SCope13 wrote:
And yes, that wikipedia article really blows.
Well, why don't you change it to make it not blow? That's the beauty of Wikipedia -- if it is truly inaccurate and you know it to be so, then you can do something about it fairly easily. Why not help the world understand what dubstep actually is?
If this is the future, it seems highly livable: shiny, cool and comfortably dissonant. Like a low dose of ketamine in an empty, luminous airport hall in northern Japan, eating avocado and waiting for the universe to arrive.
I'm really feeling this one Clarence Thomas tune, it's called Judgement
If this is the future, it seems highly livable: shiny, cool and comfortably dissonant. Like a low dose of ketamine in an empty, luminous airport hall in northern Japan, eating avocado and waiting for the universe to arrive.
DiegoSapiens wrote:newcomers think that in here we all listen to brostep, and they come like like revolutionaries saying HEY GUYS! THERE IS A CHILLED DUBSTEP!
Shows how vital this forum is to the proper dubstep culture
I liked the Wikipedia article on dubstep...I know some peoe have a problem with it because it makes some dumb statements, but overall I'd say it was quite informative and in this day and age when all the brosteppers will probably look at the Wikipedia page on dubstep and find all the stuff about its roots, I think it's a great resource.
"The idea is to remain in a state of constant departure while always arriving."
-Waking Life