post by gragy10 » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:14 pm

ThinKing wrote:I preferred the frantic drum workouts of his older stuff, but that's irrelevant.
Agree 100% with this - I miss the Al Qaeda Recruitment Ad percussion bad..

User avatar
hopper
Posts: 1044
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:59 pm

Post by hopper » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:38 pm

ThinKing wrote:tbh I don't really have an opinion on that - I like Shack's newer stuff alright, but I'm not mad about it, I preferred the frantic drum workouts of his older stuff, but that's irrelevant.

It's just interesting how history and context seem to influence people's tastes. Naturally I'm not talking about Joe for starting this thread though...
I disagree with all the things posted here. Shackleton's new stuff is quite far separate from what else is happening in the realm of dubby techno with the exception of the Hustler remix. I think his new stuff, especially the Mary Anne Hobbs mix is a huge step up from all of his previous work. These new songs especially are a complete new realm of his own, and I think it's a bit harsh to reduce it to dubby techno. The music still has as much in common with dubstep as it does techno in many ways.

I think people should download his mix for Mary Anne Hobbs to hear how forward thinking Shack's new stuff is:
http://www.newmixes.com/mary_anne_hobbs ... -2008.html
It's just unbelievable, shivers down your spine music.

bizmarc
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:26 am

Post by bizmarc » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:51 pm

I disagree with all the things posted here. Shackleton's new stuff is quite far separate from what else is happening in the realm of dubby techno with the exception of the Hustler remix. I think his new stuff, especially the Mary Anne Hobbs mix is a huge step up from all of his previous work. These new songs especially are a complete new realm of his own, and I think it's a bit harsh to reduce it to dubby techno. The music still has as much in common with dubstep as it does techno in many ways.

I think people should download his mix for Mary Anne Hobbs to hear how forward thinking Shack's new stuff is:
http://www.newmixes.com/mary_anne_hobbs ... -2008.html
It's just unbelievable, shivers down your spine music.
Sorry this is what I was getting at too. I wasn't very clear. What I mean is that you don't have to like dub techno to like his new stuff cos it's so good it's on it's own level.

User avatar
joe muggs
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:47 pm
Location: Sydenham, baby!

Post by joe muggs » Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:09 pm

I don't get this "old stuff" "new stuff" thing... he's always been on a techno tip in his live sets... and actually the tracks on Skull010 are not techno at all, likewise his Reminiscin' remix! The only tracks where his quality dipped for me were that Crosstown Rebels release and the Simian Mobile Disco remix - those WERE too close to 'minimal' for me; otherwise everything I'm hearing is way out there.

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Post by fractal » Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:14 pm

skacks a don: old, new and next!

oh and i think the vague dubstep connection resonates deeply with the doesnt sound like everything else movement :P
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests