Trance

Electric_Head · Post by **Electric_Head** » Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:44 am

d-T-r wrote:music taste = subjective

all music is related anyway. Put your time and energy into mixing , making or listening to some tunes you do enjoy instead of talking about music you don't like. Everyone's better off that way

It`s more fun getting a rise out of Bringer

leyenda · Post by **leyenda** » Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:56 am

Electric_Head wrote:
d-T-r wrote:music taste = subjective

all music is related anyway. Put your time and energy into mixing , making or listening to some tunes you do enjoy instead of talking about music you don't like. Everyone's better off that way
It`s more fun getting a rise out of Bringer

It's not just getting a rise though. Tiesto definitely is shit.

capo ultra · Post by **capo ultra** » Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:06 am

someone kill this thread. Trance has always been and will always be shit.

Ricky_Spanish · Post by **Ricky_Spanish** » Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:17 pm

capo ultra wrote:someone kill this thread. Trance has always been and will always be shit.

hi retard. Bye retard.

BNanni · Post by **BNanni** » Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:18 pm

No need.

pikeymobile · Post by **pikeymobile** » Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:19 pm

hey bringer do u wear stonewashed jeans

mashmash · Post by **mashmash** » Mon Feb 13, 2012 1:17 am

lol at this thread. like the historical equivalent of dubstep vs brostep

I quite like some trance. I've got a few global underground mix compilations, but a lot of stuff on there comes under the progressive house bracket as well i suppose. i find good trance to be pretty emotional music, i get the goosbump effect with some tunes. I mean how can you NOT get goosebumps when the chord progression in cafe del mar by energy 52 kicks in? it's a pretty vast genre i barely know anything about it but these are some of the tunes i like.

SCope13 · Post by **SCope13** » Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:15 pm

pikeymobile wrote:hey bringer do u wear stonewashed jeans

And yeah, I think there's a lot of shitty trance, but then theres stuff like Hallucinogen's Twisted...

SCope13 · Post by **SCope13** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:08 am

Bump because a) I'm in the mood for some dark trance and b) lulz.

Mammoth · Post by **Mammoth** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:50 am

Where does trance get the bad rep?

AxeD · Post by **AxeD** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:08 am

Mammoth wrote:Where does trance get the bad rep?

From being awful for years.

Mammoth · Post by **Mammoth** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:17 am

AxeD wrote:
Mammoth wrote:Where does trance get the bad rep?
From being awful for years.

Derrr

RandomEyez · Post by **RandomEyez** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:52 pm

Used to love a bit of trance back in the day. In my opinion the progressive side of things was where the real quality was at...

But even the fluffy stuff had it's moments

Unfortunately Bringer isn't really bringing the best pro-Trance argument to the table with the tracks he's posted (and some may say the same about mine) The earlier stuff was far more inspired, when songs each had a lot of character, something that the stuff still being churned out these days is severely lacking in.

So i'd say trance isn't shit....but most of it is.

Killamike49 · Post by **Killamike49** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:26 pm

I like the euphoric stuff from the 90s, and stuff that sounds like it, but teisto is ez-cheeze.
He learned what an arpeggiator is and called it a day. Not to mention i do not like 130 4x4 gay shit, but that's just me.

Ricky_Spanish · Post by **Ricky_Spanish** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:39 pm

Random Eyez wrote:Used to love a bit of trance back in the day. In my opinion the progressive side of things was where the real quality was at...

Unfortunately Bringer isn't really bringing the best pro-Trance argument to the table with the tracks he's posted (and some may say the same about mine) The earlier stuff was far more inspired, when songs each had a lot of character, something that the stuff still being churned out these days is severely lacking in.

So i'd say trance isn't shit....but most of it is.

Most of any genre is shit. If you haven't got the patience or the intelligence to seek out the cream, then that's your problem. Which is what i said on the 1st page.

Your idea of trance is at least about 10+ years old. FYI it changes every year. The tracks I posted were tracks specifically to make a point about quality, not about pandering to these particular forum denizens, ie old skool/minimal.

To refute your point about lack of quality or character for modern Trance (ill limit myself to 1):

(Allthough thats a non-point: for the most part, character is directly proportional to how far back in time it was created. When I remember listening to trance 15-20 years ago I didn't imbue it then with the character that I do now, that's' psychology, not objective musical descriptor).

I organise my Trance collection in the moods that they inspire, other genres have different moods and similar ones. We listen to music for the way it makes us feel, how is one mood or feeling better than another?

fassyman · Post by **fassyman** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:09 pm

^ listened 3 of those tunes at random, they were all shit. especially the first one.

trance is such a snoozefest. worst genre in electronic music imo.

pikeymobile · Post by **pikeymobile** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:12 pm

did i make him leave the forum or does he still post?

MasterA · Post by **MasterA** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:34 pm

I know one guy who likes trance. he's a tnuc.

alphacat · Post by **alphacat** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:39 pm

Trance: because if you're high enough, watching some dude tweak the res knob on his synthesizer for hours on end is about all you can manage.

Unwashed people having tantric sex in the middle of the dancefloor... not something you need to see more than once.

wobbles · Post by **wobbles** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:58 pm

if this is trance then i like trance,

Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Re: Trance

Who is online