3 times no?poax wrote:yeah, ive seen yung do it twice.

Randall beat us all by 12 years - rewound that mix back 3 times.poax wrote:im sure i saw young do that once.Spaceboy wrote:i'm lookin forward to when a dj buss's a big mix and has to rewind both tunes to get it going again.
progression nah?
well thats what i mean...pure energy mixes...makes for alot more interesting listening/viewing than just hearing tunes get rolled out end to end kinda ting...KION wrote:Randall beat us all by 12 years - rewound that mix back 3 times.poax wrote:im sure i saw young do that once.Spaceboy wrote:i'm lookin forward to when a dj buss's a big mix and has to rewind both tunes to get it going again.
progression nah?
But yeah - I def agree about dj-only refix / variations on forthcomings keeps it interesting and fresh in the dance - it's kinda done already as producers occasionally try things out or do exclusive fixes for different dj's, and also tweak / refix before outputting on a label.
maybe a good idea to shorten the distance between playin a track out and the release date..skream wrote:Im not blamin anyone i was just sayin that people are sayin that the've heard tunes too much by the time they get released!
this guy has a really good idea.if there is a sick new tune on the b side, people are gonna jump on it, even if they already have the A track on mp3.river wrote:
maybe a good idea to shorten the distance between playin a track out and the release date..
I mean, if the vibe and energy of a track is runnin... why not release it on mp3 straight away-- take advantage of that timeframe
then, as funds come in, release it on vinyl as well-- with something unheard on the flip-
perhaps its necessary to start thinking about innovative ways distribute, sell and promote these innovative beats
peace
Problem?? Sigh.David_M wrote:why is it the only one which has this dubplate problem??
so you expect a producer to not cut/play out/pass around his new tune just so that if/when it gets released, the few moany punters who go on about hearing a tune too much before its release won't harp on?David_M wrote:So, you wanna promote your tunes cause you want people to buy them right? so, why don't you start that promotion when the release date is close, so people can buy it when they really wanna buy it, not a year after?? I mean, you can do whatever you want with your music, but if you expect something from the crowd (like buying your tunes) you should care about them a little bit.
I've been thinking this for a while now. MP3 makes the music more accessible to more people and it really is no long ting to sort it out....unlike turning tracks into vinyl. It would definately be better for me as I am a new age 'Digital DJ' and rarely purchase vinyl unless I have to. Plus, 99p or two or three quid for a track is nothing really and it gives the customer the freedom to purchase the tracks they want instead of buying vinyl for the one track that they have to have plus another they are not as excited about for six or seven quid.I mean, if the vibe and energy of a track is runnin... why not release it on mp3 straight away-- take advantage of that timeframe
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests