Pitchfork 2008 End of Year round up...

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
geoff
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:52 am
Location: Manchester

Post by geoff » Fri Nov 07, 2008 4:39 pm

i don't think any of the artists involved refer to their music as wonky either

geoff
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:52 am
Location: Manchester

Post by geoff » Fri Nov 07, 2008 4:41 pm

pompende wrote:and as boring as a night of loef-a-likes is, if i listened to 2 hours of tunes using the same wonky synths and vocoders i would probably glass myself in the face.
the irony is that by labelling all this stuff under wonky it makes it more easier for this sound to attract copyists and therefore get rinsed

pompende
Posts: 2897
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:57 am
Location: 38104
Contact:

Post by pompende » Fri Nov 07, 2008 4:56 pm

yeah, that is my concern exactly.


also, i seem to have mistakenly created a hierarchy of badness with my syntax.

either extreme is equally bad imo.
brasco wrote:evolution via youtube tutorials
Image


blackdown
>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
Posts: 2351
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:46 pm
Location: LDN
Contact:

Post by blackdown » Fri Nov 07, 2008 5:16 pm

pompende wrote:i think the last thing this genre needs is to have interesting producers like that pushed into a different sub genre
ah it's no biggie. they have enough in common to warrant loose proximity in a paragraph of their own but still enough in common with the rest of the piece to be part of a "dubstep and grime" column. i have full faith in the artists involved that it will take a little bit more than an online paragraph shape to stop them being innovative, free thinking and creative.
Keysound Recordings, Rinse FM, http://www.blackdownsoundboy.blogspot.com, sub, edge, bars, groove, swing...

User avatar
noodles dpr recordings
Posts: 492
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 1:16 pm
Location: worldwide/london
Contact:

Post by noodles dpr recordings » Fri Nov 07, 2008 5:40 pm

pompende wrote:
hopper wrote:interesting how you class joker, ikonika, zomby, starkey and gemmy as wonky and not dubstep.
i think the last thing this genre needs is to have interesting producers like that pushed into a different sub genre.

and as boring as a night of loef-a-likes is, if i listened to 2 hours of tunes using the same wonky synths and vocoders i would probably glass myself in the face.
shit can't be that bad?? :roll:
Image
<b>SEND YOUR DEMOS HERE</b>
http://soundcloud.com/dpr/dropbox
<b>MP3 STORE</b> http://dpr.ithinkmusic.com

User avatar
diss04
Posts: 5727
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:47 pm
Location: Essex/London
Contact:

Post by diss04 » Fri Nov 07, 2008 8:17 pm

Blackdown wrote:
pompende wrote:i think the last thing this genre needs is to have interesting producers like that pushed into a different sub genre
ah it's no biggie. they have enough in common to warrant loose proximity in a paragraph of their own but still enough in common with the rest of the piece to be part of a "dubstep and grime" column. i have full faith in the artists involved that it will take a little bit more than an online paragraph shape to stop them being innovative, free thinking and creative.
well said.
Parson wrote:...and then God said unto Eve, "Have some of that, slag."

pompende
Posts: 2897
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:57 am
Location: 38104
Contact:

Post by pompende » Fri Nov 07, 2008 8:47 pm

first, no, it's not that bad. I actually quite like all of the artists in question. I am presuming that the same sound done with less finesse could be actively dis-enjoyable, however.

Blackdown wrote:
pompende wrote:i think the last thing this genre needs is to have interesting producers like that pushed into a different sub genre
ah it's no biggie. they have enough in common to warrant loose proximity in a paragraph of their own but still enough in common with the rest of the piece to be part of a "dubstep and grime" column. i have full faith in the artists involved that it will take a little bit more than an online paragraph shape to stop them being innovative, free thinking and creative.
right. i am thinking about peeps who read pitchfork on the regs tho. generally an overly-impressionable bunch.

it wouldn't be worrisome at all if I could think of more djs (like yourself and dusk) who blend these styles.

speaking of which, how nice would it be if kode started doing the fwd show again!
brasco wrote:evolution via youtube tutorials
Image

reptilian
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:46 am

Post by reptilian » Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:12 pm

this article seems overly negative and is quite divisive really

joker's dubstep/grime as far as most people are concerned

wonky? seriously what is this bullshit? thought this article was supposed to be about the year in grime and dubstep..

dont even get me started on what the fuck funky has to do with it...

