London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Locked
User avatar
Forum
Posts: 10686
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:55 am
Location: J R Hartley

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by Forum » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:35 pm

Every kid in Jamaica right now is going to want to be a sprinter, expect them to dominate for a long time
Image Image

User avatar
hugh
Posts: 4164
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:00 pm
Contact:

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by hugh » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:37 pm

ehbrums1 wrote:That's not after example, Jamaica is extremely shady in their doping regulations
What? That has nothing to do with what we are talking about (plus it is controversial for many reasons). Can't help but feel you are clutching at straws there.
Lost Dreams - Final
Soundcloud
Ipso Facto - Final
Soundcloud

User avatar
ehbes
Posts: 19109
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 2:34 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by ehbes » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:38 pm

No your trying to give an example for why they were dominant in sprinting and not other events, and all I'm saying is that they've been known to be pretty relaxed on the regulations
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.

User avatar
hugh
Posts: 4164
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:00 pm
Contact:

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by hugh » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:41 pm

ehbrums1 wrote:No your trying to give an example for why they were dominant in sprinting and not other events, and all I'm saying is that they've been known to be pretty relaxed on the regulations
And I'm saying that's awful rationalisation. And you don't think practically every sprinter in the world at some point takes some form of performance enhancer?
Anyway, like I say, that is poor reasoning. They are dominant because every kid wants to grow up as a sprinter in the same way every kid wants to grow up to be a footballer in the UK.
Lost Dreams - Final
Soundcloud
Ipso Facto - Final
Soundcloud

User avatar
Hedley King
Posts: 281
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:56 pm
Contact:

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by Hedley King » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:41 pm

ehbrums1 wrote:US 104 medals....
Yeah but the point people are making is that population and funding are the main factors rather than some inherent athletic superiority or sexual equality in the USA that doesn't exist elsewhere (only just over half the USA medals were from women- and about half of the olympic medals go to women so it isn't anything that surprising what they did).

USA population 311 million: 104 medals....if there was some weird NW Europe combined team of UK, France and Germany it'd have population 210 million and 142 medals.....I'm sure people could go on with those sort of stats all over the place, USA women did very well, but to say that they are leaps and bounds ahead of the rest of the world because of some equality law seems a bit far fetched.

User avatar
hugh
Posts: 4164
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:00 pm
Contact:

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by hugh » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:42 pm

Hedley King wrote:
ehbrums1 wrote:US 104 medals....
Yeah but the point people are making is that population and funding are the main factors rather than some inherent athletic superiority or sexual equality in the USA that doesn't exist elsewhere (only just over half the USA medals were from women- and about half of the olympic medals go to women so it isn't anything that surprising what they did).

USA population 311 million: 104 medals....if there was some weird NW Europe combined team of UK, France and Germany it'd have population 210 million and 142 medals.....I'm sure people could go on with those sort of stats all over the place, USA women did very well, but to say that they are leaps and bounds ahead of the rest of the world because of some equality law seems a bit far fetched.
pkay is talking about a difference in culture more than anything else. He certainly isn't talking about inherent athletic superiority.
*edit, misread post
Lost Dreams - Final
Soundcloud
Ipso Facto - Final
Soundcloud

User avatar
Hedley King
Posts: 281
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:56 pm
Contact:

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by Hedley King » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:47 pm

hugh wrote:
Hedley King wrote:
ehbrums1 wrote:US 104 medals....
Yeah but the point people are making is that population and funding are the main factors rather than some inherent athletic superiority or sexual equality in the USA that doesn't exist elsewhere (only just over half the USA medals were from women- and about half of the olympic medals go to women so it isn't anything that surprising what they did).

USA population 311 million: 104 medals....if there was some weird NW Europe combined team of UK, France and Germany it'd have population 210 million and 142 medals.....I'm sure people could go on with those sort of stats all over the place, USA women did very well, but to say that they are leaps and bounds ahead of the rest of the world because of some equality law seems a bit far fetched.
pkay is talking about a difference in culture more than anything else. He certainly isn't talking about inherent athletic superiority. I think you misunderstand him.
No, I get that- mostly I was taking it that he says some US equality law is the reason USA women do so well, I'm saying that they don't do so especially well and that there are loads of other factors, and most of the western world has similar equality laws

Molzie
Posts: 7566
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:09 am
Location: CHCH, NZ

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by Molzie » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:51 pm

hugh wrote:How do you explain Jamaica winning so many track and field events? Answer > They invest a lot in track in field compared to other sports because sprinting is their national sport.
I highly doubt Jamaica has the same sort of funding as the US do for their runners. you guys are seriously deluded.

User avatar
Sexual_Chocolate
Posts: 17019
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:57 pm
Location: Label A City

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by Sexual_Chocolate » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:57 pm

Molzie wrote:
hugh wrote:How do you explain Jamaica winning so many track and field events? Answer > They invest a lot in track in field compared to other sports because sprinting is their national sport.
I highly doubt Jamaica has the same sort of funding as the US do for their runners. you guys are seriously deluded.
there is a serious amount of money put into running in Jamaica... but its ONLY for the people at the very top eg Bolt.
Laszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
Soundcloud
https://labelarecs.bandcamp.com

User avatar
hugh
Posts: 4164
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:00 pm
Contact:

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by hugh » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:58 pm

Molzie wrote:
hugh wrote:How do you explain Jamaica winning so many track and field events? Answer > They invest a lot in track in field compared to other sports because sprinting is their national sport.
I highly doubt Jamaica has the same sort of funding as the US do for their runners. you guys are seriously deluded.
I am saying it is a combination of culture and funding. If a sport is highly popular and highly funded in any given country in relativity to any other country then they will certainly achieve more in that sport than the other country. There's no delusion here, gtfo with that bull.

And let's not forget a lot of funding comes from sponsorships. I don't think you realise just how much funding Bolt, Blake and co get.
Lost Dreams - Final
Soundcloud
Ipso Facto - Final
Soundcloud

Molzie
Posts: 7566
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:09 am
Location: CHCH, NZ

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by Molzie » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:01 pm

hugh wrote:And let's not forget a lot of funding comes from sponsorships. I don't think you realise just how much funding Bolt, Blake and co get.
true that.

User avatar
hugh
Posts: 4164
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:00 pm
Contact:

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by hugh » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:09 pm

Furthermore, it's not like cos Jamaica is such a poor nation that literally everything they do is from the bottom of the barrel. I can't help but feel there's a tad of ignorance/racism wrapped up in those negative assumptions but its too awkward to unravel.
Lost Dreams - Final
Soundcloud
Ipso Facto - Final
Soundcloud

User avatar
ehbes
Posts: 19109
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 2:34 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by ehbes » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:16 pm

And potentially steroids
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.

User avatar
Hedley King
Posts: 281
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:56 pm
Contact:

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by Hedley King » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:18 pm

ehbrums1 wrote:And potentially steroids
What about IOC independently testing all olympic medal winners?

Molzie
Posts: 7566
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:09 am
Location: CHCH, NZ

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by Molzie » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:19 pm

hugh wrote:I can't help but feel there's a tad of ignorance/racism wrapped up in those negative assumptions but its too awkward to unravel.
wut?

User avatar
ehbes
Posts: 19109
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 2:34 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by ehbes » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:19 pm

They would have to do that through each country's system
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.

User avatar
Forum
Posts: 10686
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:55 am
Location: J R Hartley

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by Forum » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:20 pm

I assume you were disgusted when Gatlin won a medal?
Image Image

User avatar
Hedley King
Posts: 281
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:56 pm
Contact:

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by Hedley King » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:20 pm

ehbrums1 wrote:They would have to do that through each country's system

that isnt how it works

User avatar
ehbes
Posts: 19109
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 2:34 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by ehbes » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:22 pm

Then explain how athletes are losing their medals only after the Olympics, instead of not being allowed in at all
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.

Perej
Posts: 795
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:35 am
Location: West London

Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread

Post by Perej » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:39 pm

ehbrums1 wrote:US 104 medals....
Cos of the size of your country and nature of the education system you lot have.... no other reasons.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests