Kode9 : portrait of the artist as a... writer
If there is anyone who wishes to think - or explore - paradigms outside the tradition of Western Philosohpy I would recommend Emmanuel Levinas.
Although extremely dense and hard to penetrate, it is incredible.
Although extremely dense and hard to penetrate, it is incredible.
Last edited by djslate on Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SOON COME:
2-Step Origins Mixtape
Pure Wookie Vol. 1
Pure Zed Bias Vol. 1
2-Step Origins Mixtape
Pure Wookie Vol. 1
Pure Zed Bias Vol. 1
I don't think that is very outside the Tradition of Western PhilosophyDjslate wrote:If there is anyone who wishes to think - or explore - paradigms outside the tradition of Western Philosohpy I would recommend Emmanuel Levinas.
Although extremely dense and hard to penetrate, it is incredible.
Epithet try not to be small minded, they develop really good answers to the question about moral frameworks you are asking. I don't know much about philosophy from other cultures let alone Oceanic ones, philosophy isn't really my field either, but I suspect that the very questions you are asking are framed by Western modes of thinking and really I would only want to be interested in other cultures for their own sake and not as a form of pseudo self-debasement which is actually probably a form of self-aggrandisement in trying to take some kind moral highground. Peace.
Not so much small minded bribkin, just looking to find something that is culturally relevent to who and where i am. I'm polynesian living in NZ. Maybe if i was euro/amero and living there i'd care more about that stuff but i'm not, so i dont. I guess I'm trying to open others minds to thinking outside their own culturally conditioned philosophical box while getting some pointers relative to mine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativism
Thanks for the pointer to Levinas Slate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativism
Thanks for the pointer to Levinas Slate.
lol I don't need an introduction to Levinas safe though. The foundation of his thinking is Judaism though so it depends where you think that fits into western philosophy.
What I am saying is that by in calling cultures that aren't yours 'other', then you are starting from a framework where your interest in them is such, as 'other', which essentially means you are still thinking about them from a western centred position. get me.
I don't think that makes philosophies like Levinas invaluable, I just think that all this talk about 'other' has been going on for most of a century now and people get all excited about studying 'the other' in a way that is kind of weirdly voyeuristic and starts to make you wonder about the psychology of it.....
safe epithet tho apologies i hope you see waht i am saying good luck in your search
What I am saying is that by in calling cultures that aren't yours 'other', then you are starting from a framework where your interest in them is such, as 'other', which essentially means you are still thinking about them from a western centred position. get me.
I don't think that makes philosophies like Levinas invaluable, I just think that all this talk about 'other' has been going on for most of a century now and people get all excited about studying 'the other' in a way that is kind of weirdly voyeuristic and starts to make you wonder about the psychology of it.....
safe epithet tho apologies i hope you see waht i am saying good luck in your search
It's all good, but sorry I still don't quite get what you mean. How should i be thinking of them, as the same not other ? Cultures and their philosophies do tend to remain for the most part exclusive. Cross pollenation tends only to happen in a colonial sense and relatively recently. In searching i seem always to be drawn back to the dreaming.bribkin wrote:in calling cultures that aren't yours 'other', then you are starting from a framework where your interest in them is such, as 'other', which essentially means you are still thinking about them from a western centred position. get me.
safe epithet tho apologies i hope you see waht i am saying good luck in your search
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/bo ... MTIME1.pdf
-
futureproof
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 4:06 pm
- Location: Nottingham
I mean why do you have to think of it as either same or otherepithet wrote:It's all good, but sorry I still don't quite get what you mean. How should i be thinking of them, as the same not other ? Cultures and their philosophies do tend to remain for the most part exclusive. Cross pollenation tends only to happen in a colonial sense and relatively recently. In searching i seem always to be drawn back to the dreaming.bribkin wrote:in calling cultures that aren't yours 'other', then you are starting from a framework where your interest in them is such, as 'other', which essentially means you are still thinking about them from a western centred position. get me.
safe epithet tho apologies i hope you see waht i am saying good luck in your search
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/bo ... MTIME1.pdf
yes bruvs we were discussing the hauntology talk and I am very upset because I can't come thanks so much for reminding me ha ha
Sorry, didn't mean to be patronising.bribkin wrote:lol I don't need an introduction to Levinas safe though.
I guess it just depends on how much influence you think Levinas' Judaism has on his theories. Personally I don't think this precludes any kind of Western allegiance...
SOON COME:
2-Step Origins Mixtape
Pure Wookie Vol. 1
Pure Zed Bias Vol. 1
2-Step Origins Mixtape
Pure Wookie Vol. 1
Pure Zed Bias Vol. 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests