The Ableton Q&A Thread
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- oWLinDaylight
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
Your sub bass should really be on its own channel and attached to the other sounds by midi control or an audio bus.
- symmetricalsounds
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:05 pm
- Location: uk
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
your patch sounds weird to start with...so you've got a patch that's a pad sound AND a sub?Redderious wrote:I have a question regarding sidechain compression...
If i have a pad im using that has a sub bass tied in with two other mid frequency osc, is their a way to sidechain the sub appart from the rest of the patch? Is there a sidechain feature with multiband compression i could use with this? Or should i look into splitting the frequencies and bouncing the sub to a new audio track?
Helps appreciated greatly
i don't think you can sidechain with the multiband compressor in live. i reckon you need to split things up and not after the event but at source, if there is no other way of doing it then yeah split the frequencies but if you can deal with the problem earlier in the chain then it's better.
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:24 pm
- Location: East Coast Steppa
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
This would probably be easiest, theres no reason i shouldn't go with it. Im not trying to save cpu or anything. Just being lazy and not going through th process of matching the envelopes that make up the pad with my sub.oWLinDaylight wrote:Your sub bass should really be on its own channel and attached to the other sounds by midi control or an audio bus.

Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
You can just duplicate the channel then change the instrument to whatever you prefer for a sine
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
Duplicate the instrument and seperate the sub and the pad?
Burial isnt dubstep, fuck off.
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
Well for that particular patch yeah.
Duplicate it and turn off the two mid oscillators that are making the pad leaving the sub.
Turn the sub off on the original channel.
I dunno what Redderious is using but if it was operator you could just drag a new instance in on top of the 2nd patch and make it a sine, all the envelopes/automation should stay in place
Duplicate it and turn off the two mid oscillators that are making the pad leaving the sub.
Turn the sub off on the original channel.
I dunno what Redderious is using but if it was operator you could just drag a new instance in on top of the 2nd patch and make it a sine, all the envelopes/automation should stay in place
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:24 pm
- Location: East Coast Steppa
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
It took me a whole two minutes to recreate the sub on a seperate midi track. I've learned my lesson
- Anne Droid
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:48 pm
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
WHYYYY cant i automate pitch bends in clips when using massive???
If I have massive on a midi track, pitch bending doesnt work, has no effect... why???
If I have massive on a midi track, pitch bending doesnt work, has no effect... why???
- symmetricalsounds
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:05 pm
- Location: uk
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
is that in clip automation you're trying to do that?
- Anne Droid
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:48 pm
- symmetricalsounds
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:05 pm
- Location: uk
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
yeah some plugins i've found it doesn't work. couldn't you automate pitch using parameter in massive?
- Anne Droid
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:48 pm
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
I could but the clip automation in ableton is so much easier as it has the semitones laid out. I can get the parameter into the available automations by configuring it, but then im left with values 0-10000 that are meaninglesssymmetricalsounds wrote:yeah some plugins i've found it doesn't work. couldn't you automate pitch using parameter in massive?
bleh maybe im not seeing the easy way to do this..
- symmetricalsounds
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:05 pm
- Location: uk
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
fair point, personally i'd just make the sound in operator but that's just me.
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
Hey, what's the best way to collab? I'm sending files back and forth but when the recipient opens it and tries to play whatever I put down, the midi tracks dont play any sound. is this because he doesnt have the samples im using or what?

ketamine wrote:Just believe, Lyons, you can be whatever you want. Be a unicorn! Or a table!
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
Hey, what's the best way to collab? I'm sending files back and forth but when the recipient opens it and tries to play whatever I put down, the midi tracks dont play any sound. is this because he doesnt have the samples im using or what?

ketamine wrote:Just believe, Lyons, you can be whatever you want. Be a unicorn! Or a table!
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:24 pm
- Location: East Coast Steppa
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
I've run into the same problem, im trying to to a collab with a friend on the other side of the country right now. What i'm doing is just sending him an audio file containing a verse made by me as well as all the samples im using. As far as sharing the actual project i couldn't tell you how.Raggles wrote:Hey, what's the best way to collab? I'm sending files back and forth but when the recipient opens it and tries to play whatever I put down, the midi tracks dont play any sound. is this because he doesnt have the samples im using or what?
- Anne Droid
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:48 pm
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
hey are any of you guys using operator for your mid/high basses?
Im kind of at the point where I feel like i cant get the sounds out of operator that I can with massive, but I can much more easily control automations and modulations on operator... catch 22
i know its kind of vague, but I just feel like there is more power in operator im not utilizing... anyone have tracks up with some sick basslines they have made in operator? Id like to hear and talk about them!
Im kind of at the point where I feel like i cant get the sounds out of operator that I can with massive, but I can much more easily control automations and modulations on operator... catch 22
i know its kind of vague, but I just feel like there is more power in operator im not utilizing... anyone have tracks up with some sick basslines they have made in operator? Id like to hear and talk about them!
- Disco Nutter
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:39 pm
- Location: Eastern Europe
- Contact:
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
re: Collaboration:
If you guys both use Live and have the same version (because Live has no backwards compatibility) you can use Dropbox and have your project set up there. Instant sync, just don't work on the project at the same time. And save often.

If you guys both use Live and have the same version (because Live has no backwards compatibility) you can use Dropbox and have your project set up there. Instant sync, just don't work on the project at the same time. And save often.

- oWLinDaylight
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: The Ableton Q&A Thread
What are you specifically having trouble with in massive? The modulation control is one of massive's best features.Anne Droid wrote: Im kind of at the point where I feel like i cant get the sounds out of operator that I can with massive, but I can much more easily control automations and modulations on operator... catch 22
- oWLinDaylight
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:33 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests