Testing your tracks?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- rustybridges
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 10:32 pm
Testing your tracks?
Iv been having a problem with how my tracks sound, when im making a sample im usualy listening to it on two 200W speakers, which sounds great, but i dont really have any bigger speakers to test my tracks on. Im abit weary to start giving out some of my tracks because im not to sure what there gonna sound like on a big system. Iv done ALOT of mastering in hopes ppl wont have to plug there ears and stop dancing when my lead hits haha. I was just wondering what other people do to test and master their tracks?[/i]
-
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:34 pm
- rustybridges
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 10:32 pm
Re: Testing your tracks?
i wouldnt do "ALOT" of anything in the mastering area... maybe a little limiting if you aren't gonna have it professionally mastered, just keep checking your mix on your monitors, car stereo, etc, and ask somebody you know that spins to put it on really early during the nightrustybridges wrote: Iv done ALOT of mastering in hopes ppl wont have to plug there ears and stop dancing when my lead hits haha. [/i]
your mix shouldn't be that off that people would plug their ears, if it is, even professional mastering wont help
And know that most consumer-level audio systems (car stereos, home systems, etc.) have a built in EQ curve that usually bumps up lows and highs, scooping a significant part of the mids out.
The reason monitors are helpful is that they don't have this EQ curve: in theory, the sound coming out of them is as "flat" or true, EQ-wise, as you can get.
The reason monitors are helpful is that they don't have this EQ curve: in theory, the sound coming out of them is as "flat" or true, EQ-wise, as you can get.
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:12 am
- Location: Chicago
wow...i do the SAME exact thing hahahaha, takes forever to get it just right, i've got 2 krk rp8's and i stole my dad's sub he uses for watching movies, but i can't ever get the sub-bass to sound right if i mix with that, i got to listen on my 2x12" in my car...days spent like thisSpire wrote:yeah, im so used to my cars system that thats what i base most of my tracks on. burn a copy, drive around the block a few times, fix what needs fixing, burn another copy.....repeat repeat. ive had really good results, but its not really a quick and effeicent way.

Sub monitors can be tricky: they can reproduce sub freqs that many commercial audio systems simply can't (especially anything with a mini-plug like iPods, etc.)...
BUT-
If you're mixing sub-heavy tracks like most of us here are, and your existing monitors aren't playing back the subs that are present in the mix, you're likely to keep boosting those subs until you can hear them -- and the problem here being that, like I said earlier, monitors are designed to have a "flat" freq response (nothing artificially boosted/cut) while a commercial audio device usually has a V-shaped EQ boost on the low & hight ends respectively -- so that once you've turned the bass up to a point where you can hear everything in your monitors, it's then going to get jacked way the fuck higher on the commercial audio device and turn the whole mix into mud.
So-
If you're not able to buy a sub monitor for a while, that's OK. Keep using your current monitors but also keep an eye on something like a spectral EQ or some other graphic EQ frequency analysis to make sure the whole mix is relatively even, without pronounced bumps/peaks/drop-outs across the whole freq range. In fact, take the highest quality recordings of some of your favorite tunes and watch them in a spectral EQ to get a feel for what it should look like.
BUT-
If you're mixing sub-heavy tracks like most of us here are, and your existing monitors aren't playing back the subs that are present in the mix, you're likely to keep boosting those subs until you can hear them -- and the problem here being that, like I said earlier, monitors are designed to have a "flat" freq response (nothing artificially boosted/cut) while a commercial audio device usually has a V-shaped EQ boost on the low & hight ends respectively -- so that once you've turned the bass up to a point where you can hear everything in your monitors, it's then going to get jacked way the fuck higher on the commercial audio device and turn the whole mix into mud.
So-
If you're not able to buy a sub monitor for a while, that's OK. Keep using your current monitors but also keep an eye on something like a spectral EQ or some other graphic EQ frequency analysis to make sure the whole mix is relatively even, without pronounced bumps/peaks/drop-outs across the whole freq range. In fact, take the highest quality recordings of some of your favorite tunes and watch them in a spectral EQ to get a feel for what it should look like.
- djshiva
- Posts: 4933
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:13 pm
- Location: aka sapphic_beats Indianaptizzle, IN USA
- Contact:
one thing i did before i had monitors, was test my tunes against other tunes i liked in a similar vein. i would test on studio headphones, crappy headphones, home hi fi stereos, shitty mono cd players, car stereos, you name it.
but i always used a comparison source, like mastered tunes in the same vein, to really hear what i was trying to accomplish.
also, if you have a friend who has cd decks or something at their house, with some decent speakers, dropping your new tunes alongside stuff you are used to playing/hearing has always been (for me, or i would imagine, most djs) the best way to really gauge if things sound even remotely good or not.
it really helped me develop an ear for what i was trying to do.
but i always used a comparison source, like mastered tunes in the same vein, to really hear what i was trying to accomplish.
also, if you have a friend who has cd decks or something at their house, with some decent speakers, dropping your new tunes alongside stuff you are used to playing/hearing has always been (for me, or i would imagine, most djs) the best way to really gauge if things sound even remotely good or not.
it really helped me develop an ear for what i was trying to do.
Here, have a free tune:
Soundcloud
Soundcloud
yeah ive got the Alesis mk2's, no sub, and also have 2x12" in my trunk, haha. polk gnx, got em on sale for $20 each, steal. then an alpine amp i got for 50% off. im such a cheapskate, i never buy anything unless its on sale.hubsmoke wrote:wow...i do the SAME exact thing hahahaha, takes forever to get it just right, i've got 2 krk rp8's and i stole my dad's sub he uses for watching movies, but i can't ever get the sub-bass to sound right if i mix with that, i got to listen on my 2x12" in my car...days spent like thisSpire wrote:yeah, im so used to my cars system that thats what i base most of my tracks on. burn a copy, drive around the block a few times, fix what needs fixing, burn another copy.....repeat repeat. ive had really good results, but its not really a quick and effeicent way.
thats a good one too.sapphic_beats wrote:also, if you have a friend who has cd decks or something at their house, with some decent speakers, dropping your new tunes alongside stuff you are used to playing/hearing has always been (for me, or i would imagine, most djs) the best way to really gauge if things sound even remotely good or not.
Totally! lol I get a lot strange looks running out the house in my Pjs, sitting in my car for 5 mins, then running back in...black lotus wrote:car test is obligatory
http://www.myspace.com/witnessdubz - Dubstep.
http://www.myspace.com/Insurgentghc - Hardcore.
http://www.myspace.com/theosp - Electro.
x54x
http://www.myspace.com/Insurgentghc - Hardcore.
http://www.myspace.com/theosp - Electro.
x54x
Snap, I only have half decent headphones and I keep testing my tracks on anything I can get hold ofsapphic_beats wrote:one thing i did before i had monitors, was test my tunes against other tunes i liked in a similar vein. i would test on studio headphones, crappy headphones, home hi fi stereos, shitty mono cd players, car stereos, you name it.
but i always used a comparison source, like mastered tunes in the same vein, to really hear what i was trying to accomplish.
also, if you have a friend who has cd decks or something at their house, with some decent speakers, dropping your new tunes alongside stuff you are used to playing/hearing has always been (for me, or i would imagine, most djs) the best way to really gauge if things sound even remotely good or not.
it really helped me develop an ear for what i was trying to do.
My sisters Hifi has never seen so much action
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests