Burnt bails

magma · Post by **magma** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:15 pm

SD5 wrote:we've got you where we want you

Haha.... well, the pitch is cutting up to fuck, so I think if anyone's expecting a repeat of the First Innings from England, they'll be sadly disappointed. It's (going to be) a hell of a match.

nousd · Post by **nousd** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:21 pm

^true
but we're gunna look pretty incompetent if you get 200 in second innings

BLZDub · Post by **BLZDub** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:36 pm

Inserting penis into bumhole of Australian cricket.

LEQ · Post by **LEQ** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:44 pm

On the one hand, amazing, on the other hand, MY TICKET FOR MONDAY IS NOW FUCKED.

magma · Post by **magma** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:56 pm

LEQ wrote:On the one hand, amazing, on the other hand, MY TICKET FOR MONDAY IS NOW FUCKED.

You need to pray for a very specific amount of rain, I think.

magma · Post by **magma** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:05 pm

WICKET! Clark 6 c b Swann (47th over: Australia 143-9 (Siddle 14)
That's a truly terrible decision. Clark is given out caught to a ball that missed his bat by a full six inches and more, thumping straight into his pad and looping to short leg. Disgraceful umpiring, to be frank. Amazing how the breaks go against you in the bad times.

Feel for you on that one, boys.

magma · Post by **magma** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:27 pm

Give us your worst, lads!

I predict I'm going to be the only one updating this thread now... you've all gone home to actually watch it haven't you? Fucking late shift....

triptych · Post by **triptych** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:50 pm

250 we want here at least.

Pi-Krust · Post by **Pi-Krust** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:51 pm

Magma wrote:Give us your worst, lads!

I predict I'm going to be the only one updating this thread now... you've all gone home to actually watch it haven't you? Fucking late shift....

Fucking Hell I'm actually enjoying watching cricket

,I'll never be allowed back into Scotland again

.

magma · Post by **magma** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:59 pm

Triptych wrote:250 we want here at least.

200 will do it, I reckon. Lead of 372 would be unassailable on this pitch and we don't want to eat up too much time... need to leave ourselves enough room for a nice game of skittles and a couple of rain breaks... not a time to get greedy, IMHO!

LEQ · Post by **LEQ** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:16 pm

Magma wrote:
Triptych wrote:250 we want here at least.
200 will do it, I reckon. Lead of 372 would be unassailable on this pitch and we don't want to eat up too much time... need to leave ourselves enough room for a nice game of skittles and a couple of rain breaks... not a time to get greedy, IMHO!

Yes please, rain breaks in particular.

triptych · Post by **triptych** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:19 pm

Magma wrote:
Triptych wrote:250 we want here at least.
200 will do it, I reckon. Lead of 372 would be unassailable on this pitch and we don't want to eat up too much time... need to leave ourselves enough room for a nice game of skittles and a couple of rain breaks... not a time to get greedy, IMHO!

I said when we got the aussies out we'd lose 2 wickets before close of play, fingers crossed I was wrong. Half way there.

I'd like to see us finishing about this time tomorrow, maybe at tea, gives us enough time to get them out, but doesn't give them enough time to win.

magma · Post by **magma** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:22 pm

Triptych wrote:
Magma wrote:
Triptych wrote:250 we want here at least.
200 will do it, I reckon. Lead of 372 would be unassailable on this pitch and we don't want to eat up too much time... need to leave ourselves enough room for a nice game of skittles and a couple of rain breaks... not a time to get greedy, IMHO!
I said when we got the aussies out we'd lose 2 wickets before close of play, fingers crossed I was wrong. Half way there.

I'd like to see us finishing about this time tomorrow, maybe at tea, gives us enough time to get them out, but doesn't give them enough time to win.

I'd take that.

Not a great match for Cook with the bat. Shame.... I can't help but think runrate is what they should be aiming for here...

triptych · Post by **triptych** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:24 pm

Magma wrote:
Triptych wrote:
Magma wrote:
Triptych wrote:250 we want here at least.
200 will do it, I reckon. Lead of 372 would be unassailable on this pitch and we don't want to eat up too much time... need to leave ourselves enough room for a nice game of skittles and a couple of rain breaks... not a time to get greedy, IMHO!
I said when we got the aussies out we'd lose 2 wickets before close of play, fingers crossed I was wrong. Half way there.

I'd like to see us finishing about this time tomorrow, maybe at tea, gives us enough time to get them out, but doesn't give them enough time to win.
I'd take that.

Not a great match for Cook with the bat. Shame.... I can't help but think runrate is what they should be aiming for here...

Course it is, with the way the pitch is heading. Let's get Bopara back, he could slog 30 in 4 overs

magma · Post by **magma** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:27 pm

Triptych wrote:
Magma wrote:
Triptych wrote:
Magma wrote:
Triptych wrote:250 we want here at least.
200 will do it, I reckon. Lead of 372 would be unassailable on this pitch and we don't want to eat up too much time... need to leave ourselves enough room for a nice game of skittles and a couple of rain breaks... not a time to get greedy, IMHO!
I said when we got the aussies out we'd lose 2 wickets before close of play, fingers crossed I was wrong. Half way there.

I'd like to see us finishing about this time tomorrow, maybe at tea, gives us enough time to get them out, but doesn't give them enough time to win.
I'd take that.

Not a great match for Cook with the bat. Shame.... I can't help but think runrate is what they should be aiming for here...
Course it is, with the way the pitch is heading. Let's get Bopara back, he could slog 30 in 4 overs

Work out a way to stick Pietersen in while your at it, we'll be all out by lunch tomorrow, but we'll have our lead!

triptych · Post by **triptych** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:32 pm

Would you put your money on a win yet then?

I think I would.

LEQ · Post by **LEQ** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:34 pm

Fuck.

triptych · Post by **triptych** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:35 pm

Can I take that back?

magma · Post by **magma** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:41 pm

Magma wrote:
SD5 wrote:we've got you where we want you

Haha.... well, the pitch is cutting up to fuck, so I think if anyone's expecting a repeat of the First Innings from England, they'll be sadly disappointed. It's (going to be) a hell of a match.

I'm not betting on anything until tomorrow tea time!!

magma · Post by **magma** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:42 pm

If they can get us out for under 200 then it's ON like fucking Babylon....

LOCKED for the weekend!

Burnt bails

Who is online