Dubstepforum.com

contakt321 wrote:

mondays child wrote:I'm not hating

Why not?

I AM HATING

Screw this pathetic loser. He deserves to be hated on.

futurist wrote:

kate... wrote:there's files in my quarantine box that say otherwise.
Bloodhound.Exploit.292

Here is some info on that:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/en ... 18-2428-99

This is not my doing and its not on my server.

Page Source:
http://pastebin.org/249096

kate... wrote:

futurist wrote:

kate... wrote:there's files in my quarantine box that say otherwise.
Bloodhound.Exploit.292

Here is some info on that:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/en ... 18-2428-99

This is not my doing and its not on my server.

Page Source:
http://pastebin.org/249096

dude I have Google, thanks. your site tried to install malware on my work pc. thats all there is to it.

edit: yes, I have Java installed, and no I wont click links provided by someone I specifically distrust.

futurist wrote:

kate... wrote:

futurist wrote:

kate... wrote:there's files in my quarantine box that say otherwise.
Bloodhound.Exploit.292

Here is some info on that:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/en ... 18-2428-99

This is not my doing and its not on my server.

Page Source:
http://pastebin.org/249096

dude I have Google, thanks. your site tried to install malware on my work pc. thats all there is to it.

edit: yes, I have Java installed, and no I wont click links provided by someone I specifically distrust.

w/e the hate will just keep coming so there's no point in me saying anything. i will once again apologize even though it doesnt matter because this is the internet and apologies dont mean anything here but yes i do apologize.

cosmic surgeon wrote:To the people spamming his friends list, don't be homophobe. there's no need to bother other people who've not done anything.

futurist wrote:w/e the hate will just keep coming so there's no point in me saying anything. i will once again apologize even though it doesnt matter because this is the internet and apologies dont mean anything here but yes i do apologize.

cosmic surgeon wrote:To the people spamming his friends list, don't be pricks there's no need to bother other people who've not done anything.

Witnessdub wrote:

cosmic surgeon wrote:To the people spamming his friends list, don't be homophobe. there's no need to bother other people who've not done anything.

nice choice of words. your mother must be so proud.

jolly wailer wrote:"I said I'm sorry it won't happen again"


bro, no one trusts you, why should we ... fuck off back to the studio, because your own "original" tunes are going to need some work considering the calibre of productions you've been stealing and passing off as your own work


That's like an Italian restaurant building up its clientèle with delicious food and then substituting its sauce with ketchup and hoping no one would notice



worst promotion strategy ever

futurist wrote:
its not going to happen again. now for the people who are lower them selves below me and spamming people on my person friends list I will take action against that. I made no money from someone elses work nor did i ruin anyones life. i took everything down, I apologized.

Witnessdub wrote:so glad that everyone caught this kid. a while back i caught him trying to rip oFF giants drumstick. i contacted him and he took it down. very recently i caught him trying to rip oFF giants drumstick vip and a couple other huge tunes. i told all the record companys and artist he was stealing From. he took them down then contacted me told that some else managed his myspace and sound cloud and that he was pissed at this person For putting those up and he had nothing to do with it. then he blocked me. so glad you got caught. i hope no one lets this kid forgot about this shit. what a twat.

cosmic surgeon wrote:p.p.s. just so there's no "homophobe" sentiments taken from the statement. Words have several meanings, first of all, and their meanings are dependent on the context they're uttered in. If you really think I was saying it is homosexual to spam people on this guy's friends list, then just lol. Words don't have static meanings and change all the time. The contexts in which I learned to use that word were not homophobic contexts, and so therefore I do not use the word in a homophobic context. There was no "gay bashing" sentiment whatsoever - it didn't even cross my mind.

My apologies if you got offended.

djshiva wrote:

cosmic surgeon wrote:p.p.s. just so there's no "homophobe" sentiments taken from the statement. Words have several meanings, first of all, and their meanings are dependent on the context they're uttered in. If you really think I was saying it is homosexual to spam people on this guy's friends list, then just lol. Words don't have static meanings and change all the time. The contexts in which I learned to use that word were not homophobic contexts, and so therefore I do not use the word in a homophobic context. There was no "gay bashing" sentiment whatsoever - it didn't even cross my mind.

My apologies if you got offended.

Not because I want a big long argument, but because it bears saying: it's easy to say "it's just a word", but we all know that words DO have meaning, and more importantly, intent. And while words may not have static meanings, there are certain words in our vocabulary that are used with INTENT to demean, dismiss and/or dehumanize. The definitions may change, but the intent is still very much there, and very hard to dissassociate from the word. In other words, "gay bashing" may not have even crossed your mind, but your "non-gaybashing" definition doesn't mean much before the overall cultural connotation of using the word.

I don't think everyone who says shit like that is inherently a homophobe, but if you've spent your life hearing that kinda shit aimed at you...trust me...it makes me grit my teeth and wanna smack the shit out of everyone who uses it.

djshiva wrote:

cosmic surgeon wrote:p.p.s. just so there's no "homophobe" sentiments taken from the statement. Words have several meanings, first of all, and their meanings are dependent on the context they're uttered in. If you really think I was saying it is homosexual to spam people on this guy's friends list, then just lol. Words don't have static meanings and change all the time. The contexts in which I learned to use that word were not homophobic contexts, and so therefore I do not use the word in a homophobic context. There was no "gay bashing" sentiment whatsoever - it didn't even cross my mind.

My apologies if you got offended.

Not because I want a big long argument, but because it bears saying: it's easy to say "it's just a word", but we all know that words DO have meaning, and more importantly, intent. And while words may not have static meanings, there are certain words in our vocabulary that are used with INTENT to demean, dismiss and/or dehumanize. The definitions may change, but the intent is still very much there, and very hard to dissassociate from the word. In other words, "gay bashing" may not have even crossed your mind, but your "non-gaybashing" definition doesn't mean much before the overall cultural connotation of using the word.

I don't think everyone who says shit like that is inherently a homophobe, but if you've spent your life hearing that kinda shit aimed at you...trust me...it makes me grit my teeth and wanna smack the shit out of everyone who uses it.

pkay wrote:

futurist wrote:
its not going to happen again. now for the people who are lower them selves below me and spamming people on my person friends list I will take action against that. I made no money from someone elses work nor did i ruin anyones life. i took everything down, I apologized.

Should just post your personal info on 4chan and let the anons have some fun with you.

You may not have ruined anyones life but you sure as fuck ruined any chance of you doing anything in the dubstep scene.

cosmic surgeon wrote:

djshiva wrote:

cosmic surgeon wrote:p.p.s. just so there's no "homophobe" sentiments taken from the statement. Words have several meanings, first of all, and their meanings are dependent on the context they're uttered in. If you really think I was saying it is homosexual to spam people on this guy's friends list, then just lol. Words don't have static meanings and change all the time. The contexts in which I learned to use that word were not homophobic contexts, and so therefore I do not use the word in a homophobic context. There was no "gay bashing" sentiment whatsoever - it didn't even cross my mind.

My apologies if you got offended.

Not because I want a big long argument, but because it bears saying: it's easy to say "it's just a word", but we all know that words DO have meaning, and more importantly, intent. And while words may not have static meanings, there are certain words in our vocabulary that are used with INTENT to demean, dismiss and/or dehumanize. The definitions may change, but the intent is still very much there, and very hard to dissassociate from the word. In other words, "gay bashing" may not have even crossed your mind, but your "non-gaybashing" definition doesn't mean much before the overall cultural connotation of using the word.

I don't think everyone who says shit like that is inherently a homophobe, but if you've spent your life hearing that kinda shit aimed at you...trust me...it makes me grit my teeth and wanna smack the shit out of everyone who uses it.

I understand your frustration, but I had hoped that it would be received and thus understand with the contextually grounded significance which I had intended. Those types of word may be used (by some) with the intent to demean yeah, but what better thing could you do to detract the power of that word to demean than to use it in a different way and lend it a different meaning? Words only have significance in the context of a "language game" with rules and such that are agreed to by all parties playing that particular language game. If I'm not playing the language game where "homophobe." is a derogatory term for a homosexual person, then any intentionality (which is what we find fault with, not abstract sounds, but their relation to the speaker and their intentions) which could have fault found with it doesn't exist.

I'd even argue that the word in its contemporary usage is far removed from the original homophobic connotation, and that it will eventually entirely cease to become a slur, just as it has ceased to denote bundles of sticks and certain pork products.

But yeah like I said, my apologies if anyone was offended. Wasn't my intention to do so.