do you want the truth

bellybelle · Post by **bellybelle** » Sat Sep 13, 2008 10:55 pm

Parson wrote:don't give me too much credit. i'm making a conscious effort to be gracious.

that's why i'm giving you credit. it can be harder at some points than others. and really inspiring to watch.

parson · Post by **parson** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:23 am

luv u kerri <3

bellybelle · Post by **bellybelle** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:30 am

Parson wrote:luv u kerri <3

awwww <3<3 Chris. you're a bit of alright yerself hehehe

phobang · Post by **phobang** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:22 am

Parson wrote:anyway, i'm not trying to convince you of anything. i'm just sharing what i believe.

and if you don't share that belief, i implore you to believe what you will.

That's fine, and I thank you for your graciousness in allowing me to use my own free will. However, I tend to point out snake oil salesmen when I see them.

parson · Post by **parson** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:28 am

point away

Pistonsbeneath · Post by **Pistonsbeneath** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:41 am

why don't you make some more tunes as good as big killaz?

nousd · Post by **nousd** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:44 am

bellybelle wrote:
Parson wrote:don't give me too much credit. i'm making a conscious effort to be gracious.
that's why i'm giving you credit.

It's very difficult not to appear arrogant
when I'm convinced that I know the truth
and easy to be aggressive
when others debunk me with "crass"
and uninformed opinions.
It's a lot easier now that
knowing the truth
is not so important as
being truthful...

...not that I claim to be truthful.
It's more fun to bullshit occasionally.

claw · Post by **claw** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:53 am

i think parson might be an alien...or work for the govt...not quite sure which

bellybelle · Post by **bellybelle** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:54 am

SD5 wrote:It's a lot easier now that
knowing the truth
is not so important as
being truthful...

i wish the two weren't exclusive....and that one automatically led to the other...

but there are people who commit murder every day knowing how wrong it is. it just got in the way of what they wanted and needed to be sacrificed. like when gas station attendants get killed because a crack addict needed a fix and didn't have the money. The knowledge of the Truth didn't save the attendant from the hazard of the addict at all.

it would be a wonderful thing for those two to be fused together, as if to know the Truth is to revolutionize the personal practice of it. but i think i have to relinquish hope in that like i do so many other puerile goals and aspirations.

its important to give credit when it is due. people are always so quick to capitalize on spreading animosity towards each other. how much more personally and globally edifying would it be to make the effort to praise instead of put down....

parson · Post by **parson** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:54 am

Piston wrote:why don't you make some more tunes as good as big killaz?

who says i'm not

black lotus · Post by **black lotus** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:08 am

parson, do you know walter russell?

also, ken wilber.

parson · Post by **parson** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:22 am

no, but a quick wiki check brings to mind this, which is brilliant stuff
http://www.realitysandwich.com/building_religion

stupid page has been off and on for a few weeks. if it doesn't load, try again later.

parson · Post by **parson** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:25 am

Walter Russell wrote:The idea was not that everyone would suddenly become a Christ, a Mozart, or an Einstein overnight. Rather, Bucke held that with each passing generation, more and more human beings will become routinely aware of their primary transcendent relationship to God, eternity, and the all-powerful creative source of the universe. Generations from now, Bucke believed, this level of enlightened, saint-like consciousness will be as common as rational self-awareness is now. In 1901, Bucke estimated that the number of individuals who have achieved this cosmically-conscious level of existence was extremely small, but he speculated that their numbers were increasing steadily.

Russell clearly knew what was up.

parson · Post by **parson** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:28 am

i'm not finding anything these guys are saying that goes against what colllier says

black lotus · Post by **black lotus** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:28 am

check out his book 'the secret of light'

parson · Post by **parson** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:29 am

did you know that light can carry genetic information

parson · Post by **parson** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:30 am

black lotus wrote:check out his book 'the secret of light'

what are the primary contentions of the book. if i start reading something and i already agree with everything it is trying to explain in a roundabout way, i usually won't finish it.

black lotus · Post by **black lotus** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:34 am

Parson wrote:
black lotus wrote:check out his book 'the secret of light'
what are the primary contentions of the book. if i start reading something and i already agree with everything it is trying to explain in a roundabout way, i usually won't finish it.

more about how it's worded. he talks about the universal one in detail.

nousd · Post by **nousd** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:07 am

Parson wrote:did you know that light can carry genetic information

Please explain.
Unless yr talking about movie projectors
displaying DNA profiles.

parson · Post by **parson** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:46 pm

SD5 wrote:
Parson wrote:did you know that light can carry genetic information
Please explain.
Unless yr talking about movie projectors
displaying DNA profiles.

i'm talking about what wilcock says in this project camelot interview

David Wilcock wrote: First of all we have Dr. Glen Rein, an American scientist who showed - he took placental DNA from a human placenta, put it in a test-tube and had people trained to create certain emotional states. They'd hold the test tube and they'd feel the greatest anger and rage you can imagine, or they'd feel the love of a mother for her newborn baby, the most pure, unconditional love.

What Dr. Rein found is that when you feel the love the DNA unwinds and when the helix unwinds, the messenger RNA can go in and grab the code, and build life, build healing, build the healing of your body, the healing of cancer, diabetes, whatever. The anger causes the DNA to knot up like a braid of hair, and then you can't get healing at all.

Now this is the kind of data that I went into great detail about in my MP3 series, 'The Science of Peace', which is available on my site, and that's where I went through all this with this man who won nine Grammys in music, and his name is Larry Seyer. We did a whole musical soundtrack for it. It's wonderful! I'm just giving you a little bitty taste of it right now.

But anyway, that proves on a microbiological level that DNA is an antenna for consciousness. It's tuned to the mind and to the soul.

Well, now you have to get into this guy, Dr. Peter Gariaev, who first conducted research called the DNA Phantom Effect. He found if you put DNA in a little room in which it can absorb light, all the light gets stuck in the DNA and spirals through the molecule. It doesn't stay in the room. The DNA is like a light sponge, which is really weird, right?

But then you take the DNA out of the tube and the light keeps on spiraling as if the DNA was still there holding it in place, but there is no DNA. Guess how long it stays like that? How long do you think? 30 days! For 30 days the DNA continues to act, even though it's not there anymore.

This is what we call a latent structure, a latent structuring effect. This is a common feature of what the Russians call torsion fields, which I get into great detail about in the 'Science of Peace' MP3 series on my website divinecosmos.com

Anyway, Gariaev went further than that, he took a frog embryo and a salamander embryo and took a non burning laser, and shines it through the salamander embryo, redirects the light into the frog embryo, all he's doing is beaming light into hermetically sealed containers, and what do you think happens?

Well, you don't really want to go there, but remember what we said about the Drosophilus, the fruit fly? The DNA code of the eye is taken out, and five generations later the eyes pop back on.

You have this plant and you make it mutate; standard laboratory plant, and 25% of the time the mutations heal. What do you think happens if you shine the energy of the salamander embryo into a frog embryo - just the light beam? The frog embryo completely re-tools itself 100% and becomes a salamander, and there is no genetic evidence of it ever having been a frog whatsoever.

transcript here:
http://projectcamelot.org/david_wilcock ... ipt_2.html

do you want the truth

Who is online