:roll:

User avatar
ory
Posts: 1429
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 2:50 pm

Post by ory » Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:01 pm

the column should just be called "The Month In: 'Nuum-and-stuff-related-to-'nuum-but-not-really"

tony k
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 9:53 pm
Location: Vietnam, California.

Post by tony k » Sat Nov 08, 2008 1:42 am

why do the worst names for music genres come from UK journalists?


they are all suspect...

mirislav
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:05 am

Post by mirislav » Sat Nov 08, 2008 9:49 am

Not really understanding the blackdown criticism?! The pitchfork column is essential reading imo, or maybe that qualifies me as one of these 'overly impressionable' types!? In next months column, the 2009 top 10 :P

willis
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 11:48 am
Location: Hong Kong

Post by willis » Sat Nov 08, 2008 12:10 pm

fuck wonky

User avatar
dq
Posts: 1135
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: brooklyn, ny
Contact:

Post by dq » Sat Nov 08, 2008 12:21 pm

I would have liked to hear a mention of some of fine contributions this year in the full length album format. CD's by 2562, Scuba, Matty G, and Pinch to name a few explored the sound in a format not intended for club impact but which nonetheless brought a more reflective and thoughtful side to dubstep which was refreshing given all of the sudden hype last year.

User avatar
dq
Posts: 1135
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: brooklyn, ny
Contact:

Post by dq » Sat Nov 08, 2008 12:22 pm

Gotta big up Martin still for a solid thoughtful piece of writing. Really agreed with most of the picks.

reptilian
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:46 am

Post by reptilian » Sat Nov 08, 2008 2:50 pm

not sure i agree with the idea that the dancefloor smashing wobble tracks will necessarily lead to dubstep becoming purely "functional"

this implies that their only purpose might be to make people dance, rather than contain any innovative content. skream, coki and jakes tunes, amongst others, are wildly innovative sonically and structurally, even while some of their tracks are total dancefloor wreckers

its possible to be danceable and innovative - a recent distance set I witnessed at the west indian centre demonstrated this well with some real upbeat distorted stuff and more meditative tunes together

blackdown
>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
Posts: 2351
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:46 pm
Location: LDN
Contact:

Post by blackdown » Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:10 pm

dq wrote:I would have liked to hear a mention of some of fine contributions this year in the full length album format. CD's by 2562, Scuba, Matty G, and Pinch...
ello mr q. really enjoyed your set at dmz last night. :)

re your above points, I included the (excellent) Pinch album in my '07 round up. i covered the 2562 album this year but i didn't feel strongly enough to include it in the '08 "best of" column.

And i've not heard the Scuba or Matty G albums and have this minor rule of not recommending or writing about things i've not heard ;)

but out to all the album artists in dubstep and grime. stand up!
Keysound Recordings, Rinse FM, http://www.blackdownsoundboy.blogspot.com, sub, edge, bars, groove, swing...

User avatar
lightness
Posts: 126
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:38 am

Post by lightness » Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:11 pm

good article

gragy10
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 2:49 pm

Post by gragy10 » Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:12 am

Def a good article - thought it was nice to see the related sub-genres broken down like that. End of year list in November's a bit odd but sure that's Pitchfork's perogative.
On a related note it's kinda frustrating that there's not a couple more scene steeped writers out there with a Pitchfork sized platform at their disposal. Different journo's are always gonna be into different styles and artists and Martin's views on wobble are pretty well documented. It'd be interesting to see someone as clued up come back with a defence of wobble (which liek it or not is a huge part of the scene) beyond OMG!!!!!!! MASSIV DROP!!!!!!!
Be good to have a broader range of opinions out there, but that's hardly Martin's fault.
Editors, get on it..

mos dan
Posts: 1133
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: southside
Contact:

Post by mos dan » Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:40 am

big up blackdown as ever for pushing good music and sticking the knife (fork?) into the soulless, the retrograde, the sexless, the bludgeoning and the swingless. if you like all the music he doesn't and hate all the music he does then write yr own bloody column :P

('wobbleblogspot.com' would be hilarious actually, i'd love to see someone try and make the case for it convincingly)

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests