Ever wondered why the Big Apple logo is a banana?

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
User avatar
citizen
Posts: 658
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 2:23 pm

Ever wondered why the Big Apple logo is a banana?

Post by citizen » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:57 am

I do. It keeps me up at night.

Seriously, what is the story behind it? Perhaps those Croydon folk just have a heightened sense of humour?

User avatar
djshiva
Posts: 4933
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:13 pm
Location: aka sapphic_beats Indianaptizzle, IN USA
Contact:

Post by djshiva » Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:01 am

actually, i HAVE wondered this. probably says something about the extent of my boredom.
Last edited by djshiva on Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Here, have a free tune:
Soundcloud

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Post by fractal » Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:01 am

thats a good question!
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

deapoh
Posts: 3016
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 3:17 pm
Contact:

Post by deapoh » Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:35 am

:lol:

Is this serious? It's a juxtaposition. Laugh at it!!

Largin up N-Type, Hatcha, John, Skream, Artwork, Benga and the lot involved in Big Apple!
Image

User avatar
blizzardmusic
Posts: 4819
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 2:21 pm

Post by blizzardmusic » Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:55 am

lol. never thought of that.
Soundcloud
If you like jungle / drum and bass you'll like the above! ;)
diss04 wrote:
Pistonsbeneath wrote:no mention of blizzard?
who?
Facebook: facebook.com/blizzarddubs
Twitter: twitter.com/iamblizzard

User avatar
dubluke
Posts: 12839
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 12:15 am
Location: anyplace that would provide good shelter during a zombie invasion

Post by dubluke » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:08 pm

sorry to sound like a pretentious bastard but i think its being ironic, big up the big apple crew :D
gwa wrote:apparently i fell into the fridge and shouted really loudly 'RIGHT, IM OFF TO GO FUCK THE SHIT OUT OF ME LASS NOW MUM, SHUT YER DOOR'
"ketchup sounds for ketchup people"

jonnyrebel
Posts: 2092
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Lesta u slaaags
Contact:

Post by jonnyrebel » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:16 pm

ive wondered this too, it doesnt really make much sense. But then big banana records doesnt sound right does it...

User avatar
nesslei
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 am
Location: AOTEAROA >> LDN
Contact:

Post by nesslei » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:47 pm

big apple, split banana

the two go hand in hand don't they?

:wink:
Last edited by nesslei on Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
i'm takin this show on the road.

www.twitter.com/nesslei
http://www.youtube.com/nessleii - ya get me!


User avatar
juliun_c90
Posts: 1127
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 10:33 am
Location: Sheffield, UK

Post by juliun_c90 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:51 pm

confused me, but not as quickly as it should've done. took a while for me to notice, worryingly enough.

scoz
Posts: 326
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:26 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by scoz » Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:32 pm

They probably didn't consider it but Apple records (the beatles one) would probably have sued them, if they had used an apple as a logo. If not Apple Computers probably would have.

User avatar
prisoner
Posts: 1905
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: MPLS

Post by prisoner » Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:59 pm


User avatar
lomax
Posts: 787
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 7:40 pm
Location: Deptford and Whitechapel, London

Post by lomax » Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:54 am

Jonnyrebel wrote:ive wondered this too, it doesnt really make much sense. But then big banana records doesnt sound right does it...
haha

big banana records sounds heavy.

time to start my own label :D :D
Image

Think First!

User avatar
nesslei
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 am
Location: AOTEAROA >> LDN
Contact:

Post by nesslei » Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:00 am

scoz wrote:They probably didn't consider it but Apple records (the beatles one) would probably have sued them, if they had used an apple as a logo. If not Apple Computers probably would have.
yes to apple records having an intellectual property case against them for trademark infringement, no to apple computers.

under IP law, you can only be found guilty of trademark infringement if your business is clearly within the same industry as the claimant's. in other words, the similarity in logos must be shown to pose a competitive threat to the claimant's business.

ie music = yes, computers = no.


(i think that's maybe one of the only things i retained from my IP course at law school)
i'm takin this show on the road.

www.twitter.com/nesslei
http://www.youtube.com/nessleii - ya get me!

User avatar
test conditions
Posts: 277
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:07 pm

Post by test conditions » Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:19 am

nesslei wrote:
scoz wrote:They probably didn't consider it but Apple records (the beatles one) would probably have sued them, if they had used an apple as a logo. If not Apple Computers probably would have.
yes to apple records having an intellectual property case against them for trademark infringement, no to apple computers.

under IP law, you can only be found guilty of trademark infringement if your business is clearly within the same industry as the claimant's. in other words, the similarity in logos must be shown to pose a competitive threat to the claimant's business.

ie music = yes, computers = no.


(i think that's maybe one of the only things i retained from my IP course at law school)
But also now of course, Apple own itunes which complicates matters somewhat as they've entered the music industry which they had agreed with Apple Corp not to do many years ago...hence the Beatles' back- catalogue taking so long to be made available in itunes.

But mainly, bananas are cooler.

User avatar
nesslei
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 am
Location: AOTEAROA >> LDN
Contact:

Post by nesslei » Fri Aug 01, 2008 10:36 am

Test Conditions wrote:
nesslei wrote:
scoz wrote:They probably didn't consider it but Apple records (the beatles one) would probably have sued them, if they had used an apple as a logo. If not Apple Computers probably would have.
yes to apple records having an intellectual property case against them for trademark infringement, no to apple computers.

under IP law, you can only be found guilty of trademark infringement if your business is clearly within the same industry as the claimant's. in other words, the similarity in logos must be shown to pose a competitive threat to the claimant's business.

ie music = yes, computers = no.


(i think that's maybe one of the only things i retained from my IP course at law school)
But also now of course, Apple own itunes which complicates matters somewhat as they've entered the music industry which they had agreed with Apple Corp not to do many years ago...hence the Beatles' back- catalogue taking so long to be made available in itunes.

But mainly, bananas are cooler.
yes, i thought about the iTunes factor. definitely complicates matters...

intellectual property is actually a really interesting area of the law. if i practised it would definitely be in trademarks and patents.
i'm takin this show on the road.

www.twitter.com/nesslei
http://www.youtube.com/nessleii - ya get me!

skream
>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:23 pm
Location: In the weatherspoons
Contact:

Post by skream » Fri Aug 01, 2008 10:36 am

it was purely out of madness.....
the original guy who owned apple just said it would be funny...
no lawsuits envolved....

User avatar
goose
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 10:33 pm
Location: Earth

Post by goose » Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:14 am

Deapoh wrote::lol:

Is this serious? It's a juxtaposition. Laugh at it!!

Largin up N-Type, Hatcha, John, Skream, Artwork, Benga and the lot involved in Big Apple!
juxtaposition... good word!

flashharry
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 8:31 pm
Location: wivelsfield

Post by flashharry » Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:19 am

someone told me it meant 'MEN ONLY'

but ive yet to see evidence for or against this claim :? ?

skream
>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:23 pm
Location: In the weatherspoons
Contact:

Post by skream » Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:21 am

FlashHarry wrote:someone told me it meant 'MEN ONLY'

but ive yet to see evidence for or against this claim :? ?

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
thats a fence......
no trespassing.....
im so mash i find this funny!!!!!!!!

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests